The Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 is mostly gets compared to other compacts. The Casio Exilim EX-Z2000's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cybershot DSC-RX100) and Canon (such as the PowerShot ELPH 110 HS)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-Z2000 compared to other compact competitors include: it is much smaller (super compact (101×58×20 mm) vs compact (102×58×36 mm)), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.4") and is slightly lighter (152 g vs 213 g).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/1.8), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,229k dots), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 20 MP) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
2 years newer
$403 - $448

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/2.8
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Much larger: Compact (102×58×36 mm) vs Super compact (101×58×20 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.4" vs 0.8"
  • Significantly heavier: 213 g vs 152 g

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and EX-Z2000

  • Wide aperture: f/1.8 vs f/2.8
  • Fairly small: Compact (102×58×36 mm) vs Super compact (101×58×20 mm)
  • Light weight: 213 g vs 152 g

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
2 years newer
$299

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the EX-Z2000)

  • None found

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and EX-Z2000

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.8
  • Very small: Super compact (93×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (101×58×20 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.8"