As well as being compared against other compacts, the Casio Exilim EX-Z750 is also often compared to ultra compacts and travel zooms. The Casio Exilim EX-Z750's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot A3400 IS and the PowerShot SD20) and Casio (such as the Exilim EX-Z1100 and the Exilim EX-Z800)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z750 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none) and much longer exposures (60 seconds vs 15 seconds).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 28 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2.5" vs 3"), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), takes slightly lower resolution photos (7.1 MP vs 9.7 MP) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Canon PowerShot A3400 IS

Canon PowerShot A3400 IS
7 years newer
$215

Significant advantages of the A3400 IS (vs the EX-Z750)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Larger screen: 3" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the A3400 IS (vs the EX-Z750)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel
  • Much shorter max exposures: 15 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the A3400 IS and EX-Z750

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×56×21 mm) vs Super compact (89×59×22 mm)

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z750 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.2), has a slightly larger screen (2.5" vs 1.5"), has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none) and much longer exposures (60 seconds vs 4 seconds).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 27 mm), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift), is older (february 2005 vs august 2010), is thicker (0.9" vs 0.7") and is slightly heavier (165 g vs 124 g).

Canon PowerShot SD20

Placeholder
4 months older
$139

Significant advantages of the SD20 (vs the EX-Z750)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD20 (vs the EX-Z750)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD20 and EX-Z750

  • None found

Casio Exilim EX-Z800

Casio Exilim EX-Z800
5 years newer

Significant advantages of the EX-Z800 (vs the EX-Z750)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z800 (vs the EX-Z750)

  • None found

common strengths of the EX-Z800 and EX-Z750

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z750 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is much smaller (super compact (89×59×22 mm) vs compact (108×62×37 mm)), is thinner (0.9" vs 1.4"), is significantly lighter (165 g vs 256 g), has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none) and much longer exposures (60 seconds vs 15 seconds).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2.5" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (115k dots vs 920k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs digital) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (7.1 MP vs 9.7 MP).

Casio Exilim EX-Z1100

Casio Exilim EX-Z1100
8 years newer

Significant advantages of the EX-Z1100 (vs the EX-Z750)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 38 mm
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 400 ISO
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z1100 (vs the EX-Z750)

  • Much larger: Compact (108×62×37 mm) vs Super compact (89×59×22 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.4" vs 0.9"
  • Significantly heavier: 256 g vs 165 g

common strengths of the EX-Z1100 and EX-Z750

  • Fairly small: Compact (108×62×37 mm) vs Super compact (89×59×22 mm)
  • Thin: 1.4" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 256 g vs 165 g