Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SD940 IS compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has better image stabilization (lens vs none), is slightly smaller (ultra compact 89x55x20 mm vs mid size 122x69x34 mm), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.5"), is significantly lighter (120 g vs 369 g) and has a built-in flash.
However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 16 MP) and significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO).
Olympus PEN E-P3
1 year newer
$849 - $900 17mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the E-P3 (vs the SD940 IS)
- Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
- Significantly higher resolution screen: 614k dots vs 230k dots
Significant disadvantages of the E-P3 (vs the SD940 IS)
- Significantly larger: Mid size 122x69x34 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
- Much heavier: 369 g vs 120 g
- Significantly thicker: 1.3" vs 0.8"
common strengths of the E-P3 and SD940 IS
- Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
- Thin: 1.3" vs 0.8"
- Each has a built-in flash
|
|
|
|
Sony NEX-5N
2 years newer
$598 - $600 (body only)
$650 - $698 18-55mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the NEX-5N (vs the SD940 IS)
- Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
- Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps
Significant disadvantages of the NEX-5N (vs the SD940 IS)
- No image stabilization: None vs Lens
- Larger: Compact 111x59x38 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
- Significantly thicker: 1.5" vs 0.8"
common strengths of the NEX-5N and SD940 IS
- Fairly small: Compact 111x59x38 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
- Light weight: 269 g vs 120 g
|
|
|
|