As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Canon PowerShot SX120 IS is also often compared to super zooms, pro digicams, entry-level DSLRs, ultra compacts and compacts. The Canon PowerShot SX120 IS's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SX130 IS and the PowerShot SX150 IS) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix L120 and the Coolpix L110)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX120 IS compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.3).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (36 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps) and takes significantly lower resolution photos (8.6 MP vs 9.8 MP).

Canon PowerShot SX130 IS

Canon PowerShot SX130 IS
1 year newer
$127 - $245

Significant advantages of the SX130 IS (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 36 mm
  • Significantly higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8.6 MP

Significant disadvantages of the SX130 IS (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/2.8

common strengths of the SX130 IS and SX120 IS

  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 1 cm
arrow Compare the SX130 IS vs the SX120 IS

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS
2 years newer
$169 - $199

Significant advantages of the SX150 IS (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 36 mm
  • Significantly higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8.6 MP

Significant disadvantages of the SX150 IS (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/2.8

common strengths of the SX150 IS and SX120 IS

  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 1 cm
arrow Compare the SX150 IS vs the SX120 IS

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS
1 year newer
$305 - $379

Significant advantages of the SX220 HS (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 36 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the SX220 HS (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Significantly worse macro capability: 5 cm vs 1 cm

common strengths of the SX220 HS and SX120 IS

  • None found
arrow Compare the SX220 HS vs the SX120 IS

Canon PowerShot SX110 IS

Canon PowerShot SX110 IS
1 year older

Significant advantages of the SX110 IS (vs the SX120 IS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SX110 IS (vs the SX120 IS)

  • None found

common strengths of the SX110 IS and SX120 IS

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 1 cm
arrow Compare the SX110 IS vs the SX120 IS

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
2 years newer
$195 - $199

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 36 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the SX120 IS)

  • None found

common strengths of the 310 HS and SX120 IS

  • Wide aperture: f/3.0 vs f/2.8
  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 1 cm
arrow Compare the ELPH 310 HS vs the PowerShot SX120 IS

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
1 year newer
$195 - $328

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 36 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.8

common strengths of the DMC-ZS10 and SX120 IS

  • None found
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs the Canon PowerShot SX120 IS

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX120 IS compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.5), is slightly smaller (mid size 111x71x45 mm vs prosumer size 120x79x91 mm), is thinner (1.8" vs 3.2"), is slightly lighter (285 g vs 437 g) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (10x vs 21x), records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (36 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots) and takes significantly lower resolution photos (8.6 MP vs 9.8 MP).

Nikon Coolpix L120

Nikon Coolpix L120
1 year newer
$227 - $230

Significant advantages of the L120 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 36 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 21x vs 10x
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the L120 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Larger: Prosumer size 110x77x78 mm vs Mid size 111x71x45 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 3.1" vs 1.8"

common strengths of the L120 and SX120 IS

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x77x78 mm vs Mid size 111x71x45 mm
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 1.8"
  • Light weight: 406 g vs 285 g
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L120 vs the Canon PowerShot SX120 IS

Nikon Coolpix L110

Nikon Coolpix L110
5 months newer
$253 - $272

Significant advantages of the L110 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 36 mm
  • Significantly higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8.6 MP
  • Has boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs None

Significant disadvantages of the L110 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.8
  • Significantly thicker: 3.1" vs 1.8"

common strengths of the L110 and SX120 IS

  • Fairly small: Standard size 109x74x78 mm vs Mid size 111x71x45 mm
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 1.8"
  • Light weight: 406 g vs 285 g
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L110 vs the Canon PowerShot SX120 IS

Fujifilm FinePix S2950

Fujifilm FinePix S2950
1 year newer
$139 - $200

Significant advantages of the S2950 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 36 mm
  • Significantly higher true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 8.6 MP
  • Has boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S2950 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Larger: Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs Mid size 111x71x45 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 3.2" vs 1.8"
  • Heavier: 437 g vs 285 g

common strengths of the S2950 and SX120 IS

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs Mid size 111x71x45 mm
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 1.8"
  • Light weight: 437 g vs 285 g
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix S2950 vs the Canon PowerShot SX120 IS

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ48

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ48
1 year newer
$418 - $492

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ48 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 36 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Significantly more zoom: 24x vs 10x

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ48 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 120x79x91 mm vs Mid size 111x71x45 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 3.6" vs 1.8"
  • Significantly heavier: 498 g vs 285 g

common strengths of the DMC-FZ48 and SX120 IS

  • None found
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ48 vs the Canon PowerShot SX120 IS

Fujifilm FinePix S1800

Fujifilm FinePix S1800
5 months newer

Significant advantages of the S1800 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 36 mm
  • Significantly higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8.6 MP
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S1800 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Significantly thicker: 3.2" vs 1.8"

common strengths of the S1800 and SX120 IS

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs Mid size 111x71x45 mm
  • Very light: 337 g vs 285 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 1.8"
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix S1800 vs the Canon PowerShot SX120 IS

Nikon Coolpix L100

Nikon Coolpix L100
6 months older
$338

Significant advantages of the L100 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 36 mm
  • Significantly higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8.6 MP

Significant disadvantages of the L100 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.8
  • Significantly thicker: 3.1" vs 1.8"

common strengths of the L100 and SX120 IS

  • Fairly small: Standard size 110x72x78 mm vs Mid size 111x71x45 mm
  • Light weight: 360 g vs 285 g
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 1.8"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L100 vs the Canon PowerShot SX120 IS

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX120 IS compared to pro digicam competitors include: it slightly closer macro focusing (1 cm vs 3 cm), is slightly less expensive ($225.24 vs $535.65) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a significantly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/2.0), records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps) and has a much narrower wide angle lens (36 mm vs 24 mm).

