As well as being compared against other ultra compacts, the Canon Digital IXUS 40 is also often compared to pro DSLRs, mirrorless, pro digicams, travel zooms, entry-level DSLRs and compacts. The Canon Digital IXUS 40's top rivals come from Canon (such as the Digital IXUS 210 IS and the PowerShot A3500 IS) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II and the CyberShot DSC-W730)

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon Digital IXUS 40 compared to other ultra compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (35 mm vs 37 mm) and has higher quality type of viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and is older (september 2004 vs january 2008).

Samsung L100

Samsung L100
3 years newer
$140

Significant advantages of the L100 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the L100 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • None found

common strengths of the L100 and Digital IXUS 40

  • None found

Canon Digital IXUS 30

Placeholder
similar age

Significant advantages of the Digital IXUS 30 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Digital IXUS 30 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • None found

common strengths of the Digital IXUS 30 and Digital IXUS 40

  • None found

compared toPro DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon Digital IXUS 40 compared to pro DSLR competitors include: it is much smaller (ultra compact (86×54×21 mm) vs large (156×157×80 mm)), is thinner (0.8" vs 3.1"), is much lighter (147 g vs 1,230 g) and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3.2"), has a much lower resolution screen (118k dots vs 1,040k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (3.9 MP vs 24.2 MP) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon EOS 1D Mark IV

Canon EOS-1D Mark IV
5 years newer
$2,362 (body only)

Significant advantages of the 1D Mark IV (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Has a through-the-lens viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Tunnel

Significant disadvantages of the 1D Mark IV (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.8"
  • Much larger: Large (156×157×80 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much heavier: 1,230 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the 1D Mark IV and Digital IXUS 40

  • None found

Nikon D750

Nikon D750
10 years newer
$1,329 - $1,697 (body only)
$1,821 - $2,197 24-120mm lens

Significant advantages of the D750 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 2"
  • Has a through-the-lens viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Tunnel

Significant disadvantages of the D750 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.8"
  • Much larger: Professional size (141×113×78 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Significantly heavier: 750 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the D750 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Fairly small: Professional size (141×113×78 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 0.8"
  • Light weight: 750 g vs 147 g

Canon EOS 7D Mark II

Canon EOS 7D Mark II
8 years newer
$1,095 - $1,799 (body only)
$1,449 - $1,799 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the 7D Mark II (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Has a through-the-lens viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Tunnel

Significant disadvantages of the 7D Mark II (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.8"
  • Much larger: Professional size (149×112×78 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much heavier: 910 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the 7D Mark II and Digital IXUS 40

  • Fairly small: Professional size (149×112×78 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 0.8"
  • Light weight: 910 g vs 147 g

Nikon D610

Nikon D610
9 years newer
$880 - $1,497 (body only)
$1,453 - $1,997 24-85mm lens

Significant advantages of the D610 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 2"
  • Has a through-the-lens viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Tunnel

Significant disadvantages of the D610 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much thicker: 3.2" vs 0.8"
  • Much larger: Professional size (141×113×82 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Significantly heavier: 760 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the D610 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Fairly small: Professional size (141×113×82 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Light weight: 760 g vs 147 g
  • Built-in flashes

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon Digital IXUS 40 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.5"), is slightly lighter (147 g vs 276 g) and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (118k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,200 fps), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift) and takes much lower resolution photos (3.9 MP vs 17.9 MP).

Nikon 1 J4

Nikon 1 J4
9 years newer
$291 10-30mm lens

Significant advantages of the J4 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Records high-speed movies: 1,200 fps vs None
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,037k dots vs 118k dots

Significant disadvantages of the J4 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the J4 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Fairly small: Compact (100×60×29 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very light: 192 g vs 147 g
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.8"

Olympus PEN E-PL5

Olympus PEN E-PL5
8 years newer
$499 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the E-PL5 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the E-PL5 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel
  • Heavier: 325 g vs 147 g
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the E-PL5 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Fairly small: Mid size (111×64×38 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Light weight: 325 g vs 147 g
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 0.8"

Sony NEX 5R

Sony NEX 5R
8 years newer

Significant advantages of the 5R (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 118k dots
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the 5R (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the 5R and Digital IXUS 40

  • Fairly small: Mid size (111×59×39 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Light weight: 276 g vs 147 g
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 0.8"

Canon EOS M

Canon EOS M
7 years newer
$629 (body only)
$699 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the EOS M (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 118k dots
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the EOS M (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel
  • Heavier: 298 g vs 147 g
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the EOS M and Digital IXUS 40

  • Fairly small: Compact (109×66×32 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Light weight: 298 g vs 147 g
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 0.8"

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon Digital IXUS 40 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it is significantly smaller (ultra compact (86×54×21 mm) vs compact (102×58×38 mm)), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.5"), is much lighter (147 g vs 281 g) and has higher quality type of viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly smaller sensor (1/2.5" 5.75x4.31mm vs 1" 13.2x8.8mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/1.8), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a significantly smaller screen (2" vs 3") and has a much lower resolution screen (118k dots vs 1,229k dots).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II
8 years newer
$548 - $598

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 II (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger sensor: 1" 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.5" 5.75x4.31mm
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 II (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger: Compact (102×58×38 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.5" vs 0.8"
  • Much heavier: 281 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 II and Digital IXUS 40

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III
9 years newer
$648 - $782

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.5" 5.75x4.31mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger: Compact (102×58×41 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.6" vs 0.8"
  • Much heavier: 290 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 III and Digital IXUS 40

  • Viewfinders: Digital vs Tunnel

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3
3 years newer
$781

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX3 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX3 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Significantly larger: Compact (109×60×27 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Significantly heavier: 265 g vs 147 g
  • Thicker: 1.1" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the DMC-LX3 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Fairly small: Compact (109×60×27 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.8"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon Digital IXUS 40 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.3), is slightly smaller (ultra compact (86×54×21 mm) vs compact (99×60×27 mm)), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.1") and has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, has a significantly smaller screen (2" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (118k dots vs 460k dots) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).

