As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR is also often compared to super zooms, compacts and mirrorless. The Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix F30 Zoom and the FinePix F80EXR) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix ZS30 and the Lumix DMC-ZS50)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F770 EXR compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it has a built-in GPS and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it is slightly larger (compact (105×63×36 mm) vs compact (105×59×28 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), is older (january 2012 vs january 2013) and is thicker (1.4" vs 1.1").

Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Canon PowerShot SX280 HS
1 year newer
$239

Significant advantages of the SX280 HS (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the SX280 HS (vs the F770 EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the SX280 HS and F770 EXR

  • Built-in GPS
  • Fairly small: Compact (106×63×33 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1.4"

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
1 year newer
$344

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has a touch screen
  • Smaller: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the ZS30 and F770 EXR

  • Built-in GPS
  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.4"

Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR
1 year older
$636

Significant advantages of the F80EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Significantly smaller: Compact (99×59×28 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Significantly thinner: 1.1" vs 1.4"

Significant disadvantages of the F80EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Worse wide angle: 27 mm vs 25 mm

common strengths of the F80EXR and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (99×59×28 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.4"
  • Light weight: 210 g vs 234 g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50
3 years newer
$279 - $390

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS50 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • More zoom: 30x vs 20x
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 460k dots
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS50 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the DMC-ZS50 and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (111×65×34 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1.4"
  • Light weight: 243 g vs 234 g

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Smaller: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly thinner: 1.1" vs 1.4"

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the ZS25 and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.4"
  • Light weight: 193 g vs 234 g

Fujifilm FinePix F850EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F850EXR
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the F850EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the F850EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the F850EXR and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×61×36 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Light weight: 232 g vs 234 g
  • Thin: 1.4" vs 1.4"

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F770 EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (compact (105×63×36 mm) vs professional size (123×87×116 mm)), records even higher-speed movies (320 fps vs none), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), is thinner (1.4" vs 4.6") and is slightly lighter (234 g vs 670 g).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.9), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (25 mm vs 23 mm), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), doesn't have a screen which flips out and lacks and external mic jack.

Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500
4 years newer
$199 - $257

Significant advantages of the Coolpix B500 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Better wide angle: 23 mm vs 25 mm
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix B500 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly thicker: 3.7" vs 1.4"

common strengths of the Coolpix B500 and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (114×78×95 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 3.7" vs 1.4"
  • Light weight: 541 g vs 234 g

Fujifilm FinePix S9900W

Fujifilm FinePix S9900W
3 years newer
$700

Significant advantages of the FinePix S9900W (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix S9900W (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Professional size (123×87×116 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly thicker: 4.6" vs 1.4"

common strengths of the FinePix S9900W and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Professional size (123×87×116 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Light weight: 670 g vs 234 g

Fujifilm FinePix S4600

Fujifilm FinePix S4600
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the S4600 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S4600 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Significantly larger: Professional size (122×93×100 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the S4600 and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Professional size (122×93×100 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Thin: 3.9" vs 1.4"
  • Light weight: 518 g vs 234 g

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR
similar age

Significant advantages of the HS30 EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the HS30 EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Large (131×97×126 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • No built-in GPS
  • Much thicker: 5" vs 1.4"

common strengths of the HS30 EXR and F770 EXR

  • Light weight: 687 g vs 234 g

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F770 EXR compared to compact competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (20x vs 3.7x), has a much wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 36 mm), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), shoots faster continuously (11 fps vs 2.2 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it is significantly larger (compact (105×63×36 mm) vs compact (96×56×24 mm)), doesn't have a touch screen, is thicker (1.4" vs 0.9"), is slightly heavier (234 g vs 165 g) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Fujifilm FinePix F30 Zoom

Fujifilm FinePix F30 Zoom
5 years older

Significant advantages of the F30 Zoom (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Significantly smaller: Compact (93×57×28 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Significantly thinner: 1.1" vs 1.4"

Significant disadvantages of the F30 Zoom (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 25 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the F30 Zoom and F770 EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash

Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR

Fujfilm Finepix Z900EXR
9 months older

Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (101×59×18 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Has a touch screen
  • Much thinner: 0.7" vs 1.4"

Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the Z900EXR and F770 EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.5" vs 3"

Olympus Stylus 820

Olympus Stylus 820
4 years older

Significant advantages of the Stylus 820 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Significantly smaller: Compact (96×56×24 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Much thinner: 0.9" vs 1.4"
  • Lighter: 165 g vs 234 g

Significant disadvantages of the Stylus 820 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 25 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Stylus 820 and F770 EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash

Canon PowerShot SD950 IS

Canon PowerShot SD950 IS
4 years older
$1,102

Significant advantages of the SD950 IS (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Significantly smaller: Compact (96×60×28 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly thinner: 1.1" vs 1.4"

Significant disadvantages of the SD950 IS (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 25 mm
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the SD950 IS and F770 EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F770 EXR compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), shoots faster continuously (11 fps vs 5 fps), has a built-in GPS and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), records less high-speed movies (320 fps vs 1,200 fps), takes slightly lower resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 20 MP), doesn't have a screen which flips out and has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.7mm).

Samsung NX3000

Samsung NX3000
2 years newer
$326 20-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the NX3000 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Significantly higher true resolution: 20 MP vs 10.6 MP

Significant disadvantages of the NX3000 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 320 fps
  • Shoots significantly slower: 5 fps vs 11 fps

common strengths of the NX3000 and F770 EXR

  • Fairly small: Mid size (117×66×39 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Very light: 230 g vs 234 g
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 1.4"

Nikon 1 J3

Nikon 1 J3
1 year newer
$500 10-30mm lens

Significant advantages of the J3 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • Higher speed movies: 1,200 fps vs 320 fps
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the J3 (vs the F770 EXR)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the J3 and F770 EXR

  • Extremely high speed movies: 1,200 fps vs 320 fps
  • Fairly small: Compact (101×61×29 mm) vs Compact (105×63×36 mm)
  • Very light: 224 g vs 234 g