As well as being compared against other ultra compacts, the Casio Exilim EX-S200 is also often compared to waterproofs, travel zooms and compacts. The Casio Exilim EX-S200's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix S8100 and the Coolpix S220) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix J10)

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S200 compared to other ultra compact competitors include: it records lower quality movies (720p @ 20fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps), has a much wider wide angle lens (27 mm vs 35 mm), has a slightly larger screen (2.7" vs 2.5"), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and is newer (august 2010 vs january 2008).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.2 vs f/2.7) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Fujifilm FinePix J10

Fujifilm FinePix J10
2 years older

Significant advantages of the J10 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the J10 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

common strengths of the J10 and EX-S200

  • None found

Casio Exilim EX-S500

Casio Exilim EX-S500
5 years older

Significant advantages of the EX-S500 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the EX-S500 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

common strengths of the EX-S500 and EX-S200

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S220

Nikon Coolpix S220
1 year older
$150

Significant advantages of the S220 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S220 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

common strengths of the S220 and EX-S200

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70
1 year newer
$242

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-WX70 and EX-S200

  • None found

Casio Exilim EX-S10

Casio Exilim EX-S10
2 years older

Significant advantages of the EX-S10 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the EX-S10 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

common strengths of the EX-S10 and EX-S200

  • None found

Casio Exilim EX-S600

Casio Exilim EX-S600
4 years older

Significant advantages of the EX-S600 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the EX-S600 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

common strengths of the EX-S600 and EX-S200

  • None found

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S200 compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/3.2 vs f/3.9) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1300 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (27 mm vs 25 mm), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), is older (august 2010 vs january 2013) and is not waterproof.

Panasonic Lumix TS25

Panasonic Lumix TS25
2 years newer
$157

Significant advantages of the TS25 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the TS25 (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

common strengths of the TS25 and EX-S200

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S200 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (ultra compact (100×55×18 mm) vs compact (129×71×19 mm)), is thinner (0.7" vs 1.2"), is significantly lighter (132 g vs 231 g) and is slightly less expensive ($159.99 vs $492.00).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (4x vs 20x), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (720p @ 20fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 4.8") and has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots).

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the EX-S200)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Longer exposures: 15 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

common strengths of the ELPH 140 IS and EX-S200

  • Very small: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Very light: 130 g vs 132 g

Nikon Coolpix S8100

Nikon Coolpix S8100
similar age
$499

Significant advantages of the S8100 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 20fps
  • Significantly larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the S8100 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 30 mm vs 27 mm
  • Significantly larger: Compact (104×60×30 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the S8100 and EX-S200

  • None found

Samsung Galaxy Camera

Samsung Galaxy Camera
2 years newer
$110

Significant advantages of the Camera (vs the EX-S200)

  • Much larger screen: 4.8" vs 2.7"
  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly better wide angle: 23 mm vs 27 mm

Significant disadvantages of the Camera (vs the EX-S200)

  • Significantly larger: Compact (129×71×19 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Much heavier: 300 g vs 132 g

common strengths of the Camera and EX-S200

  • Fairly small: Compact (129×71×19 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
1 year newer
$492

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the EX-S200)

  • Has a GPS
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 4x

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the EX-S200)

  • Much larger: Compact (106×61×33 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.7"
  • Significantly heavier: 231 g vs 132 g

common strengths of the SX260 HS and EX-S200

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S200 compared to compact competitors include: it has a much wider wide angle lens (27 mm vs 36 mm), has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and is thinner (0.7" vs 0.9").

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.2 vs f/2.8) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon PowerShot A2300 IS

Canon PowerShot A2300 IS
1 year newer
$275

Significant advantages of the A2300 IS (vs the EX-S200)

  • Longer exposures: 15 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the A2300 IS (vs the EX-S200)

  • None found

common strengths of the A2300 IS and EX-S200

  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×54×20 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 125 g vs 132 g

Casio Exilim EX-S12

Casio Exilim EX-S12
1 year older

Significant advantages of the EX-S12 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the EX-S12 (vs the EX-S200)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 27 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the EX-S12 and EX-S200

  • Fairly small: Compact (95×60×23 mm) vs Ultra compact (100×55×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 111 g vs 132 g