Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z2000 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.0" vs 1.8"), is significantly smaller (ultra compact 99x58x17 mm vs large 128x93x129 mm), is newer (january, 2010 vs july, 2005), is thinner (0.7" vs 5.1") and is significantly lighter (152 g vs 745 g).
However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a slightly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/2.0), takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 12 MP) and doesn't record movies in 24p.
Canon PowerShot G12
8 months newer
$398 - $496
|
Significant advantages of the G12 (vs the EX-Z2000)
- Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
- Shoots RAW
- Has a flip-out screen
Significant disadvantages of the G12 (vs the EX-Z2000)
- Smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.0"
- Larger: Mid size 112x76x48 mm vs Ultra compact 99x58x17 mm
- Significantly heavier: 401 g vs 152 g
common strengths of the G12 and EX-Z2000
- Inexpensive: $397.77 vs $312.77
|
|
|
|
Leica D-LUX 5
8 months newer
$789
|
Significant advantages of the D-LUX 5 (vs the EX-Z2000)
- Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
- Shoots RAW
- Significantly wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/2.8
Significant disadvantages of the D-LUX 5 (vs the EX-Z2000)
common strengths of the D-LUX 5 and EX-Z2000
- Fairly small: Compact 110x65x25 mm vs Ultra compact 99x58x17 mm
- Thin: 1" vs 0.7"
|
|
|
|
Fujifilm FinePix S9000 Zoom
4 years older
|
Significant advantages of the S9000 Zoom (vs the EX-Z2000)
- Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
- Shoots RAW
- Has more storage slots: 2 vs 1
Significant disadvantages of the S9000 Zoom (vs the EX-Z2000)
- Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.0"
- Much larger: Large 128x93x129 mm vs Ultra compact 99x58x17 mm
- No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
common strengths of the S9000 Zoom and EX-Z2000
|
|
|
|
Canon Powershot S100
1 year newer
$356 - $430
|
Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the EX-Z2000)
- Shoots RAW
- Much larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
- Significantly wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/2.8
Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the EX-Z2000)
common strengths of the S100 and EX-Z2000
- Fairly small: Compact 99x60x28 mm vs Ultra compact 99x58x17 mm
- Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"
- Light weight: 198 g vs 152 g
|
|
|
|