Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon 800 IS compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.4), is significantly smaller (compact (90×57×26 mm) vs professional size (123×87×106 mm)), is thinner (1" vs 4.2") and is significantly lighter (195 g vs 595 g).
However, on average it has slightly less zoom (4x vs 50x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2.5" vs 2.8"), has a significantly lower resolution screen (173k dots vs 461k dots) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (5.9 MP vs 9.7 MP).
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
6 years newer
Significant advantages of the SX50 HS (vs the 800 IS)
- Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
- Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
- Significantly higher resolution screen: 461k dots vs 173k dots
Significant disadvantages of the SX50 HS (vs the 800 IS)
- Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/2.8
- Significantly larger: Professional size (123×87×106 mm) vs Compact (90×57×26 mm)
- Significantly thicker: 4.2" vs 1"
common strengths of the SX50 HS and 800 IS
- Fairly small: Professional size (123×87×106 mm) vs Compact (90×57×26 mm)
- Light weight: 595 g vs 195 g
- Thin: 4.2" vs 1"