As well as being compared against other super zooms, the Casio Exilim EX-FH25 is also often compared to pro DSLRs, waterproofs and compacts. The Casio Exilim EX-FH25's top rivals come from Casio (such as the Exilim EX-FH20 and the Exilim Pro EX-F1) and Nikon (such as the D810)

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-FH25 compared to other super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (26 mm vs 36 mm), shoots faster continuously (40 fps vs 10 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), is older (november 2009 vs july 2011), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital) and doesn't support an external flash.

Casio Exilim EX-FH20

Casio Exilim EX-FH20
1 year older
$368

Significant advantages of the EX-FH20 (vs the EX-FH25)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the EX-FH20 (vs the EX-FH25)

  • None found

common strengths of the EX-FH20 and EX-FH25

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (123×81×85 mm) vs Prosumer size (122×81×83 mm)
  • Light weight: 513 g vs 524 g
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 3.3"

Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1

Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Pro EX-F1 (vs the EX-FH25)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None
  • Shoots much faster: 60 fps vs 40 fps
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the Pro EX-F1 (vs the EX-FH25)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 26 mm
  • Thicker: 5.1" vs 3.3"

common strengths of the Pro EX-F1 and EX-FH25

  • Fairly small: Professional size (128×80×130 mm) vs Prosumer size (122×81×83 mm)
  • Very fast continuous shooting: 60 fps vs 40 fps
  • Light weight: 671 g vs 524 g

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX300 (vs the EX-FH25)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX300 (vs the EX-FH25)

  • Shoots much slower: 10 fps vs 40 fps

common strengths of the DSC-HX300 and EX-FH25

  • Fairly small: Professional size (130×93×103 mm) vs Prosumer size (122×81×83 mm)
  • Light weight: 650 g vs 524 g
  • Thin: 4.1" vs 3.3"

Olympus SP-810 UZ

Olympus SP-810 UZ
1 year newer
$489

Significant advantages of the SP-810 UZ (vs the EX-FH25)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SP-810 UZ (vs the EX-FH25)

  • Shoots much slower: 0.7 fps vs 40 fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/850 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the SP-810 UZ and EX-FH25

  • Fairly small: Standard size (106×76×74 mm) vs Prosumer size (122×81×83 mm)
  • Light weight: 413 g vs 524 g
  • Thin: 2.9" vs 3.3"

compared toPro DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-FH25 compared to pro DSLR competitors include: it records high-speed movies (1,000 fps vs none), shoots faster continuously (40 fps vs 5 fps), is much smaller (prosumer size (122×81×83 mm) vs large (146×123×82 mm)) and is significantly lighter (524 g vs 880 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a significantly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,229k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 36.2 MP) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Nikon D810

Nikon D810
4 years newer
$1,999 - $2,797 (body only)
$2,583 - $3,297 24-120mm lens

Significant advantages of the D810 (vs the EX-FH25)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 36.2 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the D810 (vs the EX-FH25)

  • Shoots much slower: 5 fps vs 40 fps
  • Much larger: Large (146×123×82 mm) vs Prosumer size (122×81×83 mm)
  • Significantly heavier: 880 g vs 524 g

common strengths of the D810 and EX-FH25

  • Built-in flashes

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-FH25 compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a built-in flash and shoots faster continuously (40 fps vs 30 fps).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (26 mm vs 5 mm), is older (november 2009 vs october 2012), is significantly heavier (524 g vs 73 g) and is not waterproof.

GoPro HERO3 Black Edition

GoPro HERO3 Black Edition
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the Black Edition (vs the EX-FH25)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Black Edition (vs the EX-FH25)

  • None found

common strengths of the Black Edition and EX-FH25

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-FH25 compared to compact competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (20x vs 3x), has a much wider wide angle lens (26 mm vs 35 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.5"), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and significantly longer exposures (30 seconds vs 4 seconds).

However, on average it is much larger (prosumer size (122×81×83 mm) vs super compact (99×57×20 mm)), is older (november 2009 vs february 2010), is thicker (3.3" vs 0.8") and is much heavier (524 g vs 124 g).

Casio Exilim EX-Z35

Casio Exilim EX-Z35
3 months newer

Significant advantages of the EX-Z35 (vs the EX-FH25)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (99×57×20 mm) vs Prosumer size (122×81×83 mm)
  • Much thinner: 0.8" vs 3.3"
  • Much lighter: 124 g vs 524 g

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z35 (vs the EX-FH25)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 26 mm
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3"

common strengths of the EX-Z35 and EX-FH25

  • Each has a built-in flash