As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Casio Exilim EX-G1 is also often compared to mirrorless, entry-level DSLRs and travel zooms. The Casio Exilim EX-G1's top rivals come from Olympus (such as the TG-620 and the Stylus Tough-3000) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-TS3 and the Lumix DMC-ZR1)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-G1 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), is thinner (0.8" vs 0.9") and is slightly lighter (154 g vs 197 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and lacks a built in panoramas.

Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100
1 year newer
$280

Significant advantages of the AW100 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None

Significant disadvantages of the AW100 (vs the EX-G1)

  • None found

common strengths of the AW100 and EX-G1

  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix AW100 vs the Casio Exilim EX-G1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the DMC-TS3 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TS3 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 104x63x27 mm vs Compact 104x64x20 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the DMC-TS3 and EX-G1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 vs the Casio Exilim EX-G1

Fujifilm FinePix XP30

Fujifilm FinePix XP30
1 year newer
$114 - $159

Significant advantages of the XP30 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the XP30 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"

common strengths of the XP30 and EX-G1

  • Inexpensive: $113.88 vs $189.99
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix XP30 vs the Casio Exilim EX-G1

Olympus TG-620

Olympus TG-620
2 years newer
$305 - $324

Significant advantages of the TG-620 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None

Significant disadvantages of the TG-620 (vs the EX-G1)

  • None found

common strengths of the TG-620 and EX-G1

  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
  • Fairly small: Compact 98x65x21 mm vs Compact 104x64x20 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.8"
arrow Compare the Olympus TG-620 vs the Casio Exilim EX-G1

Olympus Stylus Tough-3000

Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
similar age
$188

Significant advantages of the Tough-3000 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None
  • Much better macro capability: 2 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the Tough-3000 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"

common strengths of the Tough-3000 and EX-G1

  • Inexpensive: $187.99 vs $189.99
arrow Compare the Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 vs the Casio Exilim EX-G1

Olympus Stylus Tough 8010

Olympus Stylus Tough 8010
similar age
$155 - $165

Significant advantages of the Tough 8010 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the Tough 8010 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Significantly heavier: 215 g vs 154 g

common strengths of the Tough 8010 and EX-G1

  • Fairly small: Compact 95x62x22 mm vs Compact 104x64x20 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.8"
  • Inexpensive: $154.99 vs $189.99
arrow Compare the Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 vs the Casio Exilim EX-G1

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-G1 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.0" vs 1.8"), takes much higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 4 MP), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO), is newer (november, 2009 vs january, 2005) and is thinner (0.8" vs 1.2").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 30 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,000 fps) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).

Casio EX-ZS12

Casio EX-ZS12
2 years newer
$204

Significant advantages of the EX-ZS12 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 38 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1250 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the EX-ZS12 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the EX-ZS12 and EX-G1

  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.8"
arrow Compare the EX-ZS12 vs the Exilim EX-G1

Ricoh Caplio R1

Ricoh Caplio R1
4 years older

Significant advantages of the R1 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 10 cm

Significant disadvantages of the R1 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much lower true resolution: 4 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.0"
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm

common strengths of the R1 and EX-G1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Ricoh Caplio R1 vs the Casio Exilim EX-G1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
10 months older
$262

Significant advantages of the DSC-W220 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 30 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W220 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the DSC-W220 and EX-G1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 vs the Casio Exilim EX-G1

Casio QV-3EX

Placeholder
9 years older

Significant advantages of the QV-3EX (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.9
  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the QV-3EX (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much lower true resolution: 3.1 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.0"
  • Much larger: Compact 115x62x33 mm vs Compact 104x64x20 mm

common strengths of the QV-3EX and EX-G1

  • None found
arrow Compare the QV-3EX vs the Exilim EX-G1

Samsung TL350

Samsung TL350
3 months newer

Significant advantages of the TL350 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 38 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.4 vs f/3.9
  • Records high-speed movies: 1,000 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the TL350 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Not waterproof
  • Heavier: 195 g vs 154 g

common strengths of the TL350 and EX-G1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Samsung TL350 vs the Casio Exilim EX-G1

Pentax Optio 330

Placeholder
8 years older

Significant advantages of the Optio 330 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the Optio 330 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much lower true resolution: 3.1 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Much smaller screen: 1.6" vs 3.0"
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 200 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

common strengths of the Optio 330 and EX-G1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Pentax Optio 330 vs the Casio Exilim EX-G1

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-G1 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it is much smaller (compact 104x64x20 mm vs standard size 114x70x77 mm), is thinner (0.8" vs 3"), is significantly lighter (154 g vs 453 g) and is waterproof.

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), doesn't have a touch screen, doesn't record movies in 24p and has a significantly smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2
1 year newer
$376 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the DMC-GF2 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Shoots RAW
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GF2 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Not waterproof
  • Significantly heavier: 310 g vs 154 g
  • Significantly thicker: 1.3" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the DMC-GF2 and EX-G1

  • Fairly small: Mid size 113x68x33 mm vs Compact 104x64x20 mm
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 0.8"
  • Inexpensive: $375.99 vs $189.99
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 vs the Casio Exilim EX-G1

Ricoh GXR (A12)

Placeholder
similar age

Significant advantages of the GXR (A12) (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Shoots RAW
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the GXR (A12) (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much larger: Standard size 114x70x77 mm vs Compact 104x64x20 mm
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 0.8"
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the GXR (A12) and EX-G1

  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Ricoh GXR (A12) vs the Casio Exilim EX-G1

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-G1 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), is much smaller (compact 104x64x20 mm vs professional size 130x100x78 mm), is slightly less expensive ($189.99 vs $618.94), is thinner (0.8" vs 3.1") and is much lighter (154 g vs 520 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 20fps), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 15.1 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$619 - $700 (body only)
$745 - $1,000 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Compact 104x64x20 mm
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.8"
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the T3i and EX-G1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3i vs the Casio Exilim EX-G1

Canon Rebel T3

Canon Rebel T3
1 year newer
$333 (body only)
$489 - $500 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.2x14.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T3 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Much larger: Professional size 130x100x78 mm vs Compact 104x64x20 mm
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the T3 and EX-G1

  • Light weight: 459 g vs 154 g
  • Inexpensive: $333.00 vs $189.99
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3 vs the Casio Exilim EX-G1

Canon Rebel T1i

Canon EOS Rebel T1i
7 months older
$475 - $629 (body only)
$549 - $580 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T1i (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 20fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the T1i (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm vs Compact 104x64x20 mm
  • Much thicker: 2.4" vs 0.8"
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the T1i and EX-G1

  • Very small: Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm vs Compact 104x64x20 mm
  • Very thin: 2.4" vs 0.8"
  • Light weight: 520 g vs 154 g
arrow Compare the Canon EOS Rebel T1i vs the Casio Exilim EX-G1

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-G1 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO), is newer (november, 2009 vs july, 2009), is thinner (0.8" vs 1") and is waterproof.

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (3x vs 8x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 25 mm), has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1
3 months older

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZR1 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZR1 (vs the EX-G1)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Not waterproof
  • Thicker: 1" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the DMC-ZR1 and EX-G1

  • Fairly small: Compact 98x55x26 mm vs Compact 104x64x20 mm
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.8"
  • Light weight: 158 g vs 154 g
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 vs the Casio Exilim EX-G1