As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR is also often compared to mirrorless, super zooms and pro digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR's top rivals come from Canon (such as the Powershot SX40 and the PowerShot SX240 HS) and Nikon (such as the 1 J4)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F770 EXR compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it is slightly larger (compact (105×63×36 mm) vs compact (105×59×28 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), is older (january 2012 vs january 2013) and is thicker (1.4" vs 1.1").

Fujifilm FinePix F850EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F850EXR
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the F850EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the F850EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the F850EXR and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×61×36 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 1.4" vs 1.4"
  • Light weight: 232 g vs 234 g

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS
similar age

Significant advantages of the SX240 HS (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the SX240 HS (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Shoots slower: 2.4 fps vs 11 fps

common strengths of the SX240 HS and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (106×61×33 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1.4"
  • Light weight: 224 g vs 234 g

Fujifilm FinePix F750 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F750 EXR
similar age

Significant advantages of the F750 EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the F750 EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the F750 EXR and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×63×36 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 1.4" vs 1.4"
  • Light weight: 234 g vs 234 g

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly thinner: 1.1" vs 1.4"
  • Longer exposures: 30 seconds vs 8 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the ZS25 and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.4"
  • Light weight: 193 g vs 234 g

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
1 year newer
$344

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has a touch screen
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the ZS30 and F770 EXR

  • Built-in GPS
  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.4"

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX200

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX200
1 year newer
$213

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX200 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (92×52×22 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much thinner: 0.9" vs 1.4"

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX200 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the DSC-WX200 and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (92×52×22 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.4"
  • Light weight: 121 g vs 234 g

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F770 EXR compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a much lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,037k dots), records less high-speed movies (320 fps vs 1,200 fps), takes slightly lower resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 18.4 MP), doesn't have a touch screen and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (11 fps vs 60 fps).

Nikon 1 J4

Nikon 1 J4
2 years newer
$459 10-30mm lens

Significant advantages of the J4 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Higher speed movies: 1,200 fps vs 320 fps
  • Shoots much faster: 60 fps vs 11 fps
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,037k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the J4 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the J4 and F770 EXR

  • Extremely high speed movies: 1,200 fps vs 320 fps
  • Fairly small: Compact (100×60×29 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Very light: 192 g vs 234 g

Fujifilm X-M1

Fujifilm X-M1
1 year newer
$467 (body only)

Significant advantages of the X-M1 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the X-M1 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 320 fps
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the X-M1 and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Mid size (117×67×39 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Light weight: 330 g vs 234 g
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 1.4"

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F770 EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots), is slightly smaller (compact (105×63×36 mm) vs professional size (123×92×108 mm)), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), is thinner (1.4" vs 4.3") and is slightly lighter (234 g vs 600 g).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.7), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (25 mm vs 24 mm), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), doesn't have a screen which flips out and is older (january 2012 vs january 2013).

Canon Powershot SX40

Canon Powershot SX40
3 months older
$724

Significant advantages of the SX40 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.5
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the SX40 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Larger: Professional size (123×92×108 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly thicker: 4.3" vs 1.4"

common strengths of the SX40 and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Professional size (123×92×108 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 4.3" vs 1.4"
  • Light weight: 600 g vs 234 g

Fujifilm FinePix S4600

Fujifilm FinePix S4600
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the S4600 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S4600 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Larger: Professional size (122×93×100 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the S4600 and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Professional size (122×93×100 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 3.9" vs 1.4"
  • Light weight: 518 g vs 234 g

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F770 EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has significantly more zoom (20x vs 3x), has a much wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 35 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 1.8"), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1" 13.2x8.8mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/1.8), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,229k dots), is slightly larger (compact (105×63×36 mm) vs compact (108×54×28 mm)) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 20 MP).

Fujifilm FinePix F700

Placeholder
9 years older

Significant advantages of the F700 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Smaller: Compact (108×54×28 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Significantly thinner: 1.1" vs 1.4"
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the F700 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 25 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the F700 and F770 EXR

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II
1 year newer
$548

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 II (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Significantly larger sensor: 1" 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 II (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 II and F770 EXR

  • None found