Summary Fujifilm T500

Prices Price
Camera only
$472
Score Snapsort rank
Within its price range
#n/a of 3
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 8
Specifications Key specs
Zoom
Help 12x
Screen size
Help 2.7"
Aperture
Help f/3.4
Screen resolution
Help 230k dots
Wide angle
Help 24 mm
Movie format
Help 720p @ 30fps
see all specifications
Fujifilm FinePix T500Fujifilm FinePix T500

gallery

Explore our gallery of 26 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix T500.

Pros

Report a correction

The Fujifilm T500 vs other recent compacts

Wide angle Great wide angle lens Help
24 mm
Image stabilization Image stabilization Help
  1. Lens
Built-in flash Built-in flash Help
Usually standard
Report a correction

The Fujifilm T500 vs other recent travel zooms

Size Really small Help
Super compact (99×57×19 mm)
Weight Very light Help
141 g
Thickness Thin Help
0.7"
Lowest price Inexpensive Help
$472.42

Cons

Report a correction

The Fujifilm T500 vs other recent compacts

Autofocus contrast detection autofocus Help
slower focusing
Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
1/2000 of a second
Sensor type Sensor type Help
CCD
Report a correction

The Fujifilm T500 vs other recent travel zooms

Zoom Poor zoom Help
12x
Screen size Below average sized screen Help
2.7"
Touch screen No touch screen Help
More buttons
Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
Sensor size Small sensor Help
1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
Viewfinder Can only preview photos on the screen Help
None
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users
Screen resolution Very low resolution screen Help
230k dots
Light sensitivity Very poor maximum light sensitivity Help
3,200 ISO
True resolution Lower true resolution Help
9.7 MP
Battery life Very short battery life Help
200 shots
Announced Old Help
January 2013
Longest exposure Short exposures Help
8 seconds

Appearance

front photo of the Fujifilm FinePix T500back photo of the Fujifilm FinePix T500angle photo of the Fujifilm FinePix T500

Discussion

Fujifilm FinePix T500
FinePix T500
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments