Super zoom Super zoom
September, 2008
Canon PowerShot SX10 IS

Canon PowerShotSX10 IS

Summary Canon SX10 IS

Prices Price
Camera only Unknown
Score Snapsort rank
Among similar cameras #n/a of 33
details
Specifications Key specs
Zoom Help 20x Screen size Help 2.5"
Aperture Help f/2.8 Screen resolution Help 230k dots
Wide angle Help 28 mm Movie format Help 480p @ 30fps
see all specifications
Canon PowerShot SX10 ISCanon PowerShot SX10 IS

Pros

The Canon SX10 IS vs other recent digicams

Aperture Wide aperture Help
f/2.8
Image stabilization Image stabilization Help
Lens
Viewfinder Doesn't use battery, see more detail Help
Digital
External flash External flash Help
Better lighting
Zoom Above average zoom Help
20x
Macro focus Good macro Help
0 cm
Fastest shutter speed Fast shutter speed Help
1/3200 of a second

Cons

The Canon SX10 IS vs other recent digicams

Movie format Low resolution movies Help
480p @ 30fps
Size Quite large Help
Prosumer size 128x88x87 mm
Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
0.7 fps
Thickness Thick Help
3.4"
Weight Very heavy Help
600 g
Screen resolution Low resolution screen Help
230k dots
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
1,600 ISO
Sensor type Sensor type Help
CCD
Announced Old Help
September, 2008

The Canon SX10 IS vs other recent super zooms

Zoom Poor zoom Help
20x
Screen size Very small screen Help
2.5"
Supports RAW No RAW support Help
Less editing fidelity
Light sensitivity (boost) Lacks boost light sensitivity Help
None
Wide angle Poor wide angle lens Help
28 mm
Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users

Appearance

front photo of the Canon PowerShot SX10 ISback photo of the Canon PowerShot SX10 ISangle photo of the Canon PowerShot SX10 IS

Discussion What do you think about the Canon PowerShot SX10 IS?

Speech is free, but discussion at Snapsort is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of this camera here, and discuss feedback for Snapsort at our support community.

Showing 1 comments

Buddyperx (2:27 AM, July 11, 2011)
Colours are OK but picture quality, especially when using the zoom.  does not seem to be as good as competitors in the same price range.