As well as being compared against other compacts, the Casio Exilim EX-TR50 is also often compared to mirrorless, travel zooms, digicams and waterproofs. The Casio Exilim EX-TR50's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix W100) and Casio (such as the Exilim ZR400 and the Exilim ZR800)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-TR50 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.9), is slightly smaller (super compact (126×64×15 mm) vs compact (110×71×28 mm)), takes slightly higher resolution photos (12 MP vs 9.7 MP), has a touch screen and has a screen which flips out.

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in flash.

Fujifilm FinePix XP120

Fujifilm FinePix XP120
2 years newer
$149 - $176

Significant advantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Built-in flash

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.9 vs f/2.8
  • Much larger: Compact (110×71×28 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the FinePix XP120 and EX-TR50

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • High resolution screens: 920k dots vs 921k dots
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Casio EX-TR150

Casio EX-TR150
3 years older

Significant advantages of the EX-TR150 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the EX-TR150 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 921k dots

common strengths of the EX-TR150 and EX-TR50

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Fairly small: Super compact (123×59×15 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"

Casio Exilim EX-TR10

Casio Exilim EX-TR10
1 year older
$1,152

Significant advantages of the EX-TR10 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Built-in flash

Significant disadvantages of the EX-TR10 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1 seconds vs 1/16000 of a second
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the EX-TR10 and EX-TR50

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Fairly small: Super compact (129×62×15 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-TR50 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 460k dots), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.6" vs 1.4"), is slightly lighter (167 g vs 266 g) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/16000 of a second vs 1/500 of a second).

However, on average it takes significantly lower resolution photos (12 MP vs 19.8 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO), has a significantly smaller sensor (1/1.8" 7.44x5.58mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.6mm), has a much shorter battery life (240 shots vs 650 shots) and has a built-in lens.

Samsung NX Mini

Samsung NX Mini
6 months older
$219 (body only)
$389 9-27mm lens

Significant advantages of the Mini (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Much longer battery life: 650 shots vs 240 shots
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Much higher true resolution: 20.5 MP vs 12 MP

Significant disadvantages of the Mini (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 921k dots

common strengths of the Mini and EX-TR50

  • Have touch screens
  • Flip-out screens
  • Fairly small: Compact (110×62×23 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-GF8 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 1 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-GF8 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/500 of a second vs 1/16000 of a second

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-GF8 and EX-TR50

  • Have touch screens
  • Flip-out screens
  • Fairly small: Compact (107×65×33 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)

Fujifilm X-A2

Fujifilm X-A2
3 months newer
$360 - $606 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-A2 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Much longer battery life: 410 shots vs 240 shots
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the X-A2 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly heavier: 350 g vs 167 g
  • Significantly thicker: 1.6" vs 0.6"

common strengths of the X-A2 and EX-TR50

  • Flip-out screens
  • Fairly small: Mid size (117×67×40 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)
  • Light weight: 350 g vs 167 g

Sony Alpha A5100

Sony Alpha A5100
similar age
$398 (body only)
$448 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the A5100 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Much higher true resolution: 24.7 MP vs 12 MP
  • Much longer battery life: 400 shots vs 240 shots
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the A5100 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Thicker: 1.4" vs 0.6"

common strengths of the A5100 and EX-TR50

  • Have touch screens
  • Flip-out screens
  • Fairly small: Compact (110×63×36 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)

Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000
8 months older
$300 (body only)
$367 - $379 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the A5000 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Much longer battery life: 420 shots vs 240 shots
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Significantly higher true resolution: 19.8 MP vs 12 MP

Significant disadvantages of the A5000 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 921k dots
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 1.4" vs 0.6"

common strengths of the A5000 and EX-TR50

  • Flip-out screens
  • Fairly small: Compact (110×63×36 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)
  • Very light: 210 g vs 167 g

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-TR50 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.5), has a slightly higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 460k dots), is significantly smaller (super compact (126×64×15 mm) vs compact (108×60×31 mm)), takes slightly higher resolution photos (12 MP vs 5 MP) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in flash, has a much shorter battery life (240 shots vs 515 shots) and is significantly more expensive ($655.28 vs $239.99).

Casio Exilim ZR400

Casio Exilim ZR400
1 year older
$240

Significant advantages of the ZR400 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Built-in flash
  • Much longer battery life: 515 shots vs 240 shots

Significant disadvantages of the ZR400 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (105×59×29 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 921k dots

common strengths of the ZR400 and EX-TR50

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×29 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Casio Exilim ZR800

Casio Exilim ZR800
1 year older
$465

Significant advantages of the ZR800 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Built-in flash
  • Much longer battery life: 470 shots vs 240 shots

Significant disadvantages of the ZR800 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • No touch screen
  • Narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.8
  • Significantly larger: Compact (108×60×31 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)

common strengths of the ZR800 and EX-TR50

  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 921k dots
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-TR50 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.3), has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a much higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 230k dots), takes slightly higher resolution photos (12 MP vs 5.7 MP) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in flash, is older (september 2014 vs august 2016) and is significantly more expensive ($655.28 vs $156.95).

Nikon Coolpix W100

Nikon Coolpix W100
1 year newer
$157

Significant advantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Built-in flash

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Coolpix W100 and EX-TR50

  • Fairly small: Mid size (110×67×38 mm) vs Super compact (126×64×15 mm)
  • Light weight: 177 g vs 167 g
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 0.6"

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Casio EX-TR50 compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3" vs 1.5"), has a much higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 115k dots), has a touch screen, has a screen which flips out and is thinner (0.6" vs 3.5").

However, on average it has a significantly shorter battery life (240 shots vs 350 shots), is significantly more expensive ($655.28 vs $162.57) and is not waterproof.

Ricoh WG-M1

Ricoh WG-M1
similar age
$163

Significant advantages of the WG-M1 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WG-M1 (vs the EX-TR50)

  • None found

common strengths of the WG-M1 and EX-TR50

  • None found