overview

As well as being compared against other super zooms, the Canon PowerShot SX20 IS is also often compared to pro digicams and travel zooms. The Canon PowerShot SX20 IS's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix P100 and the Coolpix L110) and Canon (such as the PowerShot G11 and the PowerShot SX1 IS)

compared toRecent super zooms

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX20 IS compared to other competitive super zooms include: it has better image stabilization (lens vs none), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 8.1 MP) and supports an external flash.

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (20x vs 26.1x), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p), has a significantly smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0"), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (0.7 fps vs 10 fps) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Nikon Coolpix P100

Nikon Coolpix P100
5 months newer
$339 - $400

Significant advantages of the P100 (vs the SX20 IS)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Significantly more zoom: 26.1x vs 20x
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the P100 (vs the SX20 IS)

  • No external flash support

common strengths of the P100 and SX20 IS

  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 0 cm
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Fast max shutter speeds: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/3200 of a second
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P100 vs the Canon PowerShot SX20 IS

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35
similar age
$315 - $414

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ35 (vs the SX20 IS)

  • Shoots RAW
  • Has boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs None
  • Significantly lighter: 397 g vs 600 g

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ35 (vs the SX20 IS)

  • No external flash support

common strengths of the DMC-FZ35 and SX20 IS

  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 0 cm
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Fast max shutter speeds: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/3200 of a second
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 vs the Canon PowerShot SX20 IS

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1
5 months older
$350 - $380

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX1 (vs the SX20 IS)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
  • Higher resolution movies: 1440 x 1080 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX1 (vs the SX20 IS)

  • Significantly smaller sensor: 1/3.6" 5x4mm vs 1/2.5" 6x4mm
  • Much lower resolution: 8.1 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • No external flash support

common strengths of the DSC-HX1 and SX20 IS

  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 0 cm
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Fast max shutter speeds: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/3200 of a second
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 vs the Canon PowerShot SX20 IS

Canon PowerShot SX1 IS

Canon PowerShot SX1 IS
1 year older
$600

Significant advantages of the SX1 IS (vs the SX20 IS)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly larger screen: 2.8" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the SX1 IS (vs the SX20 IS)

  • None found

common strengths of the SX1 IS and SX20 IS

  • Good macro capabilities: 0 cm vs 0 cm
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Support external flash
arrow Compare the SX1 IS vs the SX20 IS

Fujifilm FinePix HS10

Fujifilm FinePix HS10
5 months newer
$410 - $430

Significant advantages of the HS10 (vs the SX20 IS)

  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 20x
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the HS10 (vs the SX20 IS)

  • Significantly larger: Large 131x91x126 mm vs Prosumer size 128x88x87 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 5" vs 3.4"

common strengths of the HS10 and SX20 IS

  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 0 cm
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Support external flash
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix HS10 vs the Canon PowerShot SX20 IS

Olympus SP-800 UZ

Olympus SP-800 UZ
5 months newer
$257 - $350

Significant advantages of the SP-800 UZ (vs the SX20 IS)

  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 20x
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
  • Shoots significantly faster: 10 fps vs 0.7 fps

Significant disadvantages of the SP-800 UZ (vs the SX20 IS)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • No external flash support

common strengths of the SP-800 UZ and SX20 IS

  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 0 cm
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Fast max shutter speeds: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/3200 of a second
arrow Compare the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs the Canon PowerShot SX20 IS

compared toRecent pro digicams

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX20 IS compared to competitive pro digicams include: it has way more more zoom (20x vs 5x), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps) and is slightly less expensive ($369.00 vs $446.95).

However, on average it doesn't shoot RAW, has a much smaller sensor (1/2.5" 6x4mm vs 1/1.7" 7x5mm), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 461k dots), has a significantly smaller screen (2.5" vs 2.8") and is much larger (prosumer size 128x88x87 mm vs mid size 112x76x48 mm).

Canon PowerShot G11

Canon PowerShot G11
similar age
$447 - $520

Significant advantages of the G11 (vs the SX20 IS)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7x5mm vs 1/2.5" 6x4mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much smaller: Mid size 112x76x48 mm vs Prosumer size 128x88x87 mm

Significant disadvantages of the G11 (vs the SX20 IS)

  • Much less zoom: 5x vs 20x
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps

common strengths of the G11 and SX20 IS

  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 0 cm
  • Each supports an external flash
  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Digital
arrow Compare the G11 vs the SX20 IS

compared toRecent travel zooms

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX20 IS compared to competitive travel zooms include: it has a slightly wider wide-angle lens (28 mm vs 36 mm), has significantly more zoom (20x vs 10x), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps), has a marginally larger sensor (1/2.5" 6x4mm vs 1/2.5" 5x4mm) and slightly closer macro focusing (0 cm vs 5 cm).

However, on average it is much larger (prosumer size 128x88x87 mm vs compact 103x61x38 mm), has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0"), is much heavier (600 g vs 220 g), is older (august, 2009 vs february, 2010) and is thicker (3.4" vs 1.5").

Canon PowerShot SX210 IS

Canon PowerShot SX210 IS
5 months newer
$329 - $350

Significant advantages of the SX210 IS (vs the SX20 IS)

  • Much smaller: Compact 103x61x38 mm vs Prosumer size 128x88x87 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
  • Much lighter: 220 g vs 600 g

Significant disadvantages of the SX210 IS (vs the SX20 IS)

  • Significantly less zoom: 14x vs 20x
  • Significantly worse macro capability: 5 cm vs 0 cm
  • No external flash support

common strengths of the SX210 IS and SX20 IS

  • Popularity: 2,633,636 vs 2,236,808
arrow Compare the SX210 IS vs the SX20 IS

Canon PowerShot SX120 IS

Canon PowerShot SX120 IS
similar age
$157 - $242

Significant advantages of the SX120 IS (vs the SX20 IS)

  • Much smaller: Mid size 111x71x45 mm vs Prosumer size 128x88x87 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
  • Much lighter: 285 g vs 600 g

Significant disadvantages of the SX120 IS (vs the SX20 IS)

  • Significantly worse wide-angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly less zoom: 10x vs 20x
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps

common strengths of the SX120 IS and SX20 IS

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 0 cm
arrow Compare the SX120 IS vs the SX20 IS