As well as being compared against other ultra compacts, the Canon Digital IXUS 40 is also often compared to pro DSLRs, mirrorless, entry-level DSLRs, pro digicams, travel zooms, compacts and digicams. The Canon Digital IXUS 40's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-LX3 and the Lumix DMC-TZ18) and Canon (such as the IXUS 265 HS and the EOS 700D)

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon Digital IXUS 40 compared to other ultra compact competitors include: it has higher quality type of viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3.2"), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).

Canon PowerShot IXUS 510 HS

Canon IXUS 510 HS
7 years newer
$202

Significant advantages of the IXUS 510 HS (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 510 HS (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • None found

common strengths of the IXUS 510 HS and Digital IXUS 40

  • None found

Canon Digital IXUS 30

Placeholder
similar age

Significant advantages of the Digital IXUS 30 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Digital IXUS 30 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • None found

common strengths of the Digital IXUS 30 and Digital IXUS 40

  • None found

Canon Digital IXUS 50

Placeholder
4 months newer

Significant advantages of the Digital IXUS 50 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Digital IXUS 50 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • None found

common strengths of the Digital IXUS 50 and Digital IXUS 40

  • None found

compared toPro DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon Digital IXUS 40 compared to pro DSLR competitors include: it is much smaller (ultra compact (86×54×21 mm) vs large (156×157×80 mm)), is thinner (0.8" vs 3.1"), is much lighter (147 g vs 1,230 g) and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3.2"), has a significantly lower resolution screen (118k dots vs 1,040k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (3.9 MP vs 17.9 MP) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon EOS 7D Mark II

Canon EOS 7D Mark II
8 years newer
$1,073 - $1,499 (body only)
$1,499 - $1,949 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the 7D Mark II (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Has a through-the-lens viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Tunnel
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 7D Mark II (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.8"
  • Much larger: Professional size (149×112×78 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much heavier: 910 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the 7D Mark II and Digital IXUS 40

  • Fairly small: Professional size (149×112×78 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 0.8"
  • Light weight: 910 g vs 147 g

Canon EOS 70D

Canon EOS 70D
8 years newer
$949 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the 70D (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Has a through-the-lens viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Tunnel
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 70D (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.8"
  • Much larger: Professional size (145×106×79 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Significantly heavier: 755 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the 70D and Digital IXUS 40

  • Fairly small: Professional size (145×106×79 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 0.8"
  • Light weight: 755 g vs 147 g

Canon EOS 7D

Canon EOS 7D
5 years newer
$1,099 (body only)
$1,800 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the 7D (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Has a through-the-lens viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Tunnel
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 7D (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much thicker: 2.9" vs 0.8"
  • Much larger: Professional size (148×111×74 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Significantly heavier: 860 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the 7D and Digital IXUS 40

  • Fairly small: Professional size (148×111×74 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 2.9" vs 0.8"
  • Light weight: 860 g vs 147 g

Canon EOS 50D

Canon EOS 50D
3 years newer
$560 (body only)

Significant advantages of the 50D (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Has a through-the-lens viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Tunnel
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the 50D (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much thicker: 2.9" vs 0.8"
  • Much larger: Professional size (146×108×74 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Significantly heavier: 822 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the 50D and Digital IXUS 40

  • Fairly small: Professional size (146×108×74 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 2.9" vs 0.8"
  • Light weight: 822 g vs 147 g

Canon EOS 1D Mark IV

Canon EOS-1D Mark IV
5 years newer
$3,065 (body only)

Significant advantages of the 1D Mark IV (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Has a through-the-lens viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Tunnel
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 1D Mark IV (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.8"
  • Much larger: Large (156×157×80 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much heavier: 1,230 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the 1D Mark IV and Digital IXUS 40

  • Thin: 3.1" vs 0.8"

Nikon D4

Nikon D4
7 years newer
$5,499 (body only)

Significant advantages of the D4 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 2"
  • Has a through-the-lens viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Tunnel
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the D4 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much thicker: 3.6" vs 0.8"
  • Much larger: Large (160×157×91 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much heavier: 1,340 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the D4 and Digital IXUS 40

  • None found

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon Digital IXUS 40 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has higher quality type of viewfinder (tunnel vs none), is slightly smaller (ultra compact (86×54×21 mm) vs standard size (127×94×48 mm)), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.9"), is slightly lighter (147 g vs 417 g) and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (118k dots vs 1,229k dots), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,200 fps), takes much lower resolution photos (3.9 MP vs 24 MP) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (400 ISO vs 25,600 ISO).

