As well as being compared against other ultra compacts, the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 is also often compared to travel zooms, pro digicams and compacts. The Casio Exilim EX-Z2000's top rivals come from Samsung (such as the WB700) and Canon (such as the ELPH 310 HS and the ELPH 300 HS)

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z2000 compared to other ultra compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (26 mm vs 35 mm), has a significantly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.5"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it lacks a built in panoramas, is older (january, 2010 vs august, 2010), is slightly heavier (152 g vs 118 g) and is significantly more expensive ($312.77 vs $134.99).

Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS
similar age
$225

Significant advantages of the SD1400 IS (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD1400 IS (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the SD1400 IS and EX-Z2000

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Capture very high resolution images: 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000

Casio Exilim EX-Z800

Casio Exilim EX-Z800
6 months newer
$164 - $307

Significant advantages of the EX-Z800 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z800 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"

common strengths of the EX-Z800 and EX-Z2000

  • Capture very high resolution images: 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
arrow Compare the EX-Z800 vs the EX-Z2000

Nikon Coolpix S3100

Nikon Coolpix S3100
1 year newer
$125

Significant advantages of the S3100 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the S3100 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"

common strengths of the S3100 and EX-Z2000

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S3100 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
similar age

Significant advantages of the DSC-W320 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W320 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-W320 and EX-Z2000

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.8
  • Capture very high resolution images: 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000

Nikon Coolpix S220

Nikon Coolpix S220
1 year older

Significant advantages of the S220 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Significantly lighter: 100 g vs 152 g

Significant disadvantages of the S220 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 26 mm
  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.0"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift

common strengths of the S220 and EX-Z2000

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S220 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000

Sony Cybershot W570

Sony Cybershot DSC-W570
1 year newer
$135

Significant advantages of the W570 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Lighter: 116 g vs 152 g

Significant disadvantages of the W570 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the W570 and EX-Z2000

  • Wide aperture: f/2.6 vs f/2.8
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-W570 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z2000 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.1), has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 1.8"), takes significantly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 4 MP) and is thinner (0.7" vs 4.1").

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p vs 1080p @ 30fps), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p, has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Samsung WB700

Samsung WB700
1 year newer
$180 - $215

Significant advantages of the WB700 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • More zoom: 18x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the WB700 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • None found

common strengths of the WB700 and EX-Z2000

  • None found
arrow Compare the Samsung WB700 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
1 year newer
$195 - $196

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p
  • Supports 24p
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • None found

common strengths of the 310 HS and EX-Z2000

  • Wide aperture: f/3.0 vs f/2.8
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 310 HS vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000

Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ7
2 years newer
$281 - $406

Significant advantages of the DMC-SZ7 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-SZ7 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-SZ7 and EX-Z2000

  • None found
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ7 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000

Olympus VR320

Olympus VR-320
1 year newer
$145

Significant advantages of the VR320 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the VR320 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • None found

common strengths of the VR320 and EX-Z2000

  • Wide aperture: f/3.0 vs f/2.8
arrow Compare the Olympus VR-320 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000

Pentax Optio MX4

Placeholder
5 years older

Significant advantages of the MX4 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the MX4 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Much worse wide angle: 37 mm vs 26 mm
  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.0"
  • Much lower true resolution: 4 MP vs 9.8 MP

common strengths of the MX4 and EX-Z2000

  • Wide aperture: f/2.9 vs f/2.8
arrow Compare the Pentax Optio MX4 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000

Casio Exilim ZR100

Casio Exilim EX-ZR100
1 year newer
$302 - $468

Significant advantages of the ZR100 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Records high-speed movies: 1,000 fps vs None
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the ZR100 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • None found

common strengths of the ZR100 and EX-Z2000

  • Wide aperture: f/3.0 vs f/2.8
arrow Compare the ZR100 vs the EX-Z2000

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z2000 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.0" vs 1.8"), is significantly smaller (ultra compact 99x58x17 mm vs large 128x93x129 mm), is newer (january, 2010 vs july, 2005), is thinner (0.7" vs 5.1") and is significantly lighter (152 g vs 745 g).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a slightly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/2.0), takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 12 MP) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12
8 months newer
$398 - $496

