Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon 550D compared to pro DSLR competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 230k dots), uses fast phase detection autofocus (phase detection vs contrast detection), is newer (february, 2010 vs september, 2008), is slightly smaller (prosumer size 129x98x62 mm vs professional size 152x114x75 mm) and is thinner (2.4" vs 3").
However, on average it is slightly more noisy at high ISO (784 ISO vs 1,815 ISO), slightly smaller viewfinder (0.54x vs 0.71x), it's body is not weather sealed, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3.7 fps vs 6 fps) and has a marginally smaller sensor (APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs full frame 36.0x24.0mm).
Canon EOS 60D
6 months newer
$848 - $1,304 (body only)
$1,177 - $1,342 18-135mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the 60D (vs the 550D)
- Has a flip-out screen
- Much faster max shutter speed: 1/8000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second
Significant disadvantages of the 60D (vs the 550D)
- Much thicker: 3.1" vs 2.4"
common strengths of the 60D and 550D
- Many lenses available: 162 lenses vs 162 lenses
- Fairly small: Professional size 145x106x79 mm vs Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm
- Supports RAW
|
|
|
|
Canon EOS 7D
5 months older
$1,509 - $1,821 (body only)
$1,429 - $1,849 18-135mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the 7D (vs the 550D)
- Weather sealed
- Significantly less shutter lag: 131 ms vs 252 ms
- Shoots significantly faster: 8 fps vs 3.7 fps
Significant disadvantages of the 7D (vs the 550D)
- Significantly thicker: 2.9" vs 2.4"
- Significantly heavier: 860 g vs 530 g
common strengths of the 7D and 550D
- Many lenses available: 162 lenses vs 162 lenses
- Fairly small: Professional size 148x111x74 mm vs Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm
- Supports RAW
|
|
|
|
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
1 year older
$2,189 (body only)
$2,899 - $2,999 24-105mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the 5D Mark II (vs the 550D)
- Significantly lower noise at high ISO: 1,815 ISO vs 784 ISO
- Significantly better image quality: 79.0 vs 66.0
- Better color depth: 23.7 bits vs 22.1 bits
Significant disadvantages of the 5D Mark II (vs the 550D)
- Larger: Professional size 152x114x75 mm vs Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm
- Much thicker: 3" vs 2.4"
- Significantly heavier: 850 g vs 530 g
common strengths of the 5D Mark II and 550D
- Fairly small: Professional size 152x114x75 mm vs Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm
- Supports RAW
- Thin: 3" vs 2.4"
|
|
|
|
Canon EOS 50D
1 year older
$1,075 - $1,282 (body only)
$1,980 18-200mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the 50D (vs the 550D)
- Significantly less shutter lag: 131 ms vs 252 ms
- Much faster max shutter speed: 1/8000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second
Significant disadvantages of the 50D (vs the 550D)
- Does not take movies: None vs 1080p @ 30fps
- Worse color depth: 21.8 bits vs 22.1 bits
- Significantly thicker: 2.9" vs 2.4"
common strengths of the 50D and 550D
- Many lenses available: 162 lenses vs 162 lenses
- Fairly small: Professional size 146x108x74 mm vs Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm
- Supports RAW
|
|
|
|
Canon EOS 40D
2 years older
$650 (body only)
|
Significant advantages of the 40D (vs the 550D)
- Much faster max shutter speed: 1/8000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second
Significant disadvantages of the 40D (vs the 550D)
- Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 1,040k dots
- Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
- Does not take movies: None vs 1080p @ 30fps
common strengths of the 40D and 550D
- Many lenses available: 162 lenses vs 162 lenses
- Fairly small: Professional size 146x108x74 mm vs Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm
- Supports RAW
|
|
|
|
Canon EOS 5D Mark III
2 years newer
$3,499 - $3,500 (body only)
$4,299 - $4,300 24-105mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the 5D Mark III (vs the 550D)
- Significantly lower noise at high ISO: 2,293 ISO vs 784 ISO
- Significantly better image quality: 81.0 vs 66.0
- Better color depth: 24 bits vs 22.1 bits
Significant disadvantages of the 5D Mark III (vs the 550D)
- Significantly larger: Professional size 152x116x76 mm vs Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm
- Much thicker: 3" vs 2.4"
- Significantly heavier: 950 g vs 530 g
common strengths of the 5D Mark III and 550D
- Fairly small: Professional size 152x116x76 mm vs Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm
- Supports RAW
- Thin: 3" vs 2.4"
|
|
|
|