Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 Competitors

7x, f/3, 28 mm
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        As well as being compared against other compacts, the Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 is also often compared to boutiques and travel zooms. The Casio Exilim EX-ZR10's top rivals come from Casio (such as the Exilim ZR15 and the Exilim ZR400) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-LX3)

        Competitor classes

        compared toCompact competitors

        Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-ZR10 compared to other compact competitors include: it shoots faster continuously (40 fps vs 3 fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), is thinner (1.1" vs 1.6") and is significantly lighter (176 g vs 265 g).

        However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3 vs f/2), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,228k dots), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 20 MP).

        Casio Exilim ZR15

        Casio Exilim EX-ZR15
        1 year newer

        Significant advantages of the ZR15 (vs the EX-ZR10)

        • Much smaller: Compact (102×59×27 mm) vs Compact (102×69×27 mm)

        Significant disadvantages of the ZR15 (vs the EX-ZR10)

        • Shoots much slower: 3 fps vs 40 fps

        common strengths of the ZR15 and EX-ZR10

        • Very small: Compact (102×59×27 mm) vs Compact (102×69×27 mm)
        • Light weight: 176 g vs 176 g
        • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"
        arrow Compare the ZR15 vs the EX-ZR10

        Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

        Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3
        2 years older
        $778

        Significant advantages of the DMC-LX3 (vs the EX-ZR10)

        • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
        • Significantly wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3
        • Smaller: Compact (109×60×27 mm) vs Compact (102×69×27 mm)

        Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX3 (vs the EX-ZR10)

        • Shoots much slower: 2.5 fps vs 40 fps
        • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
        • Much heavier: 265 g vs 176 g

        common strengths of the DMC-LX3 and EX-ZR10

        • Very small: Compact (109×60×27 mm) vs Compact (102×69×27 mm)
        • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"
        arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 vs the Casio Exilim EX-ZR10

        Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

        Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV
        4 years newer
        $650 - $898

        Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the EX-ZR10)

        • Significantly wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3
        • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
        • Much higher resolution screen: 1,228k dots vs 460k dots

        Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the EX-ZR10)

        • Much larger: Compact (102×58×41 mm) vs Compact (102×69×27 mm)
        • Shoots much slower: 16 fps vs 40 fps
        • Much heavier: 298 g vs 176 g

        common strengths of the DSC-RX100 IV and EX-ZR10

        • Fast continuous shooting: 16 fps vs 40 fps
        arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV vs the Casio Exilim EX-ZR10

        compared toBoutique competitors

        Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-ZR10 compared to boutique competitors include: it has way more more zoom (7x vs 3.1x), is slightly smaller (compact (102×69×27 mm) vs mid size (118×66×55 mm)), shoots faster continuously (40 fps vs 11 fps), is thinner (1.1" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (176 g vs 405 g).

        However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/3 vs f/1.7), has a much narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.16x4.62mm vs four thirds 17.3x13mm).

        Leica D-Lux (Typ 109)

        Leica D-Lux (Typ 109)
        4 years newer
        $895 - $966

        Significant advantages of the D-Lux (Typ 109) (vs the EX-ZR10)

        • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
        • Much wider aperture: f/1.7 vs f/3
        • Better image stabilization:
          1. Lens
          vs
          1. Sensor shift

        Significant disadvantages of the D-Lux (Typ 109) (vs the EX-ZR10)

        • Much less zoom: 3.1x vs 7x
        • Shoots much slower: 11 fps vs 40 fps
        • Significantly thicker: 2.2" vs 1.1"

        common strengths of the D-Lux (Typ 109) and EX-ZR10

        • Great zoom: 3.1x vs 7x
        • Fairly small: Mid size (118×66×55 mm) vs Compact (102×69×27 mm)
        • Thin: 2.2" vs 1.1"
        arrow Compare the Leica D-Lux (Typ 109) vs the Casio Exilim EX-ZR10

        compared toTravel zoom competitors

        Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-ZR10 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 5 MP), shoots faster continuously (40 fps vs 30 fps) and is slightly lighter (176 g vs 205 g).

        However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), is slightly larger (compact (102×69×27 mm) vs compact (105×59×29 mm)), is older (september 2010 vs january 2013) and is slightly more expensive ($642.18 vs $339.73).

        Casio Exilim ZR400

        Casio Exilim ZR400
        2 years newer
        $340

        Significant advantages of the ZR400 (vs the EX-ZR10)

        • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

        Significant disadvantages of the ZR400 (vs the EX-ZR10)

        • Shoots significantly slower: 30 fps vs 40 fps
        • Lower true resolution: 5 MP vs 9.8 MP

        common strengths of the ZR400 and EX-ZR10

        • Very small: Compact (105×59×29 mm) vs Compact (102×69×27 mm)
        • Very fast continuous shooting: 30 fps vs 40 fps
        • Very light: 205 g vs 176 g
        arrow Compare the ZR400 vs the EX-ZR10