Sony CyberShot DSC-W730

Sony CyberShot DSC-W730
8 years newer
$131

Significant advantages of the DSC-W730 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 2.7" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W730 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the DSC-W730 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Very small: Super compact (93×52×23 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.8"
  • Very light: 122 g vs 147 g

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000
10 years newer
$178

Significant advantages of the S7000 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the S7000 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Larger: Compact (99×60×27 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Thicker: 1.1" vs 0.8"
  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the S7000 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Very small: Compact (99×60×27 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.8"
  • Very light: 165 g vs 147 g

Canon IXUS 150

Canon IXUS 150
9 years newer
$222

Significant advantages of the IXUS 150 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 2.7" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 150 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the IXUS 150 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Very small: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.8"
  • Very light: 130 g vs 147 g

Panasonic Lumix TZ30

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ30
7 years newer
$763

Significant advantages of the TZ30 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the TZ30 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Significantly larger: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.8"
  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the TZ30 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Very small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.8"
  • Light weight: 206 g vs 147 g

Canon IXUS 265 HS

Canon IXUS 265 HS
9 years newer

Significant advantages of the IXUS 265 HS (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 265 HS (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the IXUS 265 HS and Digital IXUS 40

  • Very small: Compact (100×58×22 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.8"
  • Very light: 147 g vs 147 g

Canon IXUS 230 HS

Canon IXUS 230 HS
7 years newer
$216

Significant advantages of the IXUS 230 HS (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    2. Sensor shift
    vs None
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 230 HS (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the IXUS 230 HS and Digital IXUS 40

  • Very small: Super compact (96×57×22 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.8"
  • Very light: 140 g vs 147 g

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon Digital IXUS 40 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it is much smaller (ultra compact (86×54×21 mm) vs prosumer size (129×98×78 mm)), is thinner (0.8" vs 3") and is much lighter (147 g vs 632 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (118k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift) and takes much lower resolution photos (3.9 MP vs 17.9 MP).

Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300
9 years newer
$469 - $500 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5300 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,037k dots vs 118k dots
  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the D5300 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size (124×99×76 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 0.8"
  • Much heavier: 480 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the D5300 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Light weight: 480 g vs 147 g

Sony Alpha DSLR-A300

Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the DSLR-A300 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 2.7" vs 2"
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None
  • Has a through-the-lens viewfinder: Pentamirror vs Tunnel

Significant disadvantages of the DSLR-A300 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Does not take movies: None vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Much larger: Prosumer size (131×99×75 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the DSLR-A300 and Digital IXUS 40

  • None found

Nikon D80

Nikon D80
1 year newer
$1,499 18-55mm, 55-200mm lenses

Significant advantages of the D80 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 2.5" vs 2"
  • Has a through-the-lens viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Tunnel
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 230k dots vs 118k dots

Significant disadvantages of the D80 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Does not take movies: None vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Much larger: Professional size (132×103×77 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the D80 and Digital IXUS 40

  • None found

Sony Alpha DSLR-A100

Sony Alpha DSLR-A100
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the DSLR-A100 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 2.5" vs 2"
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None
  • Has a through-the-lens viewfinder: Pentamirror vs Tunnel

Significant disadvantages of the DSLR-A100 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Does not take movies: None vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Much larger: Prosumer size (133×95×71 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much thicker: 2.8" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the DSLR-A100 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (133×95×71 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Thin: 2.8" vs 0.8"

Canon EOS 700D

Canon EOS 700D
8 years newer
$1,267 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the 700D (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 118k dots
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the 700D (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×79 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.8"
  • Much heavier: 580 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the 700D and Digital IXUS 40

  • None found

Nikon D5200

Nikon D5200
8 years newer
$614 (body only)

Significant advantages of the D5200 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 118k dots
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the D5200 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size (129×98×78 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.8"
  • Much heavier: 555 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the D5200 and Digital IXUS 40

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon Digital IXUS 40 compared to compact competitors include: it has higher quality type of viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), has a significantly smaller screen (2" vs 2.8"), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift), takes slightly lower resolution photos (3.9 MP vs 9.7 MP) and is older (september 2004 vs february 2009).

Canon Digital IXUS 210 IS

Canon Digital IXUS 210 IS
5 years newer

Significant advantages of the 210 IS (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3.5" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the 210 IS (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the 210 IS and Digital IXUS 40

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×56×22 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.8"

Canon PowerShot A3500 IS

Canon PowerShot A3500 IS
8 years newer
$180

Significant advantages of the A3500 IS (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the A3500 IS (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the A3500 IS and Digital IXUS 40

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (98×56×20 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.8"

Canon Digital IXUS 110 IS

Canon Digital IXUS 110 IS
4 years newer

Significant advantages of the 110 IS (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 2.8" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the 110 IS (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the 110 IS and Digital IXUS 40

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (98×54×22 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.8"

Canon Digital IXUS 430

Placeholder
7 months older

Significant advantages of the Digital IXUS 430 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Digital IXUS 430 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.8"
  • Heavier: 215 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the Digital IXUS 430 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Compact (87×57×28 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.8"

Canon Digital IXUS 60

Canon Digital IXUS 60
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the Digital IXUS 60 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Digital IXUS 60 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • None found

common strengths of the Digital IXUS 60 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (86×54×22 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.8"

Canon Digital IXUS 65

Canon Digital IXUS 65
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the Digital IXUS 65 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Significantly larger screen: 3" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the Digital IXUS 65 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the Digital IXUS 65 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (90×57×20 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.8"