As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS is also often compared to pro digicams, super zooms and compacts. The Canon PowerShot SX260 HS's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SX280 HS and the PowerShot SX240 HS) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix ZS20 and the Lumix ZS30)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX260 HS compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it has a built-in GPS, records movies in 24p, is slightly less expensive ($200.00 vs $296.95), is more popular and has a faster max shutter speed (1/3200 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second).

However, on average it slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3.2 fps vs 10 fps), lacks a built in HDR feature, doesn't take 3D photos and slightly worse macro focusing (5 cm vs 3 cm).

Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Canon PowerShot SX280 HS
1 year newer
$268 - $299

Significant advantages of the SX280 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the SX280 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No 24p support
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the SX280 HS and SX260 HS

  • Great zoom: 20x vs 20x
  • Built-in GPS
  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 24fps
arrow Compare the SX280 HS vs the SX260 HS

Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
similar age
$299 - $378

Significant advantages of the ZS20 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the ZS20 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No 24p support

common strengths of the ZS20 and SX260 HS

  • Great zoom: 20x vs 20x
  • Built-in GPS
  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 24fps
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 vs the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS
similar age
$219 - $678

Significant advantages of the SX240 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SX240 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the SX240 HS and SX260 HS

  • Great zoom: 20x vs 20x
  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 24fps
  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
arrow Compare the SX240 HS vs the SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS
1 year newer
$355 - $393

Significant advantages of the SX270 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SX270 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No built-in GPS
  • No 24p support

common strengths of the SX270 HS and SX260 HS

  • Great zoom: 20x vs 20x
  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 24fps
  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
arrow Compare the SX270 HS vs the SX260 HS

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V
similar age
$300 - $383

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX20V (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 461k dots
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX20V (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No 24p support
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 240 fps
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/3200 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-HX20V and SX260 HS

  • Great zoom: 20x vs 20x
  • Built-in GPS
  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 24fps
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V vs the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Nikon Coolpix S9500

Nikon Coolpix S9500
1 year newer
$297 - $327

Significant advantages of the S9500 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Significantly better macro capability: 1 cm vs 5 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S9500 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No 24p support
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/3200 of a second

common strengths of the S9500 and SX260 HS

  • Great zoom: 22x vs 20x
  • Built-in GPS
  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S9500 vs the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX260 HS compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (20x vs 4.2x), records even higher-speed movies (240 fps vs none), records movies in 24p, creates panoramas in-camera and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/1.8), has a significantly lower resolution screen (461k dots vs 921k dots) and takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 20 MP).

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
3 months older
$299

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the S100 and SX260 HS

  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Built-in GPS
arrow Compare the Powershot S100 vs the PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110
8 months newer
$349 - $399

Significant advantages of the S110 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.4x5.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm

Significant disadvantages of the S110 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 240 fps
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the S110 and SX260 HS

  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Inexpensive: $349.00 vs $200.00
  • Popularity: 14,848,037 vs 17,878,937
arrow Compare the PowerShot S110 vs the PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot G15

Canon PowerShot G15
8 months newer
$499

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G15 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.4x5.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G15 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the PowerShot G15 and SX260 HS

  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Popularity: 16,986,157 vs 17,878,937
arrow Compare the PowerShot G15 vs the PowerShot SX260 HS

Nikon Coolpix P310

Nikon Coolpix P310
similar age
$169 - $199

Significant advantages of the P310 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5
  • Many more focus points: 99 vs 9
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 461k dots

Significant disadvantages of the P310 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No 24p support
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 240 fps
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the P310 and SX260 HS

  • Very inexpensive: $169.00 vs $200.00
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P310 vs the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
5 months newer
$648 - $760

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No 24p support
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 240 fps
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and SX260 HS

  • Popularity: 27,277,615 vs 17,878,937
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 vs the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX260 HS compared to super zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (compact 106x61x33 mm vs professional size 123x87x106 mm), records movies in 24p, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), creates panoramas in-camera and is thinner (1.3" vs 4.2").

However, on average it has way more less zoom (20x vs 50x), has a slightly lower resolution screen (461k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3.2 fps vs 8 fps), doesn't have a screen which flips out and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Canon PowerShot SX500 IS

Canon PowerShot SX500 IS
7 months newer
$229

Significant advantages of the SX500 IS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • More zoom: 30x vs 20x
  • Significantly better macro capability: 1 cm vs 5 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SX500 IS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No 24p support
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 24fps
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 240 fps

common strengths of the SX500 IS and SX260 HS

  • Fairly small: Standard size 104x69x80 mm vs Compact 106x61x33 mm
  • Light weight: 341 g vs 231 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 1.3"
arrow Compare the SX500 IS vs the SX260 HS

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
9 months newer
$277

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 461k dots
  • Wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.5
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the SX260 HS)

  • No 24p support
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Compact 106x61x33 mm
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the L820 and SX260 HS

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps
  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Compact 106x61x33 mm
  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L820 vs the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
8 months newer
$369 - $450

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX50 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Much more zoom: 50x vs 20x
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX50 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Much larger: Professional size 123x87x106 mm vs Compact 106x61x33 mm
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the PowerShot SX50 HS and SX260 HS

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 24fps
  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
arrow Compare the PowerShot SX50 HS vs the PowerShot SX260 HS

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX260 HS compared to compact competitors include: it has way more more zoom (20x vs 5x), creates panoramas in-camera, has a slightly longer battery life (210 shots vs 170 shots), has a built-in GPS and is more popular.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.7), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (25 mm vs 24 mm), is much larger (compact 106x61x33 mm vs super compact 93x57x20 mm), doesn't have a touch screen and slightly worse macro focusing (5 cm vs 3 cm).

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
similar age
$199

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.5
  • Much smaller: Super compact 93x57x20 mm vs Compact 106x61x33 mm
  • Much thinner: 0.8" vs 1.3"

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Much less zoom: 5x vs 20x
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and SX260 HS

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 24fps
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 25 mm
  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
arrow Compare the ELPH 110 HS vs the SX260 HS

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$119 - $134

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.5
  • Much smaller: Super compact 94x57x21 mm vs Compact 106x61x33 mm
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the SX260 HS)

  • Much less zoom: 5x vs 20x
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the 320 HS and SX260 HS

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 24fps
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 25 mm
  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
arrow Compare the ELPH 320 HS vs the PowerShot SX260 HS