As well as being compared against other ultra compacts, the Casio Exilim EX-S200 is also often compared to pro digicams, travel zooms, compacts and entry-level DSLRs. The Casio Exilim EX-S200's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot S110) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-W350)

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S200 compared to other ultra compact competitors include: it has a much wider wide angle lens (27 mm vs 38 mm), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), is newer (august 2010 vs october 2005) and is slightly less expensive ($159.99 vs $343.36).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.2 vs f/2.7).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
6 months older
$343

Significant advantages of the DSC-W350 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W350 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-W350 and EX-S200

  • None found

Casio Exilim EX-S600

Casio Exilim EX-S600
4 years older

Significant advantages of the EX-S600 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the EX-S600 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

common strengths of the EX-S600 and EX-S200

  • None found

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S200 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it is slightly smaller (ultra compact (100×55×18 mm) vs compact (99×59×27 mm)), is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1"), is slightly lighter (132 g vs 198 g) and is slightly less expensive ($159.99 vs $358.99).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.2 vs f/2), has significantly less zoom (4x vs 5x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (27 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 461k dots) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110
2 years newer
$359

Significant advantages of the S110 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.2
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 27 mm

Significant disadvantages of the S110 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"
  • Heavier: 198 g vs 132 g

common strengths of the S110 and EX-S200

  • Great zoom: 5x vs 4x
  • Fairly small: Compact (99×59×27 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S200 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (ultra compact (100×55×18 mm) vs compact (104×60×30 mm)), is thinner (0.7" vs 1.2"), is significantly lighter (132 g vs 300 g) and is slightly less expensive ($159.99 vs $499.00).

However, on average it has way more less zoom (4x vs 21x), doesn't have a built-in GPS, has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 4.8"), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs LensSensor shift).

Nikon Coolpix S8100

Nikon Coolpix S8100
similar age
$499

Significant advantages of the S8100 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Much more zoom: 10x vs 4x
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the S8100 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 30 mm vs 27 mm
  • Significantly larger: Compact (104×60×30 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the S8100 and EX-S200

  • Very small: Compact (104×60×30 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.2" vs 0.7"
  • Very light: 209 g vs 132 g

Samsung Galaxy Camera

Samsung Galaxy Camera
2 years newer
$110

Significant advantages of the Camera (vs the EX-S200)

  • Much more zoom: 21x vs 4x
  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly better wide angle: 23 mm vs 27 mm

Significant disadvantages of the Camera (vs the EX-S200)

  • Larger: Compact (129×71×19 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Much heavier: 300 g vs 132 g

common strengths of the Camera and EX-S200

  • Very small: Compact (129×71×19 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Inexpensive: $109.99 vs $159.99

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S200 compared to compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/3.2 vs f/3.9), is slightly smaller (ultra compact (100×55×18 mm) vs compact (104×67×26 mm)), is thinner (0.7" vs 1") and is slightly lighter (132 g vs 179 g).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (4x vs 5x), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), is older (august 2010 vs january 2014) and is not waterproof.

Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Fujifilm FinePix XP70
3 years newer
$159

Significant advantages of the XP70 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly more zoom: 5x vs 4x
  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the XP70 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Significantly larger: Compact (104×67×26 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the XP70 and EX-S200

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.7"
  • Inexpensive: $159.00 vs $159.99

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S200 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it records lower quality movies (720p @ 20fps vs none), is newer (august 2010 vs january 2008), is much smaller (ultra compact (100×55×18 mm) vs professional size (142×101×72 mm)), is thinner (0.7" vs 2.8") and is much lighter (132 g vs 800 g).

However, on average it takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 14.6 MP), has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.16x4.62mm vs APS-C 23.4x15.6mm), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs pentaprism), has a built-in lens and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Samsung GX-20

Samsung GX-20
2 years older

Significant advantages of the GX-20 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Significantly higher true resolution: 14.6 MP vs 9.8 MP

Significant disadvantages of the GX-20 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Does not take movies: None vs 720p @ 20fps
  • Much larger: Professional size (142×101×72 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Much thicker: 2.8" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the GX-20 and EX-S200

  • Thin: 2.8" vs 0.7"