Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z35 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (super compact 99x57x20 mm vs compact 104x63x33 mm), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.3") and is much lighter (124 g vs 204 g).
However, on average it has significantly less zoom (3x vs 15x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a significantly smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0") and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,000 fps).
Casio Exilim EX-FH100
similar age
|
Significant advantages of the EX-FH100 (vs the EX-Z35)
- Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
- Records high-speed movies: 1,000 fps vs None
- Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
Significant disadvantages of the EX-FH100 (vs the EX-Z35)
- Significantly larger: Compact 104x60x28 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
- Much heavier: 201 g vs 124 g
- Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.8"
common strengths of the EX-FH100 and EX-Z35
|
|
|
|
Casio Exilim ZR100
1 year newer
$231 - $411
|
Significant advantages of the ZR100 (vs the EX-Z35)
- Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
- Records high-speed movies: 1,000 fps vs None
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
Significant disadvantages of the ZR100 (vs the EX-Z35)
- Significantly larger: Compact 105x59x29 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
- Much heavier: 204 g vs 124 g
- Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.8"
common strengths of the ZR100 and EX-Z35
|
|
|
|
Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR
10 months newer
$225 - $229
|
Significant advantages of the F500 EXR (vs the EX-Z35)
- Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
- Much more zoom: 15x vs 3x
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
Significant disadvantages of the F500 EXR (vs the EX-Z35)
- Much larger: Compact 104x63x33 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
- Much heavier: 215 g vs 124 g
- Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.8"
common strengths of the F500 EXR and EX-Z35
|
|
|
|
Casio Exilim EX-ZS100
1 year newer
$194 - $223
|
Significant advantages of the EX-ZS100 (vs the EX-Z35)
- Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
- Significantly more zoom: 12.5x vs 3x
- Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm
Significant disadvantages of the EX-ZS100 (vs the EX-Z35)
- Significantly larger: Compact 102x58x28 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
- Significantly heavier: 185 g vs 124 g
- Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.8"
common strengths of the EX-ZS100 and EX-Z35
|
|
|
|