The Casio Exilim EX-Z33 is mostly gets compared to entry-level DSLRs and compacts. The Casio Exilim EX-Z33's top rivals come from Canon (such as the Rebel T5i) and HP (such as the Photosmart M537)

Competitor classes

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
3 years newer
$1,095 (body only)
$539 - $549 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the EX-Z33)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the EX-Z33)

  • None found

common strengths of the T5i and EX-Z33

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z33 compared to compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.5"), is much smaller (ultra compact (95×56×18 mm) vs compact (96×31×64 mm)), is newer (august 2009 vs march 2007), is thinner (0.7" vs 2.5") and is significantly lighter (106 g vs 165 g).

HP Photosmart M537

HP Photosmart M537
2 years older

Significant advantages of the M537 (vs the EX-Z33)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the M537 (vs the EX-Z33)

  • Much larger: Compact (96×31×64 mm) vs Ultra compact (95×56×18 mm)
  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3"
  • Much thicker: 2.5" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the M537 and EX-Z33

  • Very small: Compact (96×31×64 mm) vs Ultra compact (95×56×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 192 g vs 106 g

Fujifilm FinePix J30

Fujifilm FinePix J30
similar age

Significant advantages of the J30 (vs the EX-Z33)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 32 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the J30 (vs the EX-Z33)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1400 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the J30 and EX-Z33

  • Very small: Super compact (92×56×20 mm) vs Ultra compact (95×56×18 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Very light: 133 g vs 106 g

Casio Exilim EX-Z1050

Casio Exilim EX-Z1050
2 years older

Significant advantages of the EX-Z1050 (vs the EX-Z33)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z1050 (vs the EX-Z33)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.6" vs 3"
  • Much larger: Super compact (91×57×24 mm) vs Ultra compact (95×56×18 mm)
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 35 mm

common strengths of the EX-Z1050 and EX-Z33

  • Very small: Super compact (91×57×24 mm) vs Ultra compact (95×56×18 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Very light: 165 g vs 106 g