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
2 years newer
$414 - $430

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 36 mm

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • None found

common strengths of the S100 and SX120 IS

  • Inexpensive: $414.00 vs $225.24
arrow Compare the Powershot S100 vs the PowerShot SX120 IS

Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12
1 year newer
$389 - $500

Significant advantages of the G12 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 36 mm

Significant disadvantages of the G12 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.0"

common strengths of the G12 and SX120 IS

  • Inexpensive: $389.00 vs $225.24
arrow Compare the G12 vs the SX120 IS

Canon PowerShot S95

Canon PowerShot S95
1 year newer
$369

Significant advantages of the S95 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 36 mm

Significant disadvantages of the S95 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Significantly worse macro capability: 5 cm vs 1 cm
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second

common strengths of the S95 and SX120 IS

  • Inexpensive: $369.00 vs $225.24
arrow Compare the S95 vs the SX120 IS

Canon PowerShot S90

Canon PowerShot S90
similar age
$536

Significant advantages of the S90 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 36 mm

Significant disadvantages of the S90 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second

common strengths of the S90 and SX120 IS

  • None found
arrow Compare the S90 vs the SX120 IS

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX120 IS compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), has image stabilization (lens vs none), is much smaller (mid size 111x71x45 mm vs professional size 130x100x78 mm), is thinner (1.8" vs 3.1") and is much lighter (285 g vs 570 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,040k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (8.6 MP vs 17.9 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon Rebel T3

Canon Rebel T3
1 year newer
$379 (body only)
$460 - $550 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.2x14.7mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T3 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much larger: Professional size 130x100x78 mm vs Mid size 111x71x45 mm

common strengths of the T3 and SX120 IS

  • Light weight: 459 g vs 285 g
arrow Compare the Rebel T3 vs the PowerShot SX120 IS

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
1 year newer
$609 - $800 (body only)
$709 - $1,180 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the SX120 IS)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Mid size 111x71x45 mm
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.8"

common strengths of the T3i and SX120 IS

  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
arrow Compare the Rebel T3i vs the PowerShot SX120 IS

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS
1 year older
$334 - $595 (body only)
$449 - $460 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the Rebel XS (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.2x14.8mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the Rebel XS (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.0"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 126x98x65 mm vs Mid size 111x71x45 mm

common strengths of the Rebel XS and SX120 IS

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 126x98x65 mm vs Mid size 111x71x45 mm
  • Very thin: 2.6" vs 1.8"
  • Light weight: 502 g vs 285 g
arrow Compare the EOS Digital Rebel XS vs the PowerShot SX120 IS

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX120 IS compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (10x vs 4x), has a significantly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), slightly closer macro focusing (1 cm vs 4 cm) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2500 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (36 mm vs 28 mm), is much larger (mid size 111x71x45 mm vs ultra compact 87x56x18 mm), takes much lower resolution photos (8.6 MP vs 9.8 MP) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO).

Sony Cybershot W570

Sony Cybershot DSC-W570
1 year newer
$129

Significant advantages of the W570 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much smaller: Ultra compact 91x51x19 mm vs Mid size 111x71x45 mm
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 36 mm
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 8.6 MP

Significant disadvantages of the W570 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Significantly worse macro capability: 5 cm vs 1 cm
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second

common strengths of the W570 and SX120 IS

  • Wide aperture: f/2.6 vs f/2.8
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-W570 vs the Canon PowerShot SX120 IS

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS
6 months older

Significant advantages of the SD780 IS (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much smaller: Ultra compact 87x56x18 mm vs Mid size 111x71x45 mm
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8.6 MP
  • Better wide angle: 33 mm vs 36 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SD780 IS (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.0"
  • Less zoom: 3x vs 10x
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second

common strengths of the SD780 IS and SX120 IS

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the SD780 IS vs the SX120 IS

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330
4 months newer
$139 - $149

Significant advantages of the DSC-W330 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much smaller: Ultra compact 96x57x17 mm vs Mid size 111x71x45 mm
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 36 mm
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8.6 MP

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W330 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-W330 and SX120 IS

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.8
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 vs the Canon PowerShot SX120 IS

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX120 IS compared to compact competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (10x vs 5x), has a much larger screen (3.0" vs 2.0"), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), takes slightly higher resolution photos (8.6 MP vs 4.9 MP) and much closer macro focusing (1 cm vs 15 cm).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (36 mm vs 24 mm), is much larger (mid size 111x71x45 mm vs super compact 95x53x23 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$125 - $233

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much smaller: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Mid size 111x71x45 mm
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 36 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 480p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"

common strengths of the 300 HS and SX120 IS

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.8
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Good macro capabilities: 3 cm vs 1 cm
arrow Compare the ELPH 300 HS vs the PowerShot SX120 IS

Nikon Coolpix L10

Nikon Coolpix L10
2 years older

Significant advantages of the L10 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much smaller: Compact 90x61x26 mm vs Mid size 111x71x45 mm
  • Much thinner: 1" vs 1.8"
  • Much lighter: 165 g vs 285 g

Significant disadvantages of the L10 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 3.0"
  • Much lower true resolution: 4.9 MP vs 8.6 MP
  • Much worse macro capability: 15 cm vs 1 cm

common strengths of the L10 and SX120 IS

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L10 vs the Canon PowerShot SX120 IS

Sony Cybershot WX10

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX10
1 year newer
$210 - $238

Significant advantages of the WX10 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Much smaller: Super compact 95x53x23 mm vs Mid size 111x71x45 mm
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 36 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 480p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the WX10 (vs the SX120 IS)

  • Significantly worse macro capability: 5 cm vs 1 cm
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2500 of a second

common strengths of the WX10 and SX120 IS

  • Wide aperture: f/2.4 vs f/2.8
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-WX10 vs the Canon PowerShot SX120 IS