As well as being compared against other compacts, the Canon PowerShot SD750 is also often compared to ultra compacts and travel zooms. The Canon PowerShot SD750's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SD1300 IS and the PowerShot S120) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-FX30)
Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SD750 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), is much smaller (super compact (92×57×20 mm) vs compact (100×59×29 mm)), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.1"), is slightly lighter (170 g vs 217 g) and is significantly less expensive ($158.00 vs $1,330.59).
However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/2), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 922k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (7.1 MP vs 12 MP).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SD750 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.5") and is slightly less expensive ($158.00 vs $670.13).
However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), is slightly larger (super compact (92×57×20 mm) vs ultra compact (86×54×19 mm)), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), is older (february 2007 vs february 2009) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SD750 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.2), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7") and is slightly less expensive ($158.00 vs $399.00).
However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 922k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), takes slightly lower resolution photos (7.1 MP vs 9.7 MP) and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (1.7 fps vs 6 fps).
