As well as being compared against other ultra compacts, the Casio Exilim EX-S10 is also often compared to compacts, digicams and travel zooms. The Casio Exilim EX-S10's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SD1000 and the PowerShot SD890 IS) and Casio (such as the Exilim EX-S5)

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S10 compared to other ultra compact competitors include: it takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 7.1 MP), is newer (january 2008 vs february 2007), is thinner (0.6" vs 0.7"), is slightly lighter (113 g vs 175 g) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second).

However, on average it doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel) and slightly shorter exposures (4 seconds vs 15 seconds).

Canon PowerShot SD1000

Canon PowerShot SD1000
10 months older
$670

Significant advantages of the SD1000 (vs the EX-S10)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD1000 (vs the EX-S10)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD1000 and EX-S10

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S10 compared to compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.3), is slightly smaller (ultra compact (94×55×15 mm) vs compact (95×57×27 mm)), is thinner (0.6" vs 1.1"), is slightly lighter (113 g vs 195 g) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (36 mm vs 29 mm), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), is older (january 2008 vs january 2009), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel) and much shorter exposures (4 seconds vs 60 seconds).

Canon PowerShot SD890 IS

Canon PowerShot SD890 IS
similar age

Significant advantages of the SD890 IS (vs the EX-S10)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SD890 IS (vs the EX-S10)

  • Significantly larger: Compact (95×57×27 mm) vs Ultra compact (94×55×15 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.1" vs 0.6"
  • Significantly heavier: 195 g vs 113 g

common strengths of the SD890 IS and EX-S10

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Compact (95×57×27 mm) vs Ultra compact (94×55×15 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.6"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the DMC-FS15 (vs the EX-S10)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 29 mm vs 36 mm
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FS15 (vs the EX-S10)

  • Significantly thicker: 0.9" vs 0.6"

common strengths of the DMC-FS15 and EX-S10

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (97×54×22 mm) vs Ultra compact (94×55×15 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.6"

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S10 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.1), has a slightly higher resolution screen (230k dots vs 114k dots), is slightly smaller (ultra compact (94×55×15 mm) vs prosumer size (102×35×220 mm)) and is thinner (0.6" vs 8.7").

However, on average it is older (january 2008 vs january 2009).

Casio Exilim EX-S5

Casio Exilim EX-S5
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the EX-S5 (vs the EX-S10)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the EX-S5 (vs the EX-S10)

  • Much thicker: 8.7" vs 0.6"

common strengths of the EX-S5 and EX-S10

  • Light weight: 100 g vs 113 g

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-S10 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.2), is slightly smaller (ultra compact (94×55×15 mm) vs super compact (95×54×22 mm)) and is thinner (0.6" vs 0.9").

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (36 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs digital), is older (january 2008 vs january 2015), is significantly more expensive ($564.04 vs $134.47) and slightly shorter exposures (4 seconds vs 15 seconds).

Canon PowerShot ELPH 160

Canon PowerShot ELPH 160
7 years newer
$134

Significant advantages of the ELPH 160 (vs the EX-S10)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 36 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 160 (vs the EX-S10)

  • Significantly thicker: 0.9" vs 0.6"

common strengths of the ELPH 160 and EX-S10

  • Very small: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Ultra compact (94×55×15 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.6"
  • Very light: 127 g vs 113 g