As well as being compared against other compacts, the Casio Exilim EX-Z35 is also often compared to ultra compacts, travel zooms and entry-level DSLRs. The Casio Exilim EX-Z35's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix AX350 and the FinePix JX400) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S6200 and the Coolpix S3100)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z35 compared to other compact competitors include: it is slightly smaller (super compact 99x57x20 mm vs compact 103x58x32 mm), takes significantly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 5 MP), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.3") and is slightly lighter (124 g vs 168 g).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.1 vs f/2.6), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs digital) and slightly worse macro focusing (10 cm vs 5 cm).

Fujifilm FinePix AX350

Fujifilm FinePix AX350
1 year newer
$95 - $128

Significant advantages of the AX350 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Image stabilization: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the AX350 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Larger: Compact 93x60x27 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.8"
  • Significantly heavier: 168 g vs 124 g

common strengths of the AX350 and EX-Z35

  • Inexpensive: $95.15 vs $108.49
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix AX350 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Fujifilm FinePix JX400

Fujifilm FinePix JX400
1 year newer
$201 - $231

Significant advantages of the JX400 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.1
  • Image stabilization: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the JX400 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • None found

common strengths of the JX400 and EX-Z35

  • Light weight: 130 g vs 124 g
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix JX400 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Canon PowerShot A530

Canon PowerShot A530
4 years older

Significant advantages of the A530 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.1
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the A530 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much lower true resolution: 5 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 2.5"
  • Much larger: Compact 90x64x43 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm

common strengths of the A530 and EX-Z35

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot A530 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Nikon Coolpix P300

Nikon Coolpix P300
1 year newer
$277

Significant advantages of the P300 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.1
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the P300 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 103x58x32 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.8"
  • Significantly heavier: 189 g vs 124 g

common strengths of the P300 and EX-Z35

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P300 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Casio Exilim EX-Z16

Casio Exilim EX-Z16
7 months newer
$144

Significant advantages of the EX-Z16 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z16 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • None found

common strengths of the EX-Z16 and EX-Z35

  • Fairly small: Super compact 101x59x20 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.8"
  • Inexpensive: $143.95 vs $108.49
arrow Compare the EX-Z16 vs the EX-Z35

Canon PowerShot A2200

Canon PowerShot A2200
10 months newer
$79 - $142

Significant advantages of the A2200 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 10 cm
  • Has boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs None

Significant disadvantages of the A2200 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • None found

common strengths of the A2200 and EX-Z35

  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x55x22 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Light weight: 135 g vs 124 g
  • Inexpensive: $79.00 vs $108.49
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot A2200 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z35 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 8 MP), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO) and is newer (february, 2010 vs january, 2008).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), has a significantly smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0"), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs digital), doesn't have a touch screen and is not waterproof.

Casio Exilim EX-Z33

Casio Exilim EX-Z33
5 months older
$100 - $144

Significant advantages of the EX-Z33 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z33 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • None found

common strengths of the EX-Z33 and EX-Z35

  • Capture very high resolution images: 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Fast max shutter speeds: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second
arrow Compare the EX-Z33 vs the EX-Z35

Nikon Coolpix S3100

Nikon Coolpix S3100
1 year newer
$77 - $80

Significant advantages of the S3100 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S3100 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • None found

common strengths of the S3100 and EX-Z35

  • Fast max shutter speeds: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S3100 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Samsung PL120

Samsung PL120
1 year newer
$98 - $140

Significant advantages of the PL120 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a touch screen
  • Image stabilization: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the PL120 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • None found

common strengths of the PL120 and EX-Z35

  • None found
arrow Compare the Samsung PL120 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Casio Exilim EX-S880

Casio Exilim EX-S880
2 years older

Significant advantages of the EX-S880 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Significantly larger screen: 2.8" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the EX-S880 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much lower true resolution: 8 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly worse macro capability: 15 cm vs 10 cm

common strengths of the EX-S880 and EX-Z35

  • Fast max shutter speeds: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second
arrow Compare the EX-S880 vs the EX-Z35

Casio Exilim EX-S10

Casio Exilim EX-S10
2 years older
$135

Significant advantages of the EX-S10 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the EX-S10 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Significantly worse macro capability: 15 cm vs 10 cm

common strengths of the EX-S10 and EX-Z35

  • Capture very high resolution images: 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Fast max shutter speeds: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second
arrow Compare the EX-S10 vs the EX-Z35

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5
similar age
$248 - $332

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX5 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX5 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX5 and EX-Z35

  • Capture very high resolution images: 9.9 MP vs 9.8 MP
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z35 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (super compact 99x57x20 mm vs compact 104x63x33 mm), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.3"), is significantly lighter (124 g vs 215 g) and is slightly less expensive ($108.49 vs $233.00).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (3x vs 15x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a significantly smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0") and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 320 fps).

Nikon Coolpix S6200

Nikon Coolpix S6200
1 year newer
$144 - $167

Significant advantages of the S6200 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • More zoom: 10x vs 3x

Significant disadvantages of the S6200 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Thicker: 1" vs 0.8"
  • Heavier: 160 g vs 124 g

common strengths of the S6200 and EX-Z35

  • Fairly small: Compact 93x58x26 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Light weight: 160 g vs 124 g
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.8"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S6200 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR
10 months newer
$233 - $331

Significant advantages of the F500 EXR (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much more zoom: 15x vs 3x
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the F500 EXR (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much larger: Compact 104x63x33 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Much heavier: 215 g vs 124 g
  • Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the F500 EXR and EX-Z35

  • None found
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1
6 months older

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZR1 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZR1 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Thicker: 1" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the DMC-ZR1 and EX-Z35

  • Fairly small: Compact 98x55x26 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Light weight: 158 g vs 124 g
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.8"
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z35 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it is much smaller (super compact 99x57x20 mm vs prosumer size 125x97x68 mm), is thinner (0.8" vs 2.7") and is much lighter (124 g vs 580 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 20fps), has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0"), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 15.1 MP).

Pentax K-r

Pentax K-r
6 months newer
$649 (body only)
$540 - $579 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the K-r (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the K-r (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size 125x97x68 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Much thicker: 2.7" vs 0.8"
  • Much heavier: 598 g vs 124 g

common strengths of the K-r and EX-Z35

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 125x97x68 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Thin: 2.7" vs 0.8"
arrow Compare the Pentax K-r vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Pentax K-x

Pentax K-x
5 months older
$603 - $641 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the K-x (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the K-x (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size 123x92x68 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Much thicker: 2.7" vs 0.8"
  • Much heavier: 580 g vs 124 g

common strengths of the K-x and EX-Z35

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 123x92x68 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Thin: 2.7" vs 0.8"
arrow Compare the Pentax K-x vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Canon Rebel T1i

Canon EOS Rebel T1i
1 year older
$445 - $629 (body only)
$504 - $609 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T1i (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T1i (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Much thicker: 2.4" vs 0.8"
  • Much heavier: 520 g vs 124 g

common strengths of the T1i and EX-Z35

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Very thin: 2.4" vs 0.8"
  • Light weight: 520 g vs 124 g
arrow Compare the Canon EOS Rebel T1i vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35