As well as being compared against other ultra compacts, the Casio Exilim EX-S200 is also often compared to waterproofs, travel zooms, compacts and entry-level DSLRs. The Casio Exilim EX-S200's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix TS25) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S8100)

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S200 compared to other ultra compact competitors include: it has a much wider wide angle lens (27 mm vs 38 mm), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 4.9 MP), is newer (august 2010 vs june 2005) and is significantly less expensive ($159.99 vs $481.61).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.2 vs f/2.6), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), doesn't have a touch screen and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Casio Exilim EX-S500

Casio Exilim EX-S500
5 years older

Significant advantages of the EX-S500 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the EX-S500 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

common strengths of the EX-S500 and EX-S200

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70
1 year newer
$482

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-WX70 and EX-S200

  • None found

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S200 compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/3.2 vs f/3.9) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1300 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (27 mm vs 25 mm), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), is older (august 2010 vs january 2013) and is not waterproof.

Panasonic Lumix TS25

Panasonic Lumix TS25
2 years newer
$140

Significant advantages of the TS25 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the TS25 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

common strengths of the TS25 and EX-S200

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S200 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (27 mm vs 30 mm), is significantly smaller (ultra compact (100×55×18 mm) vs compact (104×60×30 mm)), is thinner (0.7" vs 1.2"), is slightly lighter (132 g vs 209 g) and is significantly less expensive ($159.99 vs $499.00).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs LensSensor shift), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second).

Nikon Coolpix S8100

Nikon Coolpix S8100
similar age
$499

Significant advantages of the S8100 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    2. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the S8100 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 30 mm vs 27 mm
  • Significantly larger: Compact (104×60×30 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the S8100 and EX-S200

  • Fairly small: Compact (104×60×30 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.2" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 209 g vs 132 g

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S200 compared to compact competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (27 mm vs 32 mm), is slightly smaller (ultra compact (100×55×18 mm) vs compact (93×60×28 mm)), is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1") and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1400 of a second).

Fujifilm FinePix AV200

Fujifilm FinePix AV200
6 months newer
$61

Significant advantages of the AV200 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the AV200 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Much worse wide angle: 32 mm vs 27 mm
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the AV200 and EX-S200

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 168 g vs 132 g

Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS
5 months older
$160

Significant advantages of the SD1300 IS (vs the EX-S200)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the SD1300 IS (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD1300 IS and EX-S200

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (91×56×22 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S200 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), is much smaller (ultra compact (100×55×18 mm) vs professional size (133×100×79 mm)), is much less expensive ($159.99 vs $1,223.25), is thinner (0.7" vs 3.1") and is much lighter (132 g vs 575 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 20fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,040k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 17.9 MP) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
1 year newer
$1,223 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the EX-S200)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 20fps
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the EX-S200)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×79 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the T4i and EX-S200

  • None found