As well as being compared against other compacts, the Casio Exilim TRYX is also often compared to travel zooms and mirrorless. The Casio Exilim TRYX's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SX220 HS and the PowerShot S95) and Sony (such as the NEX 5T)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio TRYX compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (21 mm vs 28 mm), is much smaller (super compact (122×58×15 mm) vs compact (100×58×30 mm)), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), is thinner (0.6" vs 1.2") and has a faster max shutter speed (1/4000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in flash, doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), doesn't have a touch screen, doesn't have a screen which flips out and is much more expensive ($1,239.89 vs $315.00).

Casio EX-TR150

Casio EX-TR150
4 months newer

Significant advantages of the EX-TR150 (vs the TRYX)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/16000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the EX-TR150 (vs the TRYX)

  • None found

common strengths of the EX-TR150 and TRYX

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Excellent wide angle: 21 mm vs 21 mm
  • Very small: Super compact (123×59×15 mm) vs Super compact (122×58×15 mm)

Canon PowerShot S95

Canon PowerShot S95
4 months older
$315

Significant advantages of the S95 (vs the TRYX)

  • Built-in flash
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Longer exposures: 15 seconds vs 1/8 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the S95 (vs the TRYX)

  • Much larger: Compact (100×58×30 mm) vs Super compact (122×58×15 mm)
  • Much worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 21 mm
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the S95 and TRYX

  • Wide aperture: f/2 vs f/2.8
  • Very small: Compact (100×58×30 mm) vs Super compact (122×58×15 mm)
  • Thin: 1.2" vs 0.6"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio TRYX compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much wider wide angle lens (21 mm vs 28 mm), is much smaller (super compact (122×58×15 mm) vs compact (106×59×33 mm)), is thinner (0.6" vs 1.3"), is significantly lighter (157 g vs 215 g) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/4000 of a second vs 1/3200 of a second).

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in flash, doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and slightly shorter exposures (1/8 of a second vs 15 seconds).

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS
similar age

Significant advantages of the SX220 HS (vs the TRYX)

  • Built-in flash
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Longer exposures: 15 seconds vs 1/8 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the SX220 HS (vs the TRYX)

  • Much larger: Compact (106×59×33 mm) vs Super compact (122×58×15 mm)
  • Much worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 21 mm
  • Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.6"

common strengths of the SX220 HS and TRYX

  • Very small: Compact (106×59×33 mm) vs Super compact (122×58×15 mm)
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 0.6"
  • Very light: 215 g vs 157 g

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio TRYX compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it is thinner (0.6" vs 1.5") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 276 g).

However, on average it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 16 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Sony NEX 5T

Sony NEX 5T
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the 5T (vs the TRYX)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Supports 24p
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the 5T (vs the TRYX)

  • Significantly thicker: 1.5" vs 0.6"

common strengths of the 5T and TRYX

  • Fairly small: Mid size (111×59×39 mm) vs Super compact (122×58×15 mm)
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 0.6"
  • Light weight: 276 g vs 157 g