Fujifilm FinePix JX370

5x, 28 mm, 2.7"
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        Summary Fujifilm JX370

        Prices Price
        Camera only
        Unknown
        Score Snapsort rank
        Among similar cameras
        #n/a of 13
        Specifications Key specs
        Zoom
        Help 5x
        Screen size
        Help 2.7"
        Aperture
        Help Unknown
        Screen resolution
        Help 300k dots
        Wide angle
        Help 28 mm
        Movie format
        Help 720p @ 30fps
        see all specifications

        gallery

        Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Fujifilm FinePix JX370.

        Pros

        Report a correction

        The Fujifilm JX370 vs other recent compacts

        Size Quite small Help
        Compact (95×57×24 mm)
        Weight Light Help
        124 g
        Thickness Thin Help
        0.9"

        Cons

        Report a correction

        The Fujifilm JX370 vs other recent compacts

        Movie format HD movies Help
        720p @ 30fps
        Screen resolution Very low resolution screen Help
        300k dots
        Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
        Risk of blur
        Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
        1,600 ISO
        Battery life Very short battery life Help
        190 shots
        Sensor type Sensor type Help
        CCD
        Longest exposure Short exposures Help
        8 seconds
        Wide angle Poor wide angle lens Help
        28 mm
        Screen size Small screen Help
        2.7"
        Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
        1.1 fps
        True resolution Lower true resolution Help
        9.7 MP
        Sensor size Slightly smaller than average sensor Help
        1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
        Announced Old Help
        August 2011
        Popularity Not so popular Help
        Among snapsort users

        Discussion

        Placeholder
        FinePix JX370
        Fujifilm

        Report a correction

        Showing 1 comments

        Anandssrekumar (8:03 AM, April 16, 2012)
        BETTER,BUT CHARGING TIME?