As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Canon PowerShot SX280 HS is also often compared to pro digicams and super zooms. The Canon PowerShot SX280 HS's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SX700 HS and the PowerShot SX600 HS) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V and the Cyber-shot DSC-WX350)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX280 HS compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it has a built-in GPS and slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO).

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (461k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED), lacks a built in panoramas and doesn't take 3D photos.

Canon PowerShot SX700 HS

Canon PowerShot SX700 HS
10 months newer
$279 - $371

Significant advantages of the SX700 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 922k dots vs 461k dots
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Significantly longer battery life: 360 shots vs 210 shots

Significant disadvantages of the SX700 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the SX700 HS and SX280 HS

  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot SX600 HS

Canon PowerShot SX600 HS
9 months newer
$179 - $180

Significant advantages of the SX600 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SX600 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 240 fps

common strengths of the SX600 HS and SX280 HS

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
1 year older
$300 - $350

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Supports 24p
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the SX260 HS and SX280 HS

  • Built-in GPS
  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS
similar age
$372

Significant advantages of the SX270 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the SX270 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the SX270 HS and SX280 HS

  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V
similar age
$348 - $368

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX50V (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 461k dots
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX50V (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 240 fps

common strengths of the DSC-HX50V and SX280 HS

  • Built-in GPS
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Nikon Coolpix S9700

Nikon Coolpix S9700
10 months newer
$278 - $297

Significant advantages of the S9700 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 461k dots
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the S9700 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO

common strengths of the S9700 and SX280 HS

  • Built-in GPS
  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX280 HS compared to pro digicam competitors include: it is newer (march, 2013 vs september, 2012) and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a slightly smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/1.8), has a slightly lower resolution screen (461k dots vs 922k dots) and takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 20 MP).

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110
6 months older
$179 - $249

Significant advantages of the S110 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S110 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the S110 and SX280 HS

  • Inexpensive: $179.00 vs $270.59

Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120
5 months newer
$391 - $399

Significant advantages of the S120 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 922k dots vs 461k dots

Significant disadvantages of the S120 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the S120 and SX280 HS

  • None found

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
1 year older
$239 - $400

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the S100 and SX280 HS

  • Built-in GPS
  • Inexpensive: $239.00 vs $270.59

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
9 months older
$498

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 240 fps
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and SX280 HS

  • None found

Canon PowerShot G16

Canon PowerShot G16
5 months newer
$449 - $507

Significant advantages of the G16 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 922k dots vs 461k dots

Significant disadvantages of the G16 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the G16 and SX280 HS

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon SX280 HS compared to super zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (compact 106x63x33 mm vs professional size 123x87x106 mm), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO), is thinner (1.3" vs 4.2"), is significantly lighter (233 g vs 508 g) and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/3.0), has significantly less zoom (20x vs 42x), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have a screen which flips out and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS
5 months newer
$207 - $249

Significant advantages of the SX510 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 0 cm vs 5 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SX510 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly thicker: 3.1" vs 1.3"

common strengths of the SX510 HS and SX280 HS

  • Fairly small: Standard size 104x70x80 mm vs Compact 106x63x33 mm
  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
9 months newer
$197 - $246

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 461k dots
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Compact 106x63x33 mm
  • No built-in GPS
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO

common strengths of the L830 and SX280 HS

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Compact 106x63x33 mm
  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
6 months older
$349 - $399

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX50 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Significantly more zoom: 50x vs 20x
  • Supports 24p
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX50 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Much larger: Professional size 123x87x106 mm vs Compact 106x63x33 mm
  • No built-in GPS
  • Much thicker: 4.2" vs 1.3"

common strengths of the PowerShot SX50 HS and SX280 HS

  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot SX520 HS

Canon PowerShot SX520 HS
1 year newer
$249

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX520 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Significantly more zoom: 42x vs 20x

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX520 HS (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 120x82x92 mm vs Compact 106x63x33 mm
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 240 fps
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the PowerShot SX520 HS and SX280 HS

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Light weight: 441 g vs 233 g

Canon Powershot SX40

Canon Powershot SX40
1 year older
$405

Significant advantages of the SX40 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.5
  • Supports 24p
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the SX40 (vs the SX280 HS)

  • Much larger: Professional size 123x92x108 mm vs Compact 106x63x33 mm
  • No built-in GPS
  • Much thicker: 4.3" vs 1.3"

common strengths of the SX40 and SX280 HS

  • Very high speed movies: 240 fps vs 240 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS