Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX10 IS compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (20x vs 12x), has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.3), slightly closer macro focusing (0 cm vs 5 cm), has a viewfinder (digital vs none) and supports an external flash.
However, on average it doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots) and is much larger (prosumer size 128x88x87 mm vs compact 105x59x34 mm).
Olympus SZ10
2 years newer
$222
|
Significant advantages of the SZ10 (vs the SX10 IS)
- Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
- Much smaller: Mid size 105x67x37 mm vs Prosumer size 128x88x87 mm
- Much lighter: 235 g vs 600 g
Significant disadvantages of the SZ10 (vs the SX10 IS)
- No external flash support
- No viewfinder: None vs Digital
- Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/3200 of a second
common strengths of the SZ10 and SX10 IS
- Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 0 cm
|
|
|
|
Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v
2 years newer
$289 - $328
|
Significant advantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the SX10 IS)
- Has a GPS
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 480p @ 30fps
- Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the SX10 IS)
- Narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.8
- Significantly worse macro capability: 5 cm vs 0 cm
- No external flash support
common strengths of the DSC-HX9v and SX10 IS
|
|
|
|
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
2 years newer
$219 - $304
|
Significant advantages of the SX230 HS (vs the SX10 IS)
- Has a GPS
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 480p @ 30fps
- Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
Significant disadvantages of the SX230 HS (vs the SX10 IS)
- Significantly worse macro capability: 5 cm vs 0 cm
- No external flash support
- No viewfinder: None vs Digital
common strengths of the SX230 HS and SX10 IS
- Fast max shutter speeds: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/3200 of a second
|
|
|
|
Nikon Coolpix S6200
2 years newer
$144 - $167
|
Significant advantages of the S6200 (vs the SX10 IS)
- Much smaller: Compact 93x58x26 mm vs Prosumer size 128x88x87 mm
- Better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
- Larger screen: 2.7" vs 2.5"
Significant disadvantages of the S6200 (vs the SX10 IS)
- Less zoom: 10x vs 20x
- Much worse macro capability: 10 cm vs 0 cm
- No external flash support
common strengths of the S6200 and SX10 IS
|
|
|
|
Canon PowerShot SX130 IS
1 year newer
$127 - $245
|
Significant advantages of the SX130 IS (vs the SX10 IS)
- Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
- Significantly smaller: Mid size 113x73x46 mm vs Prosumer size 128x88x87 mm
- Much lighter: 308 g vs 600 g
Significant disadvantages of the SX130 IS (vs the SX10 IS)
- Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/2.8
- No external flash support
- No viewfinder: None vs Digital
common strengths of the SX130 IS and SX10 IS
- Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 0 cm
|
|
|
|
Canon PowerShot SX150 IS
2 years newer
$168 - $193
|
Significant advantages of the SX150 IS (vs the SX10 IS)
- Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
- Significantly smaller: Mid size 113x73x46 mm vs Prosumer size 128x88x87 mm
- Much lighter: 306 g vs 600 g
Significant disadvantages of the SX150 IS (vs the SX10 IS)
- Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/2.8
- No external flash support
- No viewfinder: None vs Digital
common strengths of the SX150 IS and SX10 IS
- Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 0 cm
|
|
|
|