Canon PowerShot TX1

Canon PowerShot TX1
Competitors
Travel zoom Travel zoom
February, 2007

As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Canon PowerShot TX1 is also often compared to entry-level DSLRs, pro DSLRs, ultra compacts, pro digicams, mirrorless, compacts and super zooms. The Canon PowerShot TX1's top rivals come from Canon (such as the Rebel T3i and the EOS 60D) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S230 and the D3000)

Competitor classes

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon TX1 compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (compact 89x60x29 mm vs compact 106x59x33 mm), is thinner (1.1" vs 1.3") and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2500 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (10x vs 14x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (39 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps) and has a much smaller screen (1.8" vs 3.0").

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX5v (vs the TX1)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 39 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX5v (vs the TX1)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-HX5v and TX1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
4 years newer
$239 - $307

Significant advantages of the SX230 HS (vs the TX1)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 39 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the SX230 HS (vs the TX1)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 106x59x33 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm

common strengths of the SX230 HS and TX1

  • Fast max shutter speeds: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second
arrow Compare the SX230 HS vs the TX1

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v
3 years newer
$319 - $330

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the TX1)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 39 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the TX1)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x59x34 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-HX9v and TX1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon TX1 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has better image stabilization (lens vs none), is much smaller (compact 89x60x29 mm vs prosumer size 124x96x73 mm), is thinner (1.1" vs 2.9") and is much lighter (260 g vs 520 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 20fps), has a much smaller screen (1.8" vs 3.0"), has a significantly lower resolution screen (115k dots vs 920k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (7.1 MP vs 16 MP) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
4 years newer
$619 (body only)
$749 - $1,000 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the TX1)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the T3i and TX1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Rebel T3i vs the PowerShot TX1

Nikon D3000

Nikon D3000
2 years newer
$487 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3000 (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the D3000 (vs the TX1)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Does not take movies: None vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 126x97x64 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm

common strengths of the D3000 and TX1

  • Very small: Prosumer size 126x97x64 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Very thin: 2.5" vs 1.1"
arrow Compare the Nikon D3000 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

Nikon D3100

Nikon D3100
3 years newer
$500 - $547 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3100 (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.1x15.4mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the D3100 (vs the TX1)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Much thicker: 2.9" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the D3100 and TX1

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Thin: 2.9" vs 1.1"
  • Light weight: 505 g vs 260 g
arrow Compare the Nikon D3100 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

Sony SLT A35

Sony SLT A35
4 years newer
$598 (body only)
$629 18-70mm lens

Significant advantages of the SLT A35 (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.4x15.6mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 115k dots

Significant disadvantages of the SLT A35 (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size 124x92x85 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Much thicker: 3.3" vs 1.1"
  • Significantly heavier: 415 g vs 260 g

common strengths of the SLT A35 and TX1

  • Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
  • Very light: 415 g vs 260 g
arrow Compare the Sony SLT A35 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

Canon Rebel T2i

Canon EOS Rebel T2i
3 years newer
$528 - $949 (body only)
$649 - $867 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T2i (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T2i (vs the TX1)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Much thicker: 2.4" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the T2i and TX1

  • Very small: Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Very thin: 2.4" vs 1.1"
arrow Compare the Rebel T2i vs the PowerShot TX1

Canon Rebel T1i

Canon EOS Rebel T1i
2 years newer
$475 - $629 (body only)
$549 - $570 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T1i (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T1i (vs the TX1)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Much thicker: 2.4" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the T1i and TX1

  • Very small: Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Very thin: 2.4" vs 1.1"
  • Light weight: 520 g vs 260 g
arrow Compare the Rebel T1i vs the PowerShot TX1

compared toPro DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon TX1 compared to pro DSLR competitors include: it has image stabilization (lens vs none), is much smaller (compact 89x60x29 mm vs professional size 145x106x79 mm), is thinner (1.1" vs 3.1") and is significantly lighter (260 g vs 755 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (1.8" vs 3.0"), has a much lower resolution screen (115k dots vs 1,040k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (7.1 MP vs 17.9 MP) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon EOS 60D

Canon EOS 60D
3 years newer
$848 - $1,304 (body only)
$1,177 - $1,342 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the 60D (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 115k dots

