The Casio QV-R62 is mostly gets compared to other compacts. The Casio QV-R62's top rivals come from HP (such as the Photosmart R927)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio QV-R62 compared to other compact competitors include: it is thinner (1.3" vs 2.4") and has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (39 mm vs 35 mm), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3"), is significantly larger (compact (88×61×33 mm) vs compact (96×26×62 mm)), is older (december 2004 vs january 2006) and slightly shorter exposures (4 seconds vs 16 seconds).

HP Photosmart R927

HP Photosmart R927
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the R927 (vs the QV-R62)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Significantly better wide angle: 35 mm vs 39 mm
  • Significantly smaller: Compact (96×26×62 mm) vs Compact (88×61×33 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the R927 (vs the QV-R62)

  • Much thicker: 2.4" vs 1.3"
  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the R927 and QV-R62

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Very small: Compact (96×26×62 mm) vs Compact (88×61×33 mm)