As well as being compared against other compacts, the Casio Exilim EX-Z35 is also often compared to ultra compacts, super zooms, entry-level DSLRs and travel zooms. The Casio Exilim EX-Z35's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot A2200 and the PowerShot A800) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S3300 and the Coolpix L120)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z35 compared to other compact competitors include: it is slightly lighter (124 g vs 167 g) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2.5" vs 2.7"), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift) and slightly worse macro focusing (10 cm vs 5 cm).

Canon PowerShot A2200

Canon PowerShot A2200
10 months newer
$147

Significant advantages of the A2200 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 10 cm
  • Has boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs None

Significant disadvantages of the A2200 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • None found

common strengths of the A2200 and EX-Z35

  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x55x22 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Light weight: 135 g vs 124 g
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot A2200 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Casio Exilim EX-Z16

Casio Exilim EX-Z16
7 months newer
$139

Significant advantages of the EX-Z16 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z16 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • None found

common strengths of the EX-Z16 and EX-Z35

  • Fairly small: Super compact 101x59x20 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.8"
arrow Compare the EX-Z16 vs the EX-Z35

Nikon Coolpix S3300

Nikon Coolpix S3300
1 year newer
$120

Significant advantages of the S3300 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S3300 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • None found

common strengths of the S3300 and EX-Z35

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x58x19 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Light weight: 128 g vs 124 g
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.8"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S3300 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980
1 year older

Significant advantages of the DSC-S980 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-S980 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Heavier: 167 g vs 124 g

common strengths of the DSC-S980 and EX-Z35

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S980 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2
similar age
$232

Significant advantages of the DMC-FP2 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Has boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs None
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FP2 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-FP2 and EX-Z35

  • Fairly small: Super compact 99x59x19 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.8"
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Canon PowerShot A800

Canon PowerShot A800
1 year newer
$84 - $90

Significant advantages of the A800 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the A800 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 94x61x31 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Much thicker: 1.2" vs 0.8"
  • Significantly heavier: 186 g vs 124 g

common strengths of the A800 and EX-Z35

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot A800 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z35 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 8 MP), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO) and is newer (february, 2010 vs august, 2009).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), has a significantly smaller screen (2.5" vs 2.8"), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Olympus VG110

Olympus VG-110
1 year newer
$88

Significant advantages of the VG110 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 27 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the VG110 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • None found

common strengths of the VG110 and EX-Z35

  • None found
arrow Compare the Olympus VG-110 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310
similar age
$111 - $127

Significant advantages of the DSC-W310 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W310 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-W310 and EX-Z35

  • Capture very high resolution images: 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Casio Exilim EX-Z90

Casio Exilim EX-Z90
6 months older
$154

Significant advantages of the EX-Z90 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z90 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • None found

common strengths of the EX-Z90 and EX-Z35

  • Capture very high resolution images: 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
arrow Compare the EX-Z90 vs the EX-Z35

Casio Exilim EX-Z33

Casio Exilim EX-Z33
5 months older

Significant advantages of the EX-Z33 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z33 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • None found

common strengths of the EX-Z33 and EX-Z35

  • Capture very high resolution images: 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
arrow Compare the EX-Z33 vs the EX-Z35

Casio Exilim EX-S880

Casio Exilim EX-S880
2 years older

Significant advantages of the EX-S880 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Significantly larger screen: 2.8" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the EX-S880 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much lower true resolution: 8 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm

common strengths of the EX-S880 and EX-Z35

  • None found
arrow Compare the EX-S880 vs the EX-Z35

Nikon Coolpix S3100

Nikon Coolpix S3100
1 year newer
$132

Significant advantages of the S3100 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the S3100 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • None found

common strengths of the S3100 and EX-Z35

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S3100 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z35 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is much smaller (super compact 99x57x20 mm vs large 131x97x126 mm), is thinner (0.8" vs 5") and is much lighter (124 g vs 687 g).

However, on average it has way more less zoom (3x vs 30x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0") and has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots).

Nikon Coolpix L120

Nikon Coolpix L120
1 year newer
$180 - $215

Significant advantages of the L120 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the L120 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 110x77x78 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.8"
  • Much heavier: 406 g vs 124 g

common strengths of the L120 and EX-Z35

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x77x78 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Light weight: 406 g vs 124 g
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 0.8"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L120 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR
1 year newer
$438 - $500

Significant advantages of the HS30 EXR (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 3x
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the HS30 EXR (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much larger: Large 131x97x126 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Much thicker: 5" vs 0.8"
  • Much heavier: 687 g vs 124 g

common strengths of the HS30 EXR and EX-Z35

  • None found
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z35 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it is much smaller (super compact 99x57x20 mm vs professional size 130x100x78 mm), is thinner (0.8" vs 3.1") and is much lighter (124 g vs 520 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 20fps), has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 15.1 MP) and has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs APS-C 22.3x14.9mm).

Canon Rebel T1i

Canon EOS Rebel T1i
1 year older
$475 - $629 (body only)
$549 - $580 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T1i (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T1i (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Much thicker: 2.4" vs 0.8"
  • Much heavier: 520 g vs 124 g

common strengths of the T1i and EX-Z35

  • Very small: Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Very thin: 2.4" vs 0.8"
  • Light weight: 520 g vs 124 g
arrow Compare the Canon EOS Rebel T1i vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Canon Rebel T3

Canon Rebel T3
1 year newer
$333 (body only)
$489 - $500 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.2x14.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T3 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much larger: Professional size 130x100x78 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.8"
  • Much heavier: 459 g vs 124 g

common strengths of the T3 and EX-Z35

  • Light weight: 459 g vs 124 g
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z35 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (super compact 99x57x20 mm vs compact 104x63x33 mm), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.3") and is much lighter (124 g vs 204 g).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (3x vs 15x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a significantly smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0") and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,000 fps).

Casio Exilim EX-FH100

Casio Exilim EX-FH100
similar age

Significant advantages of the EX-FH100 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 1,000 fps vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the EX-FH100 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 104x60x28 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Much heavier: 201 g vs 124 g
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the EX-FH100 and EX-Z35

  • None found
arrow Compare the EX-FH100 vs the EX-Z35

Casio Exilim ZR100

Casio Exilim EX-ZR100
1 year newer
$231 - $411

Significant advantages of the ZR100 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 1,000 fps vs None
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the ZR100 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x59x29 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Much heavier: 204 g vs 124 g
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the ZR100 and EX-Z35

  • None found
arrow Compare the ZR100 vs the EX-Z35

Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR
10 months newer
$225 - $229

Significant advantages of the F500 EXR (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much more zoom: 15x vs 3x
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the F500 EXR (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much larger: Compact 104x63x33 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Much heavier: 215 g vs 124 g
  • Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the F500 EXR and EX-Z35

  • None found
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Casio Exilim EX-ZS100

Casio Exilim EX-ZS100
1 year newer
$194 - $223

Significant advantages of the EX-ZS100 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 12.5x vs 3x
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the EX-ZS100 (vs the EX-Z35)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 102x58x28 mm vs Super compact 99x57x20 mm
  • Significantly heavier: 185 g vs 124 g
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the EX-ZS100 and EX-Z35

  • None found
arrow Compare the EX-ZS100 vs the EX-Z35