As well as being compared against other compacts, the Casio Exilim EX-TR50 is also often compared to ultra compacts, travel zooms, mirrorless and digicams. The Casio Exilim EX-TR50's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-FX65 and the Lumix DMC-GF8) and Casio (such as the EX-TR150 and the Exilim EX-TR15)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-TR50 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a touch screen, has a screen which flips out, is newer (september 2014 vs july 2013) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/16000 of a second vs 1 seconds).

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in flash.

Casio EX-TR150

Casio EX-TR150
3 years older

Significant advantages of the EX-TR150 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the EX-TR150 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 921k dots

common strengths of the EX-TR150 and EX-TR50

  • Fairly small: Super compact (123×59×15 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • Flip-out screens

Casio Exilim EX-TR15

Casio Exilim EX-TR15
1 year older
$1,093

Significant advantages of the EX-TR15 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Built-in flash

Significant disadvantages of the EX-TR15 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1 seconds vs 1/16000 of a second
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the EX-TR15 and EX-TR50

  • Fairly small: Super compact (129×62×15 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • Very thin: 0.6" vs 0.6"

Fujifilm FinePix XP120

Fujifilm FinePix XP120
2 years newer
$139 - $180

Significant advantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Built-in flash

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.9 vs f/2.8
  • Much larger: Compact (110×71×28 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the FinePix XP120 and EX-TR50

  • None found

Casio Exilim EX-TR10

Casio Exilim EX-TR10
1 year older
$826

Significant advantages of the EX-TR10 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Built-in flash

Significant disadvantages of the EX-TR10 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1 seconds vs 1/16000 of a second
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the EX-TR10 and EX-TR50

  • Fairly small: Super compact (129×62×15 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • Very thin: 0.6" vs 0.6"

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-TR50 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a significantly higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 230k dots), has a touch screen, has a screen which flips out and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in flash and much shorter exposures (1 seconds vs 60 seconds).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX65

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX65
5 years older

Significant advantages of the DMC-FX65 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FX65 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-FX65 and EX-TR50

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-TR50 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 460k dots), is significantly smaller (super compact (126×64×15 mm) vs compact (108×60×31 mm)), takes slightly higher resolution photos (12 MP vs 5 MP), has a touch screen and has a screen which flips out.

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in flash, has a much shorter battery life (240 shots vs 515 shots) and is slightly more expensive ($769.49 vs $297.19).

Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000

Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000
2 years older
$297

Significant advantages of the EX-ZR1000 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Built-in flash
  • Much longer battery life: 470 shots vs 240 shots

Significant disadvantages of the EX-ZR1000 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Much larger: Compact (108×62×37 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 921k dots
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the EX-ZR1000 and EX-TR50

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Flip-out screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Casio Exilim ZR-200

Casio Exilim EX-ZR200
2 years older
$788

Significant advantages of the ZR-200 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Built-in flash
  • Much longer battery life: 480 shots vs 240 shots
  • Longer exposures: 15 seconds vs 1 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the ZR-200 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 921k dots
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (105×59×29 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)

common strengths of the ZR-200 and EX-TR50

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×29 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Casio Exilim ZR800

Casio Exilim ZR800
1 year older
$286

Significant advantages of the ZR800 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Built-in flash
  • Much longer battery life: 470 shots vs 240 shots

Significant disadvantages of the ZR800 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Significantly larger: Compact (108×60×31 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)
  • No touch screen
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the ZR800 and EX-TR50

  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 921k dots
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Casio Exilim ZR400

Casio Exilim ZR400
1 year older
$268

Significant advantages of the ZR400 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Built-in flash
  • Much longer battery life: 515 shots vs 240 shots

Significant disadvantages of the ZR400 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 921k dots
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (105×59×29 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)

common strengths of the ZR400 and EX-TR50

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×29 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-TR50 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has a touch screen, is slightly smaller (super compact (126×64×15 mm) vs mid size (117×67×40 mm)), is thinner (0.6" vs 1.6"), is slightly lighter (167 g vs 350 g) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/16000 of a second vs 1/500 of a second).

However, on average it takes slightly lower resolution photos (12 MP vs 16 MP), significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO), has a slightly smaller sensor (1/1.8" 7.44x5.58mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.6mm), has a slightly shorter battery life (240 shots vs 410 shots) and is older (september 2014 vs february 2016).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-GF8 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 1 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-GF8 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/500 of a second vs 1/16000 of a second
  • Thicker: 1.3" vs 0.6"

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-GF8 and EX-TR50

  • Have touch screens
  • Fairly small: Compact (107×65×33 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)
  • Light weight: 266 g vs 167 g

Fujifilm X-A2

Fujifilm X-A2
3 months newer
$578 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-A2 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Much longer battery life: 410 shots vs 240 shots
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the X-A2 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly thicker: 1.6" vs 0.6"
  • Significantly heavier: 350 g vs 167 g

common strengths of the X-A2 and EX-TR50

  • Fairly small: Mid size (117×67×40 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)
  • Light weight: 350 g vs 167 g
  • Thin: 1.6" vs 0.6"

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-TR50 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.3), has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a much higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 230k dots), takes slightly higher resolution photos (12 MP vs 5.7 MP) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in flash, is older (september 2014 vs august 2016), is significantly more expensive ($769.49 vs $109.00) and is less popular.

Nikon Coolpix W100

Nikon Coolpix W100
1 year newer
$109 - $157

Significant advantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Built-in flash

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Coolpix W100 and EX-TR50

  • Fairly small: Mid size (110×67×38 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)
  • Light weight: 177 g vs 167 g
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 0.6"