Significant disadvantages of the 60D (vs the TX1)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.1"
  • Much larger: Professional size 145x106x79 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm

common strengths of the 60D and TX1

  • Fairly small: Professional size 145x106x79 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 1.1"
  • Light weight: 755 g vs 260 g
arrow Compare the EOS 60D vs the PowerShot TX1

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon TX1 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (10x vs 4.3x) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2500 of a second vs 1/1250 of a second).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (39 mm vs 26 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.8" vs 3.3"), has a significantly lower resolution screen (115k dots vs 921k dots) and is significantly larger (compact 89x60x29 mm vs ultra compact 93x55x16 mm).

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55
4 years newer
$279 - $350

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX55 (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.3" vs 1.8"
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 39 mm
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 115k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX55 (vs the TX1)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-TX55 and TX1

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

Sony Cybershot TX10

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX10
4 years newer
$345

Significant advantages of the TX10 (vs the TX1)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 39 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 7.1 MP

Significant disadvantages of the TX10 (vs the TX1)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second

common strengths of the TX10 and TX1

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-TX10 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1
2 years newer
$293

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Significantly better wide angle: 35 mm vs 39 mm
  • Significantly smaller: Ultra compact 94x58x17 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the TX1)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1250 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-TX1 and TX1

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

Sony Cybershot T110

Sony Cybershot DSC-T110
4 years newer
$309

Significant advantages of the T110 (vs the TX1)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 39 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 7.1 MP

Significant disadvantages of the T110 (vs the TX1)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second

common strengths of the T110 and TX1

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-T110 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5
3 years newer
$248 - $332

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX5 (vs the TX1)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 39 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.9 MP vs 7.1 MP

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX5 (vs the TX1)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-TX5 and TX1

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, compared to pro digicam competitors the Canon TX1 has a much smaller sensor (1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.0), has a much narrower wide angle lens (39 mm vs 24 mm) and has a much smaller screen (1.8" vs 3.0").

Canon PowerShot S95

Canon PowerShot S95
3 years newer
$354 - $389

Significant advantages of the S95 (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.5

Significant disadvantages of the S95 (vs the TX1)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second

common strengths of the S95 and TX1

  • Fairly small: Compact 99x58x29 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Thin: 1.2" vs 1.1"
arrow Compare the S95 vs the TX1

Canon PowerShot G11

Canon PowerShot G11
2 years newer
$672

Significant advantages of the G11 (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 39 mm

Significant disadvantages of the G11 (vs the TX1)

  • None found

common strengths of the G11 and TX1

  • None found
arrow Compare the G11 vs the TX1

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
4 years newer
$356 - $430

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 39 mm
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the TX1)

  • None found

common strengths of the S100 and TX1

  • Fairly small: Compact 99x60x28 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"
arrow Compare the Powershot S100 vs the PowerShot TX1

Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12
3 years newer
$398 - $496

Significant advantages of the G12 (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 39 mm

Significant disadvantages of the G12 (vs the TX1)

  • Heavier: 401 g vs 260 g

common strengths of the G12 and TX1

  • None found
arrow Compare the G12 vs the TX1

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon TX1 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has better image stabilization (lens vs none), is slightly smaller (compact 89x60x29 mm vs mid size 115x72x42 mm), is thinner (1.1" vs 1.5"), is significantly lighter (260 g vs 585 g) and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (1.8" vs 3.0"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (115k dots vs 460k dots), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs rangefinder), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,200 fps) and takes significantly lower resolution photos (7.1 MP vs 18.1 MP).

Leica M9

Leica M9
2 years newer
$6,721 (body only)

Significant advantages of the M9 (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger screen: 2.5" vs 1.8"
  • Much larger sensor: Full frame 36.0x24.0mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Rangefinder vs None

Significant disadvantages of the M9 (vs the TX1)

  • Does not take movies: None vs 720p @ 30fps
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Significantly larger: Mid size 139x80x37 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm

common strengths of the M9 and TX1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Leica M9 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

Olympus PEN E-PL2

Olympus PEN E-PL2
3 years newer
$485 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the PEN E-PL2 (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 460k dots vs 115k dots
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the PEN E-PL2 (vs the TX1)

