As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix XP200 is also often compared to travel zooms and digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix XP200's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix XP120 and the FinePix XP10) and GoPro (such as the HERO3 Black Edition and the Hero (2018))

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP200 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a built-in flash, has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a much higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 230k dots), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm).

GoPro HERO3 Black Edition

GoPro HERO3 Black Edition
5 months older

Significant advantages of the Black Edition (vs the XP200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Black Edition (vs the XP200)

  • None found

common strengths of the Black Edition and XP200

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP10

Fujifilm FinePix XP10
3 years older
$160

Significant advantages of the XP10 (vs the XP200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP10 (vs the XP200)

  • None found

common strengths of the XP10 and XP200

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Fujifilm FinePix XP70
9 months newer
$179

Significant advantages of the XP70 (vs the XP200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP70 (vs the XP200)

  • None found

common strengths of the XP70 and XP200

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Fujifilm FinePix XP60
similar age

Significant advantages of the XP60 (vs the XP200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP60 (vs the XP200)

  • None found

common strengths of the XP60 and XP200

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix TS25

Panasonic Lumix TS25
similar age
$200

Significant advantages of the TS25 (vs the XP200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the TS25 (vs the XP200)

  • None found

common strengths of the TS25 and XP200

  • None found

Ricoh WG-30

Ricoh WG-30
1 year newer
$368

Significant advantages of the WG-30 (vs the XP200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WG-30 (vs the XP200)

  • None found

common strengths of the WG-30 and XP200

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP200 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 460k dots), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), has a significantly longer battery life (300 shots vs 240 shots) and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 26 mm), is slightly larger (compact (116×71×30 mm) vs compact (96×59×29 mm)), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and is older (march 2013 vs may 2017).

Fujifilm FinePix XP120

Fujifilm FinePix XP120
3 years newer
$94 - $114

Significant advantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP200)

  • Much shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the FinePix XP120 and XP200

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.2"

Fujifilm FinePix XP130

Placeholder
4 years newer
$130 - $162

Significant advantages of the FinePix XP130 (vs the XP200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix XP130 (vs the XP200)

  • Significantly shorter battery life: 240 shots vs 300 shots
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the FinePix XP130 and XP200

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.2"

GoPro Hero (2018)

Placeholder
5 years newer
$259

Significant advantages of the Hero (2018) (vs the XP200)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (65×45×35 mm) vs Compact (116×71×30 mm)
  • Has a touch screen
  • Much lighter: 117 g vs 232 g

Significant disadvantages of the Hero (2018) (vs the XP200)

  • No built-in flash
  • Much smaller screen: 2" vs 3"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the Hero (2018) and XP200

  • None found

Olympus Tough TG-5

Placeholder
4 years newer
$399

Significant advantages of the Tough TG-5 (vs the XP200)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the Tough TG-5 (vs the XP200)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the Tough TG-5 and XP200

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Great battery life: 340 shots vs 300 shots

Nikon Coolpix A10

Nikon Coolpix A10
2 years newer
$87 - $88

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A10 (vs the XP200)

  • Significantly smaller: Compact (96×59×29 mm) vs Compact (116×71×30 mm)
  • Significantly lighter: 160 g vs 232 g

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A10 (vs the XP200)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Much shorter battery life: 200 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the Coolpix A10 and XP200

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.2"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP200 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 460k dots), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 240 shots) and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.4), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), doesn't have a touch screen and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Nikon Coolpix S3700

Nikon Coolpix S3700
1 year newer
$200

Significant advantages of the S3700 (vs the XP200)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the S3700 (vs the XP200)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Shorter battery life: 240 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the S3700 and XP200

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix A1000

Placeholder
5 years newer
$477

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A1000 (vs the XP200)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/3.9
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A1000 (vs the XP200)

  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the Coolpix A1000 and XP200

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99

Placeholder
5 years newer
$448

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 (vs the XP200)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a touch screen
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 (vs the XP200)

  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 and XP200

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix SZ9

Panasonic Lumix SZ9
similar age
$248

Significant advantages of the SZ9 (vs the XP200)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the SZ9 (vs the XP200)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 220 shots vs 300 shots
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the SZ9 and XP200

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SX740 HS

Placeholder
5 years newer
$338 - $399

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX740 HS (vs the XP200)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX740 HS (vs the XP200)

  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the PowerShot SX740 HS and XP200

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix A300

Nikon Coolpix A300
3 years newer
$99

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A300 (vs the XP200)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A300 (vs the XP200)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Shorter battery life: 240 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the Coolpix A300 and XP200

  • None found

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP200 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a significantly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 230k dots), has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 220 shots), is waterproof and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1300 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a screen which flips out, is older (march 2013 vs may 2018) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital).

Nikon Coolpix W100

Nikon Coolpix W100
3 years newer
$99 - $157

Significant advantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the XP200)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the XP200)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 220 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the Coolpix W100 and XP200

  • Light weight: 177 g vs 232 g

Panasonic Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

Placeholder
5 years newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7) (vs the XP200)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7) (vs the XP200)

  • Not waterproof
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1300 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7) and XP200

  • None found