Summary Canon N100

Prices Price
Camera only
$340
Score Snapsort rank
Within its price range
#n/a of 4
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 10
Specifications Key specs
Zoom
Help 5x
Screen size
Help 3"
Aperture
Help f/1.8
Screen resolution
Help 922k dots
Wide angle
Help 24 mm
Movie format
Help 1080p @ 30fps
see all specifications
Canon PowerShot N100

Pros

Report a correction

The Canon N100 vs other recent digicams

Aperture Very wide aperture Help
f/1.8
Touch screen Touch screen Help
Fewer buttons
External mic jack External mic jack Help
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Lowest price Inexpensive Help
$339.95
Size Quite small Help
Mid size (105×68×36 mm)
Screen flips out Flip-out screen Help
Great for movies
Thickness Thin Help
1.4"
Report a correction

The Canon N100 vs other recent pro digicams

Built-in flash Built-in flash Help
Usually standard
Battery life Above average battery life Help
330 shots

Cons

Report a correction

The Canon N100 vs other recent digicams

Supports RAW No RAW support Help
Less editing fidelity
Movie format Full HD Help
1080p @ 30fps
HDR Lacks in-camera HDR Help
You could do HDR manually
Announced Old Help
January 2014
Viewfinder Can only preview photos on the screen Help
None
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users
Zoom Below average zoom Help
5x
Supports 24p No 24p movies Help
Missing that film look
Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramas Help
You could stitch photos in post
External flash No external flash Help
Less expandable
Longest exposure Short exposures Help
15 seconds
Report a correction

The Canon N100 vs other recent pro digicams

Sensor size Small sensor Help
1/1.8" 7.44x5.58mm
True resolution Lower true resolution Help
12 MP
Focus points Fewer focus points Help
9
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
6,400 ISO
Autofocus contrast detection autofocus Help
slower focusing
Screen type Screen type Help
LCD

Appearance

front photo of the Canon PowerShot N100back photo of the Canon PowerShot N100

Discussion

Canon PowerShot N100
PowerShot N100
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments