As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Canon PowerShot SX280 HS is also often compared to pro digicams and super zooms. The Canon PowerShot SX280 HS's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SX260 HS and the PowerShot SX700 HS) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix ZS30 and the Lumix ZS25)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX280 HS compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it has a built-in GPS, slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO) and is more popular.

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (461k dots vs 920k dots), doesn't record movies in 24p, lacks a built in HDR feature, lacks a built in panoramas and doesn't take 3D photos.

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
similar age
$319 - $399

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 461k dots
  • Has a touch screen
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the ZS30 and SX280 HS

  • Built-in GPS
  • Very high speed movies: 220 fps vs 240 fps
  • Very good maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS30 vs the Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
1 year older
$200 - $300

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Supports 24p
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the SX260 HS and SX280 HS

  • Built-in GPS
  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the SX260 HS vs the SX280 HS

Canon PowerShot SX700 HS

Canon PowerShot SX700 HS
10 months newer
$349 - $354

Significant advantages of the SX700 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 922k dots vs 461k dots
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Significantly longer battery life: 360 shots vs 210 shots

Significant disadvantages of the SX700 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the SX700 HS and SX280 HS

  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Popularity: 6.475.277 vs 10.754.677
arrow Compare the PowerShot SX700 HS vs the PowerShot SX280 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS
similar age
$184 - $213

Significant advantages of the SX270 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the SX270 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the SX270 HS and SX280 HS

  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Very good maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the SX270 HS vs the SX280 HS

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V
similar age
$379 - $389

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX50V (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 461k dots
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX50V (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 240 fps

common strengths of the DSC-HX50V and SX280 HS

  • Built-in GPS
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Popularity: 12.075.888 vs 10.754.677
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V vs the Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
similar age
$230 - $328

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Much longer battery life: 500 shots vs 210 shots
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 240 fps

common strengths of the DSC-WX300 and SX280 HS

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Popularity: 5.633.196 vs 10.754.677
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 vs the Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX280 HS compared to pro digicam competitors include: it is newer (march, 2013 vs september, 2012), has a built-in GPS and is slightly less expensive ($199.00 vs $399.00).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/1.8), has a slightly lower resolution screen (461k dots vs 922k dots) and takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 20 MP).

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110
6 months older
$235 - $250

Significant advantages of the S110 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S110 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the S110 and SX280 HS

  • Inexpensive: $234.69 vs $199.00
  • Popularity: 11.264.700 vs 10.754.677
arrow Compare the PowerShot S110 vs the PowerShot SX280 HS

Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120
5 months newer
$449 - $450

Significant advantages of the S120 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm

Significant disadvantages of the S120 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the S120 and SX280 HS

  • Popularity: 12.506.071 vs 10.754.677
arrow Compare the S120 vs the SX280 HS

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
9 months older
$548

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 240 fps
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and SX280 HS

  • Popularity: 21.811.527 vs 10.754.677
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 vs the Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
1 year older
$297 - $350

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the S100 and SX280 HS

  • Built-in GPS
  • Inexpensive: $297.00 vs $199.00
arrow Compare the Powershot S100 vs the PowerShot SX280 HS

Canon PowerShot G16

Canon PowerShot G16
5 months newer
$499

Significant advantages of the G16 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW
  • Larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.4x5.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm

Significant disadvantages of the G16 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the G16 and SX280 HS

  • Popularity: 13.918.563 vs 10.754.677
arrow Compare the G16 vs the SX280 HS

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX280 HS compared to super zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (compact 106x63x33 mm vs professional size 123x87x106 mm), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), is thinner (1.3" vs 4.2") and is slightly lighter (233 g vs 470 g).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (20x vs 50x), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have a screen which flips out, lacks a built in HDR feature and lacks a built in panoramas.

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS
5 months newer
$219 - $230

Significant advantages of the SX510 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Supports 24p
  • Significantly better macro capability: 0 cm vs 5 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SX510 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly thicker: 3.1" vs 1.3"

common strengths of the SX510 HS and SX280 HS

  • Fairly small: Standard size 104x70x80 mm vs Compact 106x63x33 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Light weight: 349 g vs 233 g
arrow Compare the SX510 HS vs the SX280 HS

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
6 months older
$399 - $400

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX50 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Much more zoom: 50x vs 20x
  • Supports 24p
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX50 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Much larger: Professional size 123x87x106 mm vs Compact 106x63x33 mm
  • No built-in GPS
  • Much thicker: 4.2" vs 1.3"

common strengths of the PowerShot SX50 HS and SX280 HS

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Popularity: 27.882.592 vs 10.754.677
arrow Compare the PowerShot SX50 HS vs the PowerShot SX280 HS

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
similar age
$180 - $279

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 461k dots
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Larger: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Compact 106x63x33 mm
  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly thicker: 3.3" vs 1.3"

common strengths of the L820 and SX280 HS

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Compact 106x63x33 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Light weight: 470 g vs 233 g
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L820 vs the Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Canon PowerShot SX500 IS

Canon PowerShot SX500 IS
7 months older
$179 - $275

Significant advantages of the SX500 IS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Significantly better macro capability: 1 cm vs 5 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SX500 IS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 240 fps

common strengths of the SX500 IS and SX280 HS

  • Fairly small: Standard size 104x69x80 mm vs Compact 106x63x33 mm
  • Light weight: 341 g vs 233 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 1.3"
arrow Compare the SX500 IS vs the SX280 HS