  • Significantly larger: Mid size 115x72x42 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.7" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the PEN E-PL2 and TX1

  • Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Olympus PEN E-PL2 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

Nikon 1 J1

Nikon 1 J1
4 years newer
$547 10-30mm lens

Significant advantages of the J1 (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Records high-speed movies: 1,200 fps vs None
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the J1 (vs the TX1)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the J1 and TX1

  • Fairly small: Compact 106x61x29 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Thin: 1.2" vs 1.1"
  • Light weight: 277 g vs 260 g
arrow Compare the Nikon 1 J1 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon TX1 compared to compact competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (10x vs 4x), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2500 of a second vs 1/1400 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/3.0), has a much narrower wide angle lens (39 mm vs 25 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.8" vs 3.5"), has a significantly lower resolution screen (115k dots vs 921k dots) and is slightly larger (compact 89x60x29 mm vs super compact 96x59x19 mm).

Nikon Coolpix S230

Nikon Coolpix S230
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the S230 (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 7.1 MP
  • Significantly better wide angle: 35 mm vs 39 mm

Significant disadvantages of the S230 (vs the TX1)

  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens

common strengths of the S230 and TX1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S230 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9
2 years newer
$268

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX9 (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.5" vs 1.8"
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 39 mm
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 7.1 MP

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX9 (vs the TX1)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-TX9 and TX1

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99
3 years newer
$193

Significant advantages of the DSC-T99 (vs the TX1)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 39 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T99 (vs the TX1)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-T99 and TX1

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

Sony Cybershot DSC-W650

Sony Cybershot DSC-W650
4 years newer
$119 - $138

Significant advantages of the DSC-W650 (vs the TX1)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 39 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.5

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W650 (vs the TX1)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-W650 and TX1

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-W650 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

Kodak EasyShare M341

Kodak EasyShare M341
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the M341 (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 7.1 MP
  • Significantly better wide angle: 35 mm vs 39 mm

Significant disadvantages of the M341 (vs the TX1)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1400 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second

common strengths of the M341 and TX1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Kodak EasyShare M341 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

Sony Cybershot WX9

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9
4 years newer

Significant advantages of the WX9 (vs the TX1)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 39 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.5

Significant disadvantages of the WX9 (vs the TX1)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second

common strengths of the WX9 and TX1

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon TX1 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is much smaller (compact 89x60x29 mm vs large 131x97x126 mm), is thinner (1.1" vs 3.9") and is significantly lighter (260 g vs 544 g).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.8), has much less zoom (10x vs 26.1x), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (39 mm vs 25 mm) and has a much smaller screen (1.8" vs 3.0").

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR
4 years newer
$438 - $500

Significant advantages of the HS30 EXR (vs the TX1)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 39 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 10x

Significant disadvantages of the HS30 EXR (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger: Large 131x97x126 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Much thicker: 5" vs 1.1"
  • Much heavier: 687 g vs 260 g

common strengths of the HS30 EXR and TX1

  • Fast max shutter speeds: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

Nikon Coolpix P100

Nikon Coolpix P100
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the P100 (vs the TX1)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 39 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Much more zoom: 26.1x vs 10x

Significant disadvantages of the P100 (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size 114x83x99 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Much thicker: 3.9" vs 1.1"
  • Significantly heavier: 481 g vs 260 g

common strengths of the P100 and TX1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P100 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1
2 years newer
$355

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX1 (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 39 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX1 (vs the TX1)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size 115x83x92 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Much thicker: 3.6" vs 1.1"
  • Much heavier: 544 g vs 260 g

common strengths of the DSC-HX1 and TX1

  • Fast max shutter speeds: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1

Nikon Coolpix L120

Nikon Coolpix L120
4 years newer
$180 - $229

Significant advantages of the L120 (vs the TX1)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 39 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 1.8"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 115k dots

Significant disadvantages of the L120 (vs the TX1)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 110x77x78 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.1"
  • Heavier: 406 g vs 260 g

common strengths of the L120 and TX1

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x77x78 mm vs Compact 89x60x29 mm
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 1.1"
  • Light weight: 406 g vs 260 g
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L120 vs the Canon PowerShot TX1