As well as being compared against other ultra compacts, the Canon PowerShot SD940 IS is also often compared to waterproofs, pro digicams, travel zooms, compacts and mirrorless. The Canon PowerShot SD940 IS's top rivals come from Canon (such as the ELPH 100 HS and the ELPH 300 HS) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 and the Cyber-shot DSC-W350)

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SD940 IS compared to other ultra compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 33 mm), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 8.1 MP), has a marginally larger sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2.7" 5.6x4.2mm), slightly closer macro focusing (3 cm vs 8 cm) and slightly longer exposures (15 seconds vs 4 seconds).

However, on average it lacks a built in panoramas, is older (august, 2009 vs february, 2011) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS
6 months older

Significant advantages of the SD780 IS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SD780 IS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Much worse wide angle: 33 mm vs 28 mm
  • Heavier: 160 g vs 120 g

common strengths of the SD780 IS and SD940 IS

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Capture very high resolution images: 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
arrow Compare the SD780 IS vs the SD940 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS
5 months newer
$225

Significant advantages of the SD1400 IS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD1400 IS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD1400 IS and SD940 IS

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Capture very high resolution images: 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
arrow Compare the SD1400 IS vs the SD940 IS

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1
similar age
$293

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Has a touch screen
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.8
  • Much lower true resolution: 8.1 MP vs 9.8 MP

common strengths of the DSC-TX1 and SD940 IS

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 vs the Canon PowerShot SD940 IS

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
4 months newer
$164 - $183

Significant advantages of the DSC-W350 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W350 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-W350 and SD940 IS

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.8
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Capture very high resolution images: 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 vs the Canon PowerShot SD940 IS

Nikon Coolpix S3100

Nikon Coolpix S3100
1 year newer
$125

Significant advantages of the S3100 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the S3100 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Much worse macro capability: 10 cm vs 3 cm

common strengths of the S3100 and SD940 IS

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S3100 vs the Canon PowerShot SD940 IS

Sony Cybershot W570

Sony Cybershot DSC-W570
1 year newer
$135

Significant advantages of the W570 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the W570 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • None found

common strengths of the W570 and SD940 IS

  • Wide aperture: f/2.6 vs f/2.8
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-W570 vs the Canon PowerShot SD940 IS

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SD940 IS compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a much wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.9), is slightly smaller (ultra compact 89x55x20 mm vs compact 95x62x22 mm), has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift) and slightly longer exposures (15 seconds vs 1/4 of a second).

However, on average it doesn't shoot as fast continuously (0.8 fps vs 5 fps), slightly worse macro focusing (3 cm vs 1 cm), is older (august, 2009 vs february, 2010), is not waterproof and has a slower max shutter speed (1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second).

Olympus Stylus Tough 6020

Olympus Stylus Tough 6020
5 months newer
$179

Significant advantages of the Tough 6020 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Waterproof
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the Tough 6020 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.9 vs f/2.8

common strengths of the Tough 6020 and SD940 IS

  • Fairly small: Compact 95x62x22 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
  • Light weight: 122 g vs 120 g
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.8"
arrow Compare the Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 vs the Canon PowerShot SD940 IS

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SD940 IS compared to pro digicam competitors include: it is slightly lighter (120 g vs 401 g).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a significantly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/2.0), has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0") and has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 461k dots).

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
2 years newer
$356 - $430

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Shoots RAW
  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/2.8

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • None found

common strengths of the S100 and SD940 IS

  • Fairly small: Compact 99x60x28 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
  • Light weight: 198 g vs 120 g
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.8"
arrow Compare the Powershot S100 vs the PowerShot SD940 IS

Canon PowerShot S95

Canon PowerShot S95
1 year newer
$354 - $389

Significant advantages of the S95 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/2.8

Significant disadvantages of the S95 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • None found

common strengths of the S95 and SD940 IS

  • Fairly small: Compact 99x58x29 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
  • Light weight: 193 g vs 120 g
  • Thin: 1.2" vs 0.8"
arrow Compare the S95 vs the SD940 IS

Canon PowerShot SD4000 IS

Canon PowerShot SD4000 IS
8 months newer
$294

Significant advantages of the SD4000 IS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/2.8
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SD4000 IS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD4000 IS and SD940 IS

  • Fairly small: Super compact 100x54x23 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
  • Light weight: 175 g vs 120 g
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.8"
arrow Compare the SD4000 IS vs the SD940 IS

Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12
1 year newer
$398 - $496

Significant advantages of the G12 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the G12 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Larger: Mid size 112x76x48 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
  • Much heavier: 401 g vs 120 g
  • Thicker: 1.9" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the G12 and SD940 IS

  • None found
arrow Compare the G12 vs the SD940 IS

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SD940 IS compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.2), is significantly smaller (ultra compact 89x55x20 mm vs compact 103x57x27 mm), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.1") and is significantly lighter (120 g vs 183 g).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (4x vs 12.5x), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 461k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Olympus VR320

