Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX260 HS compared to compact competitors include: it has way more more zoom (20x vs 5x), creates panoramas in-camera, has a slightly longer battery life (210 shots vs 170 shots), has a built-in GPS and is more popular.
However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.7), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (25 mm vs 24 mm), is much larger (compact 106x61x33 mm vs super compact 93x57x20 mm), doesn't have a touch screen and slightly worse macro focusing (5 cm vs 3 cm).
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
similar age
$199
|
Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the SX260 HS)
- Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.5
- Much smaller: Super compact 93x57x20 mm vs Compact 106x61x33 mm
- Much thinner: 0.8" vs 1.3"
Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the SX260 HS)
- Much less zoom: 5x vs 20x
- Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
- No built-in GPS
common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and SX260 HS
- Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 24fps
- Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 25 mm
- Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
|
|
|
|
Canon ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$119 - $134
|
Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the SX260 HS)
- Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.5
- Much smaller: Super compact 94x57x21 mm vs Compact 106x61x33 mm
- Has a touch screen
Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the SX260 HS)
- Much less zoom: 5x vs 20x
- Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
- No built-in GPS
common strengths of the 320 HS and SX260 HS
- Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 24fps
- Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 25 mm
- Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
|
|
|
|