Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z35 compared to other compact competitors include: it is slightly smaller (super compact 99x57x20 mm vs compact 103x58x32 mm), takes significantly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 5 MP), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.3") and is slightly lighter (124 g vs 168 g).
However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.1 vs f/2.6), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs digital) and slightly worse macro focusing (10 cm vs 5 cm).
Fujifilm FinePix AX350
1 year newer
$95 - $128
|
Significant advantages of the AX350 (vs the EX-Z35)
- Image stabilization: Digital vs None
Significant disadvantages of the AX350 (vs the EX-Z35)
- Larger: Compact 93x60x27 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
- Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.8"
- Significantly heavier: 168 g vs 124 g
common strengths of the AX350 and EX-Z35
- Inexpensive: $95.15 vs $108.49
|
|
|
|
Fujifilm FinePix JX400
1 year newer
$201 - $231
|
Significant advantages of the JX400 (vs the EX-Z35)
- Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
- Wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.1
- Image stabilization: Digital vs None
Significant disadvantages of the JX400 (vs the EX-Z35)
common strengths of the JX400 and EX-Z35
- Light weight: 130 g vs 124 g
|
|
|
|
Canon PowerShot A530
4 years older
|
Significant advantages of the A530 (vs the EX-Z35)
- Wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.1
- Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None
- Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm
Significant disadvantages of the A530 (vs the EX-Z35)
- Much lower true resolution: 5 MP vs 9.8 MP
- Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 2.5"
- Much larger: Compact 90x64x43 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
common strengths of the A530 and EX-Z35
|
|
|
|
Nikon Coolpix P300
1 year newer
$277
|
Significant advantages of the P300 (vs the EX-Z35)
- Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
- Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.1
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
Significant disadvantages of the P300 (vs the EX-Z35)
- Significantly larger: Compact 103x58x32 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
- Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.8"
- Significantly heavier: 189 g vs 124 g
common strengths of the P300 and EX-Z35
|
|
|
|
Casio Exilim EX-Z16
7 months newer
$144
|
Significant advantages of the EX-Z16 (vs the EX-Z35)
- Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None
Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z16 (vs the EX-Z35)
common strengths of the EX-Z16 and EX-Z35
- Fairly small: Super compact 101x59x20 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
- Thin: 0.8" vs 0.8"
- Inexpensive: $143.95 vs $108.49
|
|
|
|
Canon PowerShot A2200
10 months newer
$79 - $142
|
Significant advantages of the A2200 (vs the EX-Z35)
- Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
- Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 10 cm
- Has boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs None
Significant disadvantages of the A2200 (vs the EX-Z35)
common strengths of the A2200 and EX-Z35
- Fairly small: Super compact 93x55x22 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
- Light weight: 135 g vs 124 g
- Inexpensive: $79.00 vs $108.49
|
|
|
|