Olympus VR-320
1 year newer
$145

Significant advantages of the VR320 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 12.5x vs 4x
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the VR320 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 100x58x28 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the VR320 and SD940 IS

  • Wide aperture: f/3.0 vs f/2.8
  • Light weight: 153 g vs 120 g
arrow Compare the Olympus VR-320 vs the Canon PowerShot SD940 IS

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
2 years newer
$195 - $196

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Supports 24p
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • None found

common strengths of the 310 HS and SD940 IS

  • Wide aperture: f/3.0 vs f/2.8
  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x57x22 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
  • Very light: 140 g vs 120 g
arrow Compare the ELPH 310 HS vs the PowerShot SD940 IS

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
1 year newer
$239 - $307

Significant advantages of the SX230 HS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly more zoom: 14x vs 4x
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the SX230 HS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Much larger: Compact 106x59x33 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
  • Much heavier: 215 g vs 120 g
  • Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the SX230 HS and SD940 IS

  • None found
arrow Compare the SX230 HS vs the SD940 IS

Canon PowerShot SD4500 IS

Canon PowerShot SD4500 IS
1 year newer
$139 - $343

Significant advantages of the SD4500 IS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Supports 24p
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the SD4500 IS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/2.8
  • Significantly heavier: 190 g vs 120 g

common strengths of the SD4500 IS and SD940 IS

  • Fairly small: Compact 101x59x22 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.8"
arrow Compare the SD4500 IS vs the SD940 IS

Nikon Coolpix S8000

Nikon Coolpix S8000
5 months newer

Significant advantages of the S8000 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the S8000 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.8
  • Significantly larger: Compact 103x57x27 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
  • Significantly heavier: 183 g vs 120 g

common strengths of the S8000 and SD940 IS

  • Fairly small: Compact 103x57x27 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S8000 vs the Canon PowerShot SD940 IS

Nikon Coolpix S6200

Nikon Coolpix S6200
2 years newer
$177 - $223

Significant advantages of the S6200 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the S6200 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Much worse macro capability: 10 cm vs 3 cm
  • Heavier: 160 g vs 120 g
  • Thicker: 1" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the S6200 and SD940 IS

  • Fairly small: Compact 93x58x26 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
  • Light weight: 160 g vs 120 g
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.8"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S6200 vs the Canon PowerShot SD940 IS

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SD940 IS compared to compact competitors include: it takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 8 MP) and is slightly lighter (120 g vs 165 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS
1 year newer
$109 - $189

Significant advantages of the 100 HS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Supports 24p
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the 100 HS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • None found

common strengths of the 100 HS and SD940 IS

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x55x19 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the ELPH 100 HS vs the PowerShot SD940 IS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$149 - $179

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • None found

common strengths of the 300 HS and SD940 IS

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.8
  • Fairly small: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the ELPH 300 HS vs the PowerShot SD940 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
2 years newer
$229

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • None found

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and SD940 IS

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.8
  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x57x20 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the ELPH 110 HS vs the SD940 IS

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
2 years newer
$249

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 2.7"
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • None found

common strengths of the 320 HS and SD940 IS

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.8
  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x57x21 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the ELPH 320 HS vs the PowerShot SD940 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1100 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1100 IS
1 year older

Significant advantages of the SD1100 IS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SD1100 IS (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much lower true resolution: 8 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm

common strengths of the SD1100 IS and SD940 IS

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Fairly small: Super compact 86x54x22 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the SD1100 IS vs the SD940 IS

Canon PowerShot A490

Canon PowerShot A490
4 months newer
$102

Significant advantages of the A490 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the A490 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Much worse wide angle: 37 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Significantly larger: Compact 94x62x31 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm

common strengths of the A490 and SD940 IS

  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 3 cm
arrow Compare the A490 vs the SD940 IS

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SD940 IS compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has better image stabilization (lens vs none), is slightly smaller (ultra compact 89x55x20 mm vs mid size 122x69x34 mm), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.5"), is significantly lighter (120 g vs 369 g) and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 16 MP) and significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO).

Olympus PEN E-P3

Olympus PEN E-P3
1 year newer
$849 - $900 17mm lens

Significant advantages of the E-P3 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 614k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the E-P3 (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Significantly larger: Mid size 122x69x34 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
  • Much heavier: 369 g vs 120 g
  • Significantly thicker: 1.3" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the E-P3 and SD940 IS

  • Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 0.8"
  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Olympus PEN E-P3 vs the Canon PowerShot SD940 IS

Sony NEX-5N

Sony NEX-5N
2 years newer
$598 - $600 (body only)
$650 - $698 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the NEX-5N (vs the SD940 IS)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the NEX-5N (vs the SD940 IS)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Larger: Compact 111x59x38 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.5" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the NEX-5N and SD940 IS

  • Fairly small: Compact 111x59x38 mm vs Ultra compact 89x55x20 mm
  • Light weight: 269 g vs 120 g
arrow Compare the Sony NEX-5N vs the Canon PowerShot SD940 IS