As well as being compared against other digicams, the Fujifilm FinePix S8350 is also often compared to super zooms, entry-level DSLRs, pro digicams and compacts. The Fujifilm FinePix S8350's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix S8300 and the FinePix S1) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix L820 and the D3200)

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S8350 compared to other digicam competitors include: it has significantly more zoom (42x vs 14x), significantly higher maximum light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 1,600 ISO), has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 120 shots), is newer (july, 2013 vs august, 2012) and has a viewfinder (digital vs none).

Nikon Coolpix L610

Nikon Coolpix L610
10 months older
$139

Significant advantages of the L610 (vs the S8350)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the L610 (vs the S8350)

  • Significantly less zoom: 14x vs 42x
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 1,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 120 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the L610 and S8350

  • In-camera panoramas
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L610 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S8350

Olympus Stylus SZ-16 iHS

Olympus Stylus SZ-16 iHS
5 months older
$149

Significant advantages of the SZ-16 iHS (vs the S8350)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SZ-16 iHS (vs the S8350)

  • Less zoom: 24x vs 42x
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the SZ-16 iHS and S8350

  • In-camera HDR
  • In-camera panoramas
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Olympus Stylus SZ-16 iHS vs the Fujifilm FinePix S8350

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S8350 compared to super zoom competitors include: it significantly higher maximum light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO), is newer (july, 2013 vs january, 2013) and has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly shorter battery life (300 shots vs 500 shots), doesn't shoot RAW, doesn't support an external flash and is less popular.

Fujifilm FinePix S8300

Fujifilm FinePix S8300
5 months older

Significant advantages of the S8300 (vs the S8350)

  • Much longer battery life: 500 shots vs 300 shots

Significant disadvantages of the S8300 (vs the S8350)

  • None found

common strengths of the S8300 and S8350

  • Extremely good maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • In-camera HDR
arrow Compare the S8300 vs the S8350

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
5 months older
$168

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the S8350)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the S8350)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the L820 and S8350

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • In-camera HDR
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L820 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S8350

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
9 months older
$399 - $400

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX50 HS (vs the S8350)

  • Shoots RAW
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX50 HS (vs the S8350)

  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

common strengths of the PowerShot SX50 HS and S8350

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • In-camera HDR
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix S8350

Fujifilm FinePix S1

Fujifilm FinePix S1
6 months newer
$391 - $499

Significant advantages of the S1 (vs the S8350)

  • Shoots RAW
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the S1 (vs the S8350)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

common strengths of the S1 and S8350

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • In-camera HDR
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
arrow Compare the S1 vs the S8350

Fujifilm FinePix S8400W

Fujifilm FinePix S8400W
3 months older
$319

Significant advantages of the S8400W (vs the S8350)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S8400W (vs the S8350)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

common strengths of the S8400W and S8350

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • In-camera HDR
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
arrow Compare the S8400W vs the S8350

Fujifilm FinePix S6800

Fujifilm FinePix S6800
5 months older
$155 - $159

Significant advantages of the S6800 (vs the S8350)

  • Much longer battery life: 700 shots vs 300 shots

Significant disadvantages of the S6800 (vs the S8350)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the S6800 and S8350

  • Extremely good maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • In-camera HDR
arrow Compare the S6800 vs the S8350

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S8350 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has image stabilization (lens vs none), has in-camera HDR, creates panoramas in-camera and is newer (july, 2013 vs february, 2011).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm vs APS-C 23.2x15.4mm), has a lower quality type of viewfinder (digital vs pentamirror), lacks and external mic jack, has a slightly shorter battery life (300 shots vs 540 shots) and users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection).

Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200
1 year older
$319 (body only)
$389 - $477 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3200 (vs the S8350)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.2x15.4mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the D3200 (vs the S8350)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Lacks in-camera HDR
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the D3200 and S8350

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon D3200 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S8350

Canon Rebel SL1

Canon Rebel SL1
3 months older
$599 - $600 (body only)
$599 - $620 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the SL1 (vs the S8350)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the SL1 (vs the S8350)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the SL1 and S8350

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel SL1 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S8350

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
1 year older
$725 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the S8350)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the S8350)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the T4i and S8350

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T4i vs the Fujifilm FinePix S8350

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
2 years older
$499 (body only)
$549 - $579 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the S8350)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the S8350)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Lacks in-camera HDR
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the T3i and S8350

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3i vs the Fujifilm FinePix S8350

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S8350 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has way more more zoom (42x vs 2.9x), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm vs nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a significantly narrower aperture (f/2.9 vs f/1.8), doesn't support an external flash and is less popular.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III
10 months newer
$798

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the S8350)

  • Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/2.9

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the S8350)

  • Much less zoom: 2.9x vs 42x

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 III and S8350

  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Very good maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
  • In-camera panoramas
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III vs the Fujifilm FinePix S8350

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
1 year older
$498

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the S8350)

  • Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/2.9

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the S8350)

  • Much less zoom: 3.6x vs 42x
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and S8350

  • In-camera panoramas
  • In-camera HDR
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S8350

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S8350 compared to compact competitors include: it has way more more zoom (42x vs 3x), has a much wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 36 mm), has a significantly larger screen (3.0" vs 1.5"), has better image stabilization (lens vs none) and much higher maximum light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 400 ISO).

Canon PowerShot S500

Placeholder
9 years older

Significant advantages of the S500 (vs the S8350)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S500 (vs the S8350)

  • Much less zoom: 3x vs 42x
  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 3.0"
  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 24 mm

common strengths of the S500 and S8350

  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Digital
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot S500 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S8350

Samsung i80

Samsung i80
5 years older

Significant advantages of the i80 (vs the S8350)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the i80 (vs the S8350)

  • Much less zoom: 3x vs 42x
  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 24 mm
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 1,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

common strengths of the i80 and S8350

  • None found
arrow Compare the Samsung i80 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S8350

Nikon Coolpix S550

Nikon Coolpix S550
5 years older

Significant advantages of the S550 (vs the S8350)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S550 (vs the S8350)

  • Much less zoom: 5x vs 42x
  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 24 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the S550 and S8350

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S550 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S8350

Fujifilm FinePix AX300

Fujifilm FinePix AX300
2 years older

Significant advantages of the AX300 (vs the S8350)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the AX300 (vs the S8350)

  • Much less zoom: 5x vs 42x
  • Much worse wide angle: 33 mm vs 24 mm
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 1,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

common strengths of the AX300 and S8350

  • None found
arrow Compare the AX300 vs the S8350