As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR is also often compared to pro digicams, super zooms, compacts and mirrorless. The Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR's top rivals come from Canon (such as the Powershot S100 and the ELPH 310 HS) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix S8600)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F770 EXR compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it has way more more zoom (20x vs 8x), has a built-in GPS and records even higher-speed movies (320 fps vs 220 fps).

However, on average it is slightly larger (compact (105×63×36 mm) vs super compact (96×57×22 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs LensSensor shift), doesn't have a touch screen, doesn't record movies in 24p and is older (january 2012 vs january 2013).

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
4 months older
$240

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Significantly smaller: Super compact (96×57×22 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Supports 24p
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    2. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Much less zoom: 8x vs 20x
  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm

common strengths of the 310 HS and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (96×57×22 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Extremely high speed movies: 240 fps vs 320 fps
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 1.4"

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Smaller: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly thinner: 1.1" vs 1.4"

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the ZS25 and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Extremely high speed movies: 220 fps vs 320 fps
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 1.4"

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
1 year newer
$344

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has a touch screen
  • Smaller: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the ZS30 and F770 EXR

  • Built-in GPS
  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Extremely high speed movies: 220 fps vs 320 fps

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS
similar age

Significant advantages of the SX240 HS (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Supports 24p
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the SX240 HS (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the SX240 HS and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (106×61×33 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Extremely high speed movies: 240 fps vs 320 fps
  • Very thin: 1.3" vs 1.4"

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F770 EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it records even higher-speed movies (320 fps vs none), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), is newer (january 2012 vs july 2010) and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't support an external flash and has a slower max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second).

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
3 months older
$415

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.5
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the S100 and F770 EXR

  • Built-in GPS

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
1 year older
$700

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX5 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.5
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX5 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the DMC-LX5 and F770 EXR

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F770 EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (compact (105×63×36 mm) vs standard size (121×81×65 mm)), records high-speed movies (320 fps vs none), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), is thinner (1.4" vs 2.5") and is slightly lighter (234 g vs 450 g).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.9), has slightly less zoom (20x vs 36x) and is older (january 2012 vs january 2014).

Fujifilm FinePix S8600

Fujifilm FinePix S8600
2 years newer
$256

Significant advantages of the S8600 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S8600 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 320 fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the S8600 and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Standard size (121×81×65 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Very thin: 2.5" vs 1.4"
  • Light weight: 450 g vs 234 g

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F770 EXR compared to compact competitors include: it has way more more zoom (20x vs 5x), records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps), has a much wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 36 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7") and has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.7), is significantly larger (compact (105×63×36 mm) vs super compact (97×57×22 mm)), is thicker (1.4" vs 0.9") and is significantly heavier (234 g vs 132 g).

Olympus Stylus 820

Olympus Stylus 820
4 years older
$60

Significant advantages of the Stylus 820 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Significantly smaller: Compact (96×56×24 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Much thinner: 0.9" vs 1.4"
  • Significantly lighter: 165 g vs 234 g

Significant disadvantages of the Stylus 820 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Much less zoom: 5x vs 20x
  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 25 mm
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 320 fps

common strengths of the Stylus 820 and F770 EXR

  • Great zoom: 5x vs 20x
  • Each has a built-in flash

Nikon Coolpix S5100

Nikon Coolpix S5100
1 year older
$245

Significant advantages of the S5100 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Significantly smaller: Super compact (97×57×22 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much thinner: 0.9" vs 1.4"

Significant disadvantages of the S5100 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Much less zoom: 5x vs 20x
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 320 fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the S5100 and F770 EXR

  • Great zoom: 5x vs 20x
  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F770 EXR compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a much lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,037k dots), records less high-speed movies (320 fps vs 1,200 fps), takes slightly lower resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 18.4 MP), doesn't have a touch screen and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (11 fps vs 60 fps).

Nikon 1 J4

Nikon 1 J4
2 years newer
$291 10-30mm lens

Significant advantages of the J4 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Higher speed movies: 1,200 fps vs 320 fps
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,037k dots vs 460k dots
  • Shoots much faster: 60 fps vs 11 fps

Significant disadvantages of the J4 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the J4 and F770 EXR

  • Extremely high speed movies: 1,200 fps vs 320 fps
  • Fairly small: Compact (100×60×29 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Very light: 192 g vs 234 g

Nikon 1 J2

Nikon 1 J2
7 months newer
$379 10-30mm lens

Significant advantages of the J2 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Higher speed movies: 1,200 fps vs 320 fps
  • Shoots much faster: 60 fps vs 11 fps
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the J2 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the J2 and F770 EXR

  • Extremely high speed movies: 1,200 fps vs 320 fps
  • Fairly small: Compact (106×61×30 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Light weight: 280 g vs 234 g