Summary Canon SD1300 IS

Prices Price
Camera only
$194
Score Snapsort rank
Within its price range
#n/a of 22
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 37
Specifications Key specs
Zoom
Help 4x
Screen size
Help 2.7"
Aperture
Help f/2.8
Screen resolution
Help 230k dots
Wide angle
Help 28 mm
Movie format
Help 480p @ 30fps
see all specifications

Also known as: Canon IXY 200F, Canon IXUS 105

Canon PowerShot SD1300 ISCanon PowerShot SD1300 IS

Replacement

Canon has replaced the PowerShot SD1300 IS with the 100 HS.

Canon ELPH 100 HS
Canon ELPH 100 HS announced February 2011
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Screen size Much larger screen
Supports 24p Supports 24p

Compare the new Canon 100 HS vs the SD1300 IS

gallery

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS.

Pros

Report a correction

The Canon SD1300 IS vs other recent compacts

Size Quite small Help
Super compact (91×56×22 mm)
Thickness Thin Help
0.9"
Image stabilization Image stabilization Help
  1. Lens
Weight Light Help
140 g

Cons

Report a correction

The Canon SD1300 IS vs other recent compacts

Zoom Below average zoom Help
4x
Wide angle Poor wide angle lens Help
28 mm
Screen size Small screen Help
2.7"
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
1,600 ISO
Sensor size Slightly smaller than average sensor Help
1/2.3" 6.16x4.62mm
Announced Old Help
February 2010
Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
1/1500 of a second
Movie format Low resolution movies Help
480p @ 30fps
Screen resolution Low resolution screen Help
230k dots
Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
0.9 fps
Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
Sensor type Sensor type Help
CCD
Viewfinder Can only preview photos on the screen Help
None
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users

Appearance

front photo of the Canon PowerShot SD1300 ISback photo of the Canon PowerShot SD1300 ISangle photo of the Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS

Discussion

Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS
PowerShot SD1300 IS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments