As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR is also often compared to digicams and compacts. The Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix F800EXR and the FinePix F500 EXR) and Canon (such as the PowerShot SX240 HS and the PowerShot SX230 HS)

Competitor classes

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F770 EXR compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it has a built-in GPS, shoots faster continuously (11 fps vs 3 fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is newer (january 2012 vs january 2011).

However, on average it is thicker (1.4" vs 1.3").

Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the F500 EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the F500 EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the F500 EXR and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (104×64×33 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1.4"
  • Light weight: 215 g vs 234 g

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS
similar age

Significant advantages of the SX240 HS (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the SX240 HS (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Shoots slower: 2.4 fps vs 11 fps

common strengths of the SX240 HS and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (106×61×33 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1.4"
  • Light weight: 224 g vs 234 g

Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the F305EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the F305EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Shoots slower: 1.5 fps vs 11 fps

common strengths of the F305EXR and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (104×59×33 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1.4"
  • Light weight: 215 g vs 234 g

Fujifilm FinePix F550 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F550 EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the F550 EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the F550 EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the F550 EXR and F770 EXR

  • Built-in GPS
  • Fairly small: Compact (104×64×33 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1.4"

Fujifilm FinePix F750 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F750 EXR
similar age

Significant advantages of the F750 EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the F750 EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the F750 EXR and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×63×36 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Light weight: 234 g vs 234 g
  • Thin: 1.4" vs 1.4"

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
1 year newer
$396

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots
  • Smaller: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the ZS30 and F770 EXR

  • Built-in GPS
  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.4"

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F770 EXR compared to digicam competitors include: it has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it is older (january 2012 vs july 2012).

Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR
6 months newer

Significant advantages of the F800EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the F800EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the F800EXR and F770 EXR

  • Light weight: 208 g vs 234 g

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F770 EXR compared to compact competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (20x vs 3x), has a much wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 38 mm), has a significantly larger screen (3" vs 1.8"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 134k dots) and has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none).

However, on average it is significantly larger (compact (105×63×36 mm) vs compact (96×56×24 mm)), is thicker (1.4" vs 0.9"), is slightly heavier (234 g vs 165 g), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel) and slightly shorter exposures (8 seconds vs 30 seconds).

Olympus Stylus 820

Olympus Stylus 820
4 years older

Significant advantages of the Stylus 820 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Significantly smaller: Compact (96×56×24 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Much thinner: 0.9" vs 1.4"
  • Significantly lighter: 165 g vs 234 g

Significant disadvantages of the Stylus 820 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 25 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Stylus 820 and F770 EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-F88

Placeholder
7 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-F88 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Much thinner: 1" vs 1.4"
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None
  • Significantly longer exposures: 30 seconds vs 8 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-F88 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 25 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3"

common strengths of the DSC-F88 and F770 EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash