Summary Fujifilm S9400W

Prices Price
Camera only
$447
Score Snapsort rank
Within its price range
#n/a of 2
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 5
Specifications Key specs
Zoom
Help 50x
Screen size
Help 3"
Aperture
Help f/2.9
Screen resolution
Help 460k dots
Wide angle
Help 24 mm
Movie format
Help 1080p @ 60fps
see all specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S9400WFujifilm FinePix S9400W

Pros

Report a correction

The Fujifilm S9400W vs other recent digicams

Aperture Wide aperture Help
f/2.9
Image stabilization Image stabilization Help
  1. Lens
Viewfinder Doesn't use battery, see more detail Help
Digital
Wide angle Great wide angle lens Help
24 mm
Battery life Incredible battery life Help
500 shots
Report a correction

The Fujifilm S9400W vs other recent super zooms

Size Quite small Help
Professional size (123×87×116 mm)
Lowest price Inexpensive Help
$447.39
Weight Light Help
670 g

Cons

Report a correction

The Fujifilm S9400W vs other recent digicams

Size Slightly large Help
Professional size (123×87×116 mm)
Announced Old Help
January 2014
Weight Heavy Help
670 g
Touch screen No touch screen Help
More buttons
Thickness Thick Help
4.6"
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users
Report a correction

The Fujifilm S9400W vs other recent super zooms

Zoom Below average zoom Help
50x
True resolution Lower true resolution Help
9.7 MP
Autofocus contrast detection autofocus Help
slower focusing
Sensor size Slightly smaller than average sensor Help
1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
1/1700 of a second
Screen resolution Very low resolution screen Help
460k dots
Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack Help
Limited to the in-camera mic
External flash No external flash Help
Less expandable
Longest exposure Short exposures Help
8 seconds

Appearance

front photo of the Fujifilm FinePix S9400Wback photo of the Fujifilm FinePix S9400Wangle photo of the Fujifilm FinePix S9400W

Discussion

Fujifilm FinePix S9400W
FinePix S9400W
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments