Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SD1200 IS compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.2), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), takes significantly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 7.1 MP), has a marginally larger sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm) and is significantly lighter (120 g vs 170 g).
However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0"), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), is thicker (0.9" vs 0.7") and has a slower max shutter speed (1/1500 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second).
Canon PowerShot SD780 IS
similar age
|
Significant advantages of the SD780 IS (vs the SD1200 IS)
Significant disadvantages of the SD780 IS (vs the SD1200 IS)
common strengths of the SD780 IS and SD1200 IS
- Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
- Capture very high resolution images: 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
- Both have tunnel viewfinders: Tunnel vs Tunnel
|
|
|
|
Canon PowerShot SD1000
2 years older
|
Significant advantages of the SD1000 (vs the SD1200 IS)
Significant disadvantages of the SD1000 (vs the SD1200 IS)
- Much lower true resolution: 7.1 MP vs 9.8 MP
- No image stabilization: None vs Lens
- Much smaller sensor: 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
common strengths of the SD1000 and SD1200 IS
- Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
- Both have tunnel viewfinders: Tunnel vs Tunnel
|
|
|
|
Canon PowerShot SD770 IS
1 year older
|
Significant advantages of the SD770 IS (vs the SD1200 IS)
Significant disadvantages of the SD770 IS (vs the SD1200 IS)
- Significantly heavier: 170 g vs 120 g
common strengths of the SD770 IS and SD1200 IS
- Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
- Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
- Capture very high resolution images: 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
|
|
|
|
Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS
3 years newer
$349
|
Significant advantages of the ELPH 530 HS (vs the SD1200 IS)
- Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
- Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
- Significantly more zoom: 12x vs 3x
Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 530 HS (vs the SD1200 IS)
- Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/2.8
- No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel
- Heavier: 163 g vs 120 g
common strengths of the ELPH 530 HS and SD1200 IS
- Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
|
|
|
|