Casio Exilim EX-Z1080

3x, f/2.8, 38 mm
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        Summary Casio EX-Z1080

        Prices Price
        Camera only
        Unknown
        Score Snapsort rank
        Among similar cameras
        #n/a of 13
        Specifications Key specs
        Zoom
        Help 3x
        Screen size
        Help 2.6"
        Aperture
        Help f/2.8
        Screen resolution
        Help 115k dots
        Wide angle
        Help 38 mm
        Movie format
        Help 848 x 480 @ 30fps
        see all specifications
        Casio Exilim EX-Z1080Casio Exilim EX-Z1080

        gallery

        Explore our gallery of 23 sample photos taken by the Casio Exilim EX-Z1080.

        Pros

        Report a correction

        The Casio EX-Z1080 vs other recent compacts

        Built-in flash Built-in flash Help
        Usually standard
        Thickness Thin Help
        0.9"
        Size Quite small Help
        Super compact (91×57×24 mm)

        Cons

        Report a correction

        The Casio EX-Z1080 vs other recent compacts

        Zoom Poor zoom Help
        3x
        Screen resolution Low resolution screen Help
        115k dots
        Light sensitivity Very poor maximum light sensitivity Help
        3,200 ISO
        True resolution Lower true resolution Help
        8.9 MP
        Announced Old Help
        August 2007
        Popularity Not so popular Help
        Among snapsort users
        Wide angle Very poor wide angle lens Help
        38 mm
        Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
        Risk of blur
        Touch screen No touch screen Help
        More buttons
        Sensor type Sensor type Help
        CCD
        Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
        1/1000 of a second

        Appearance

        front photo of the Casio Exilim EX-Z1080back photo of the Casio Exilim EX-Z1080angle photo of the Casio Exilim EX-Z1080

        Discussion

        Casio Exilim EX-Z1080
        Exilim EX-Z1080
        Casio

        Report a correction

        Showing 0 comments