Sony A7

Sony A7
9 years newer
$798 - $2,398 (body only)
$998 28-70mm lens

Significant advantages of the A7 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 118k dots
  • Much higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 3.9 MP

Significant disadvantages of the A7 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Significantly larger: Standard size (127×94×48 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Significantly heavier: 417 g vs 147 g
  • Significantly thicker: 1.9" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the A7 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Viewfinders: Digital vs Tunnel

Nikon 1 J4

Nikon 1 J4
9 years newer
$459 10-30mm lens

Significant advantages of the J4 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,037k dots vs 118k dots
  • Records high-speed movies: 1,200 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the J4 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the J4 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Fairly small: Compact (100×60×29 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very light: 192 g vs 147 g
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.8"

Canon EOS M

Canon EOS M
7 years newer
$335 - $679 (body only)
$549 - $599 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the EOS M (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 118k dots
  • Much higher true resolution: 17.9 MP vs 3.9 MP

Significant disadvantages of the EOS M (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel
  • Heavier: 298 g vs 147 g
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the EOS M and Digital IXUS 40

  • Fairly small: Compact (109×66×32 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Light weight: 298 g vs 147 g
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 0.8"

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon Digital IXUS 40 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it is much smaller (ultra compact (86×54×21 mm) vs professional size (129×101×78 mm)), is thinner (0.8" vs 3") and is much lighter (147 g vs 580 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (118k dots vs 920k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (3.9 MP vs 17.9 MP) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300
9 years newer
$402 (body only)
$349 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3300 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 118k dots
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the D3300 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size (124×98×76 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 0.8"
  • Significantly heavier: 430 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the D3300 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Light weight: 430 g vs 147 g

Canon EOS 700D

Canon EOS 700D
8 years newer
$1,490 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the 700D (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 118k dots
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the 700D (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×79 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.8"
  • Much heavier: 580 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the 700D and Digital IXUS 40

  • None found

Nikon D3000

Nikon D3000
4 years newer
$375 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3000 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Has a through-the-lens viewfinder: Pentamirror vs Tunnel
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 230k dots vs 118k dots

Significant disadvantages of the D3000 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Does not take movies: None vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Much larger: Prosumer size (126×97×64 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much thicker: 2.5" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the D3000 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Very small: Prosumer size (126×97×64 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 2.5" vs 0.8"
  • Light weight: 485 g vs 147 g

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6
11 years newer
$305 - $649 (body only)
$344 - $449 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the Rebel T6 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 118k dots
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the Rebel T6 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger: Professional size (129×101×78 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.8"
  • Much heavier: 485 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the Rebel T6 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Light weight: 485 g vs 147 g

Nikon D80

Nikon D80
1 year newer
$1,600 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the D80 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 2.5" vs 2"
  • Has a through-the-lens viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Tunnel
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 230k dots vs 118k dots

Significant disadvantages of the D80 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Does not take movies: None vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Much larger: Professional size (132×103×77 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the D80 and Digital IXUS 40

  • None found

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon Digital IXUS 40 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it is significantly smaller (ultra compact (86×54×21 mm) vs compact (109×60×27 mm)), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.1"), is much lighter (147 g vs 265 g) and has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2.5" 5.75x4.31mm vs 1/1.6" 8.3x6.2mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/2), records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm) and has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3").

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3
3 years newer
$382

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX3 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX3 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Significantly larger: Compact (109×60×27 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much heavier: 265 g vs 147 g
  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the DMC-LX3 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very small: Compact (109×60×27 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.8"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon Digital IXUS 40 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.3), is slightly smaller (ultra compact (86×54×21 mm) vs compact (105×58×33 mm)), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.3") and has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (118k dots vs 461k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Canon IXUS 265 HS

Canon IXUS 265 HS
9 years newer
$182

Significant advantages of the IXUS 265 HS (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 265 HS (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.6 vs f/2.8
  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the IXUS 265 HS and Digital IXUS 40

  • Very small: Compact (100×58×22 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.8"
  • Light weight: 147 g vs 147 g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ18

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ18
6 years newer
$275

Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ18 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ18 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger: Compact (105×58×33 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.3" vs 0.8"
  • Heavier: 210 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the DMC-TZ18 and Digital IXUS 40

  • None found

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145
9 years newer
$554

Significant advantages of the IXUS 145 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much larger screen: 2.7" vs 2"
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 145 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the IXUS 145 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Very small: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.8"
  • Light weight: 127 g vs 147 g

Canon IXUS 230 HS

Canon IXUS 230 HS
7 years newer
$251

Significant advantages of the IXUS 230 HS (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    2. Sensor shift
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 230 HS (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the IXUS 230 HS and Digital IXUS 40

  • Very small: Super compact (96×57×22 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.8"
  • Light weight: 140 g vs 147 g

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon Digital IXUS 40 compared to compact competitors include: it is slightly smaller (ultra compact (86×54×21 mm) vs compact (88×64×33 mm)), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.1"), is slightly lighter (147 g vs 230 g) and has higher quality type of viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2" vs 2.7"), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).

Canon Digital IXUS 400

Placeholder
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Digital IXUS 400 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the Digital IXUS 400 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 2"
  • Significantly heavier: 230 g vs 147 g
  • Thicker: 1.1" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the Digital IXUS 400 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Fairly small: Compact (87×57×28 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Both have tunnel viewfinders: Tunnel vs Tunnel

Canon Digital IXUS 65

Canon Digital IXUS 65
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the Digital IXUS 65 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the Digital IXUS 65 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the Digital IXUS 65 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Fairly small: Super compact (90×57×20 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.8"

Canon Digital IXUS 330

Placeholder
2 years older

Significant advantages of the Digital IXUS 330 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Digital IXUS 330 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 2"
  • Much larger: Compact (95×63×32 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Much heavier: 274 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the Digital IXUS 330 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.8
  • Both have tunnel viewfinders: Tunnel vs Tunnel

Canon IXUS 220 HS

Canon IXUS 220 HS
6 years newer
$219

Significant advantages of the IXUS 220 HS (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Much larger screen: 2.7" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 220 HS (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the IXUS 220 HS and Digital IXUS 40

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.8
  • Fairly small: Super compact (92×56×20 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.8"

Casio QV-R41

Placeholder
7 months older

Significant advantages of the QV-R41 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the QV-R41 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 39 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly larger: Compact (88×64×33 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.3" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the QV-R41 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Both have tunnel viewfinders: Tunnel vs Tunnel

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon Digital IXUS 40 compared to digicam competitors include: it is thinner (0.8" vs 2") and has higher quality type of viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (118k dots vs 460k dots), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).

Canon PowerShot A550

Canon PowerShot A550
2 years newer
$256

Significant advantages of the A550 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the A550 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • None found

common strengths of the A550 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Fairly small: Mid size (91×64×43 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Light weight: 210 g vs 147 g
  • Both have tunnel viewfinders: Tunnel vs Tunnel

Nikon Coolpix S5200

Nikon Coolpix S5200
8 years newer
$130

Significant advantages of the S5200 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S5200 (vs the Digital IXUS 40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the S5200 and Digital IXUS 40

  • Fairly small: Mid size (98×58×51 mm) vs Ultra compact (86×54×21 mm)
  • Light weight: 146 g vs 147 g