The Casio Exilim EX-S200 is mostly gets compared to waterproofs, entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms and compacts. The Casio Exilim EX-S200's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix TS25) and Canon (such as the PowerShot ELPH 140 IS)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S200 compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/3.2 vs f/3.9) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1300 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (27 mm vs 25 mm), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), is older (august 2010 vs january 2013) and is not waterproof.

Panasonic Lumix TS25

Panasonic Lumix TS25
2 years newer
$200

Significant advantages of the TS25 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the TS25 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

common strengths of the TS25 and EX-S200

  • None found

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S200 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it records lower quality movies (720p @ 20fps vs none), is newer (august 2010 vs january 2008), is much smaller (ultra compact (100×55×18 mm) vs professional size (142×101×72 mm)), is thinner (0.7" vs 2.8") and is much lighter (132 g vs 800 g).

However, on average it takes much lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 14.6 MP), has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.16x4.62mm vs APS-C 23.4x15.6mm), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs pentaprism), has a built-in lens and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Samsung GX-20

Samsung GX-20
2 years older

Significant advantages of the GX-20 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Much higher true resolution: 14.6 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the GX-20 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Much larger: Professional size (142×101×72 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Much thicker: 2.8" vs 0.7"
  • Much heavier: 800 g vs 132 g

common strengths of the GX-20 and EX-S200

  • Thin: 2.8" vs 0.7"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S200 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (ultra compact (100×55×18 mm) vs compact (104×59×29 mm)), is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1") and is slightly lighter (132 g vs 174 g).

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), is older (august 2010 vs february 2014) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second).

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the EX-S200)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

common strengths of the ELPH 140 IS and EX-S200

  • Very small: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Very light: 130 g vs 132 g

Nikon Coolpix S8100

Nikon Coolpix S8100
similar age

Significant advantages of the S8100 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    2. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the S8100 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 30 mm vs 27 mm
  • Significantly larger: Compact (104×60×30 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the S8100 and EX-S200

  • Very small: Compact (104×60×30 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.2" vs 0.7"
  • Very light: 209 g vs 132 g

Casio Exilim EX-H5

Casio Exilim EX-H5
similar age
$564

Significant advantages of the EX-H5 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 27 mm

Significant disadvantages of the EX-H5 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Significantly larger: Compact (104×59×29 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the EX-H5 and EX-S200

  • Very small: Compact (104×59×29 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"
  • Very light: 174 g vs 132 g

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S200 compared to compact competitors include: it has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.2 vs f/2.8), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3") and has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots).

Casio Exilim EX-Z2300

Casio Exilim EX-Z2300
similar age

Significant advantages of the EX-Z2300 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z2300 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the EX-Z2300 and EX-S200

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (101×59×20 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"