Significant advantages of the G12 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the G12 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.0"
  • Larger: Mid size 112x76x48 mm vs Ultra compact 99x58x17 mm
  • Significantly heavier: 401 g vs 152 g

common strengths of the G12 and EX-Z2000

  • Inexpensive: $397.77 vs $312.77
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot G12 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000

Leica D-LUX 5

Leica D-LUX 5
8 months newer
$789

Significant advantages of the D-LUX 5 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/2.8

Significant disadvantages of the D-LUX 5 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • None found

common strengths of the D-LUX 5 and EX-Z2000

  • Fairly small: Compact 110x65x25 mm vs Ultra compact 99x58x17 mm
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Leica D-LUX 5 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000

Fujifilm FinePix S9000 Zoom

Fujifilm FinePix S9000 Zoom
4 years older

Significant advantages of the S9000 Zoom (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Has more storage slots: 2 vs 1

Significant disadvantages of the S9000 Zoom (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.0"
  • Much larger: Large 128x93x129 mm vs Ultra compact 99x58x17 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift

common strengths of the S9000 Zoom and EX-Z2000

  • None found
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix S9000 Zoom vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
1 year newer
$356 - $430

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Shoots RAW
  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/2.8

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • None found

common strengths of the S100 and EX-Z2000

  • Fairly small: Compact 99x60x28 mm vs Ultra compact 99x58x17 mm
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 198 g vs 152 g
arrow Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z2000 compared to compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (26 mm vs 28 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots), takes significantly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 6.1 MP) and is thinner (0.7" vs 0.9").

However, on average it doesn't record movies in 24p, has a slightly smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm), lacks boost light sensitivity (none vs 6,400 ISO), is slightly more expensive ($312.77 vs $177.99) and has fewer storage slots (1 vs 2).

Sony Cybershot W580

Sony Cybershot DSC-W580
1 year newer
$254

Significant advantages of the W580 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Has more storage slots: 2 vs 1

Significant disadvantages of the W580 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the W580 and EX-Z2000

  • Wide aperture: f/2.6 vs f/2.8
  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x56x19 mm vs Ultra compact 99x58x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-W580 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$149 - $179

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p
  • Supports 24p
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"

common strengths of the 300 HS and EX-Z2000

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.8
  • Fairly small: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Ultra compact 99x58x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 300 HS vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000

Olympus VG120

Olympus VG-120
1 year newer
$89

Significant advantages of the VG120 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the VG120 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • None found

common strengths of the VG120 and EX-Z2000

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x56x19 mm vs Ultra compact 99x58x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Olympus VG-120 vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000

Fujifilm FinePix F20 Zoom

Fujifilm FinePix F20 Zoom
3 years older

Significant advantages of the F20 Zoom (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm

Significant disadvantages of the F20 Zoom (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 26 mm
  • Much lower true resolution: 6.1 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.0"

common strengths of the F20 Zoom and EX-Z2000

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix F20 Zoom vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000

Casio Exilim EX-Z2300

Casio Exilim EX-Z2300
8 months newer
$277

Significant advantages of the EX-Z2300 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z2300 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the EX-Z2300 and EX-Z2000

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Fairly small: Super compact 101x59x20 mm vs Ultra compact 99x58x17 mm
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the EX-Z2300 vs the EX-Z2000

Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS
similar age
$178

Significant advantages of the SD1300 IS (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Has boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SD1300 IS (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the SD1300 IS and EX-Z2000

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Fairly small: Super compact 91x56x22 mm vs Ultra compact 99x58x17 mm
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS vs the Casio Exilim EX-Z2000