Summary Canon S200

Prices Price
Camera only
$400
Score Snapsort rank
Within its price range
#n/a of 5
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 12
Specifications Key specs
Zoom
Help 5x
Screen size
Help 3"
Aperture
Help f/1.8
Screen resolution
Help 461k dots
Wide angle
Help 24 mm
Movie format
Help 720p @ 24fps
see all specifications
Canon PowerShot S200Canon PowerShot S200

gallery

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot S200.

Pros

Report a correction

The Canon S200 vs other recent pro digicams

Built-in flash Built-in flash Help
Usually standard
Supports 24p 24p movies Help
For that film look
Weight Very light Help
181 g
Size Really small Help
Compact (100×59×26 mm)
Thickness Thin Help
1"
Lowest price Inexpensive Help
$399.99

Cons

Report a correction

The Canon S200 vs other recent pro digicams

Sensor size Small sensor Help
1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
Screen resolution Very low resolution screen Help
461k dots
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
6,400 ISO
True resolution Lower true resolution Help
10.1 MP
Autofocus contrast detection autofocus Help
slower focusing
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack Help
Limited to the in-camera mic
Screen type Screen type Help
LCD
Announced Old Help
February 2014
Viewfinder Can only preview photos on the screen Help
None
Longest exposure Short exposures Help
15 seconds
Movie format HD movies Help
720p @ 24fps
Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
1.9 fps
Touch screen No touch screen Help
More buttons
Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
Battery life Shorter battery life Help
200 shots
Focus points Fewer focus points Help
9
Sensor type Sensor type Help
CCD
External flash No external flash Help
Less expandable
Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
1/2000 of a second
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users

Appearance

front photo of the Canon PowerShot S200back photo of the Canon PowerShot S200angle photo of the Canon PowerShot S200

Discussion

Canon PowerShot S200
PowerShot S200
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments