As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS is also often compared to pro digicams, super zooms and compacts. The Canon PowerShot SX260 HS's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SX280 HS and the PowerShot SX600 HS) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix ZS20 and the Lumix ZS30)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX260 HS compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it has a built-in GPS, records movies in 24p and creates panoramas in-camera.

However, on average it doesn't take 3D photos, has a slightly shorter battery life (210 shots vs 260 shots), is older (february, 2012 vs march, 2013) and is less popular.

Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Canon PowerShot SX280 HS
1 year newer
$320

Significant advantages of the SX280 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SX280 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No 24p support
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the SX280 HS and SX260 HS

  • Built-in GPS
  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the SX280 HS vs the SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX600 HS

Canon PowerShot SX600 HS
1 year newer
$199 - $252

Significant advantages of the SX600 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SX600 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No built-in GPS
  • No 24p support
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the SX600 HS and SX260 HS

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the PowerShot SX600 HS vs the PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS
1 year newer
$361 - $389

Significant advantages of the SX270 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SX270 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No built-in GPS
  • No 24p support

common strengths of the SX270 HS and SX260 HS

  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • In-camera panoramas
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the SX270 HS vs the SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX700 HS

Canon PowerShot SX700 HS
2 years newer
$299 - $300

Significant advantages of the SX700 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 922k dots vs 461k dots
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Significantly longer battery life: 360 shots vs 210 shots

Significant disadvantages of the SX700 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No built-in GPS
  • No 24p support
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the SX700 HS and SX260 HS

  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the PowerShot SX700 HS vs the PowerShot SX260 HS

Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
similar age
$329 - $399

Significant advantages of the ZS20 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Has a touch screen
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the ZS20 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No 24p support

common strengths of the ZS20 and SX260 HS

  • Built-in GPS
  • Very high speed movies: 220 fps vs 240 fps
  • In-camera panoramas
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 vs the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS
similar age
$262

Significant advantages of the SX240 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SX240 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the SX240 HS and SX260 HS

  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • In-camera panoramas
arrow Compare the SX240 HS vs the SX260 HS

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX260 HS compared to pro digicam competitors include: it records even higher-speed movies (240 fps vs none), records movies in 24p, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), creates panoramas in-camera and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a slightly smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.0), has a slightly lower resolution screen (461k dots vs 922k dots) and takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 20 MP).

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110
7 months newer
$230 - $249

Significant advantages of the S110 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the S110 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the S110 and SX260 HS

  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Inexpensive: $229.99 vs $243.99
arrow Compare the PowerShot S110 vs the PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
4 months older
$289 - $400

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much less shutter lag: 250 ms vs 510 ms

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the S100 and SX260 HS

  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Built-in GPS
  • Inexpensive: $289.00 vs $243.99
arrow Compare the Powershot S100 vs the PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120
1 year newer
$447 - $449

Significant advantages of the S120 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much less shutter lag: 173 ms vs 510 ms

Significant disadvantages of the S120 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No 24p support
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the S120 and SX260 HS

  • None found
arrow Compare the S120 vs the SX260 HS

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
3 months newer
$498

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No 24p support
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 240 fps
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and SX260 HS

  • In-camera panoramas
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 vs the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot S200

Canon PowerShot S200
2 years newer
$194

Significant advantages of the S200 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the S200 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 24fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the S200 and SX260 HS

  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Inexpensive: $193.53 vs $243.99
arrow Compare the S200 vs the SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12
1 year older
$509

Significant advantages of the G12 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Shoots RAW
  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the G12 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 24fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the G12 and SX260 HS

  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
arrow Compare the G12 vs the SX260 HS

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX260 HS compared to super zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (compact 106x61x33 mm vs prosumer size 111x75x91 mm), records movies in 24p, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), creates panoramas in-camera and is thinner (1.3" vs 3.6").

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (20x vs 50x), doesn't have a screen which flips out, lacks a built in HDR feature, has a slightly shorter battery life (210 shots vs 315 shots) and significantly worse macro focusing (5 cm vs 0 cm).

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS
1 year newer
$199 - $250

Significant advantages of the SX510 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Much better macro capability: 0 cm vs 5 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SX510 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly thicker: 3.1" vs 1.3"

common strengths of the SX510 HS and SX260 HS

  • Fairly small: Standard size 104x70x80 mm vs Compact 106x61x33 mm
  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
arrow Compare the SX510 HS vs the SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
7 months newer
$399 - $400

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX50 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Much more zoom: 50x vs 20x
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Much better macro capability: 0 cm vs 5 cm

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX50 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Much larger: Professional size 123x87x106 mm vs Compact 106x61x33 mm
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the PowerShot SX50 HS and SX260 HS

  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the PowerShot SX50 HS vs the PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX500 IS

Canon PowerShot SX500 IS
6 months newer
$235 - $274

Significant advantages of the SX500 IS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Significantly better macro capability: 1 cm vs 5 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SX500 IS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No 24p support
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 24fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the SX500 IS and SX260 HS

  • Fairly small: Standard size 104x69x80 mm vs Compact 106x61x33 mm
  • Light weight: 341 g vs 231 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 1.3"
arrow Compare the SX500 IS vs the SX260 HS

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
1 year newer
$197

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 461k dots
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No 24p support
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Compact 106x61x33 mm
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the L830 and SX260 HS

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Compact 106x61x33 mm
  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L830 vs the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX260 HS compared to compact competitors include: it has much more zoom (20x vs 5x), records movies in 24p, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), creates panoramas in-camera and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.7), is significantly larger (compact 106x61x33 mm vs super compact 93x57x20 mm), doesn't have a touch screen, slightly worse macro focusing (5 cm vs 3 cm) and is older (february, 2012 vs january, 2013).

Canon PowerShot A2500

Canon PowerShot A2500
1 year newer
$99 - $109

Significant advantages of the A2500 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Significantly smaller: Super compact 98x56x21 mm vs Compact 106x61x33 mm
  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
  • Significantly lighter: 125 g vs 231 g

Significant disadvantages of the A2500 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Significantly less zoom: 5x vs 20x
  • No 24p support
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 24fps

common strengths of the A2500 and SX260 HS

  • None found
arrow Compare the A2500 vs the SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
similar age
$211

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.5
  • Much smaller: Super compact 93x57x20 mm vs Compact 106x61x33 mm
  • Significantly lighter: 135 g vs 231 g

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Significantly less zoom: 5x vs 20x
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and SX260 HS

  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the ELPH 110 HS vs the SX260 HS

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$155 - $250

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.5
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact 94x57x21 mm vs Compact 106x61x33 mm
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Significantly less zoom: 5x vs 20x
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the 320 HS and SX260 HS

  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the ELPH 320 HS vs the PowerShot SX260 HS