As well as being compared against other compacts, the Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 is also often compared to boutiques and travel zooms. The Casio Exilim EX-ZR10's top rivals come from Casio (such as the Exilim ZR15 and the Exilim ZR400) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-LX3)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-ZR10 compared to other compact competitors include: it shoots faster continuously (40 fps vs 3 fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), is thinner (1.1" vs 1.6") and is significantly lighter (176 g vs 265 g).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3 vs f/2), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,228k dots), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 20 MP).

Casio Exilim ZR15

Casio Exilim EX-ZR15
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the ZR15 (vs the EX-ZR10)

  • Much smaller: Compact (102×59×27 mm) vs Compact (102×69×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the ZR15 (vs the EX-ZR10)

  • Shoots much slower: 3 fps vs 40 fps

common strengths of the ZR15 and EX-ZR10

  • Very small: Compact (102×59×27 mm) vs Compact (102×69×27 mm)
  • Light weight: 176 g vs 176 g
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3
2 years older
$778

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX3 (vs the EX-ZR10)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3
  • Smaller: Compact (109×60×27 mm) vs Compact (102×69×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX3 (vs the EX-ZR10)

  • Shoots much slower: 2.5 fps vs 40 fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Much heavier: 265 g vs 176 g

common strengths of the DMC-LX3 and EX-ZR10

  • Very small: Compact (109×60×27 mm) vs Compact (102×69×27 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV
4 years newer
$650 - $898

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the EX-ZR10)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,228k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the EX-ZR10)

  • Much larger: Compact (102×58×41 mm) vs Compact (102×69×27 mm)
  • Shoots much slower: 16 fps vs 40 fps
  • Much heavier: 298 g vs 176 g

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 IV and EX-ZR10

  • Fast continuous shooting: 16 fps vs 40 fps

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-ZR10 compared to boutique competitors include: it has way more more zoom (7x vs 3.1x), is slightly smaller (compact (102×69×27 mm) vs mid size (118×66×55 mm)), shoots faster continuously (40 fps vs 11 fps), is thinner (1.1" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (176 g vs 405 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/3 vs f/1.7), has a much narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.16x4.62mm vs four thirds 17.3x13mm).

Leica D-Lux (Typ 109)

Leica D-Lux (Typ 109)
4 years newer
$895 - $966

Significant advantages of the D-Lux (Typ 109) (vs the EX-ZR10)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/1.7 vs f/3
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the D-Lux (Typ 109) (vs the EX-ZR10)

  • Much less zoom: 3.1x vs 7x
  • Shoots much slower: 11 fps vs 40 fps
  • Significantly thicker: 2.2" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the D-Lux (Typ 109) and EX-ZR10

  • Great zoom: 3.1x vs 7x
  • Fairly small: Mid size (118×66×55 mm) vs Compact (102×69×27 mm)
  • Thin: 2.2" vs 1.1"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-ZR10 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 5 MP), shoots faster continuously (40 fps vs 30 fps) and is slightly lighter (176 g vs 205 g).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), is slightly larger (compact (102×69×27 mm) vs compact (105×59×29 mm)), is older (september 2010 vs january 2013) and is slightly more expensive ($642.18 vs $339.73).

Casio Exilim ZR400

Casio Exilim ZR400
2 years newer
$340

Significant advantages of the ZR400 (vs the EX-ZR10)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the ZR400 (vs the EX-ZR10)

  • Shoots significantly slower: 30 fps vs 40 fps
  • Lower true resolution: 5 MP vs 9.8 MP

common strengths of the ZR400 and EX-ZR10

  • Very small: Compact (105×59×29 mm) vs Compact (102×69×27 mm)
  • Very fast continuous shooting: 30 fps vs 40 fps
  • Very light: 205 g vs 176 g