Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX20 IS compared to compact competitors include: it has way more more zoom (20x vs 4x), has a screen which flips out, slightly closer macro focusing (0 cm vs 3 cm), has a viewfinder (digital vs none) and supports an external flash.
However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a significantly smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0"), is much larger (prosumer size 128x88x87 mm vs super compact 92x55x19 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).
Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$148 - $179
|
Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the SX20 IS)
- Much smaller: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Prosumer size 128x88x87 mm
- Much lighter: 141 g vs 600 g
- Much thinner: 0.8" vs 3.4"
Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the SX20 IS)
- Much less zoom: 5x vs 20x
- Screen does not flip out
- No external flash support
common strengths of the 300 HS and SX20 IS
- Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.8
- Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
- Good macro capabilities: 3 cm vs 0 cm
|
|
|
|
Canon ELPH 100 HS
1 year newer
$103 - $189
|
Significant advantages of the 100 HS (vs the SX20 IS)
- Much smaller: Super compact 93x55x19 mm vs Prosumer size 128x88x87 mm
- Much lighter: 140 g vs 600 g
- Much thinner: 0.8" vs 3.4"
Significant disadvantages of the 100 HS (vs the SX20 IS)
- Much less zoom: 4x vs 20x
- Screen does not flip out
- No external flash support
common strengths of the 100 HS and SX20 IS
- Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
- Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
- Good macro capabilities: 3 cm vs 0 cm
|
|
|
|