As well as being compared against other pro digicams, the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II is also often compared to boutiques, mirrorless, entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms and super zooms. The Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot G9 X Mark II and the PowerShot G5 X) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V and the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV)

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to other pro digicam competitors include: it significantly higher maximum light sensitivity (25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), has a touch screen, records movies in 24p, is newer (february 2016 vs october 2015) and is more popular.

However, on average it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (8 fps vs 16 fps), lacks and external mic jack and has slightly fewer focus points (31 vs 315).

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II
10 months newer
$449

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Built-in flashes

Canon PowerShot G5 X

Canon PowerShot G5 X
4 months older
$640 - $729

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G5 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has an external mic jack
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G5 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No 24p support
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the PowerShot G5 X and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Built-in flashes

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V
7 months newer
$948 - $1,050

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Many more focus points: 315 vs 31
  • Shoots significantly faster: 24 fps vs 8 fps

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Built-in flashes
  • Popularity: 210 vs 434

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV
8 months older
$811 - $898

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 IV and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Built-in flashes
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)
7 months newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III
1 year older
$698

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 III and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Built-in flashes
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to boutique competitors include: it has a much wider aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.8), has a touch screen, has a screen which flips out, is newer (february 2016 vs september 2014) and is slightly lighter (319 g vs 469 g).

However, on average it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps), lacks and external mic jack, has a slightly shorter battery life (265 shots vs 320 shots), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs optical) and doesn't support an external flash.

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II
2 years older
$649

Significant advantages of the G1X Mark II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Supports an external flash
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the G1X Mark II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/2 vs f/1.8
  • Higher frame rate movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • No 24p support

common strengths of the G1X Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Fairly small: Standard size (116×74×66 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Have touch screens

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100
1 year older
$555 - $648

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen
  • Screen does not flip out
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the DMC-LX100 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Very wide aperture: f/1.7 vs f/1.8
  • Good movie support: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Fairly small: Mid size (115×66×55 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)

Ricoh GR II

Ricoh GR II
8 months older
$559

Significant advantages of the GR II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Longer battery life: 320 shots vs 265 shots
  • Supports an external flash
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the GR II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Higher frame rate movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the GR II and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Fairly small: Mid size (117×63×35 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • 24p support
  • Very light: 251 g vs 319 g

Fujifilm X100F

Fujifilm X100F
1 year newer
$1,190 - $1,299

Significant advantages of the X100F (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much longer battery life: 390 shots vs 265 shots
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Many more focus points: 325 vs 31

Significant disadvantages of the X100F (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/2 vs f/1.8
  • No touch screen
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the X100F and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Fairly small: Standard size (127×75×52 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • 24p support

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift), has a touch screen, records movies in 24p, is newer (february 2016 vs may 2015) and is more popular.

However, on average it doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital), has a slightly smaller sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs APS-C 22.3x14.9mm), lacks and external mic jack, has a slightly shorter battery life (265 shots vs 350 shots) and users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection).

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000
2 years older
$444 - $548 (body only)
$599 - $648 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the A6000 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Much longer battery life: 420 shots vs 265 shots

Significant disadvantages of the A6000 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen

common strengths of the A6000 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Fairly small: Mid size (120×67×45 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Light weight: 285 g vs 319 g

Fujifilm X-A10

Fujifilm X-A10
9 months newer
$499 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-A10 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Much longer battery life: 410 shots vs 265 shots

Significant disadvantages of the X-A10 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen
  • Lower true resolution: 16 MP vs 20 MP

common strengths of the X-A10 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Fairly small: Mid size (117×67×40 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Light weight: 331 g vs 319 g
  • Thin: 1.6" vs 1.7"

Olympus PEN E-PL8

Olympus PEN E-PL8
7 months newer
$449 (body only)
$549 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the PEN E-PL8 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Significantly longer battery life: 350 shots vs 265 shots
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the PEN E-PL8 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • No 24p support
  • Lower true resolution: 15.9 MP vs 20 MP

common strengths of the PEN E-PL8 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Have touch screens
  • Fairly small: Mid size (115×67×38 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Light weight: 357 g vs 319 g

Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10
4 months older
$449 - $599 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the EOS M10 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the EOS M10 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • None found

common strengths of the EOS M10 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Have touch screens
  • Fairly small: Mid size (108×67×35 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Light weight: 301 g vs 319 g

Canon EOS M3

Canon EOS M3
1 year older
$368 - $679 (body only)
$455 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the M3 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the M3 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • None found

common strengths of the M3 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Have touch screens
  • Fairly small: Mid size (111×68×44 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Light weight: 366 g vs 319 g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7
9 months older
$488 (body only)
$640 - $798 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the DMC-G7 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-G7 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Lower true resolution: 15.8 MP vs 20 MP
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (125×86×77 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 3" vs 1.7"

common strengths of the DMC-G7 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Have touch screens
  • Inexpensive: $488.19 vs $587.00
  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much higher resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 230k dots), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (8 fps vs 3.7 fps).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs APS-C 23.4x15.6mm), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs pentamirror), lacks and external mic jack, has a slightly shorter battery life (265 shots vs 820 shots) and users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection).

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6
similar age
$314 - $649 (body only)
$379 - $449 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the Rebel T6 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the Rebel T6 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Higher frame rate movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 920k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Shoots much slower: 3 fps vs 8 fps

common strengths of the Rebel T6 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Light weight: 485 g vs 319 g

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
2 years older
$425 - $649 (body only)
$500 - $599 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Higher frame rate movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×79 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)

common strengths of the T5i and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • High resolution screens: 1,040k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Have touch screens
  • Flip-out screens

Nikon D5500

Nikon D5500
1 year older
$489 (body only)
$549 - $564 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5500 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the D5500 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size (124×97×70 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Shoots significantly slower: 5 fps vs 8 fps
  • Much thicker: 2.8" vs 1.7"

common strengths of the D5500 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • High resolution screens: 1,037k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Have touch screens
  • Flip-out screens

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i
1 year older
$469 (body only)
$749 - $792 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T6i (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T6i (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Higher frame rate movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Much larger: Professional size (132×101×78 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.7"

common strengths of the T6i and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • High resolution screens: 1,040k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Have touch screens
  • Flip-out screens

Sony SLT A37

Sony SLT A37
3 years older
$522 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the SLT A37 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the SLT A37 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Much smaller screen: 2.6" vs 3"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the SLT A37 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Fast continuous shooting: 7 fps vs 8 fps
  • Flip-out screens

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
5 years older
$499 (body only)
$752 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Higher frame rate movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×80 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)

common strengths of the T3i and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • High resolution screens: 1,040k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Flip-out screens

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/1.8 vs f/3.3), takes significantly higher resolution photos (20 MP vs 9.7 MP), significantly higher maximum light sensitivity (25,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO), has a touch screen and records movies in 24p.

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (4.2x vs 35x), doesn't have a built-in GPS, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (8 fps vs 50 fps), has a slightly shorter battery life (265 shots vs 360 shots) and is slightly more expensive ($587.00 vs $259.99).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)
similar age

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Shoots much faster: 50 fps vs 8 fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • No 24p support
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • High resolution screens: 1,040k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Extremely good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS
similar age
$260 - $349

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX720 HS (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly more zoom: 40x vs 4.2x
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX720 HS (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/1.8
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • No 24p support

common strengths of the PowerShot SX720 HS and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • High resolution screens: 922k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Popularity: 183 vs 434

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V
10 months older
$448

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX90V (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly longer battery life: 360 shots vs 265 shots
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX90V (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/1.8
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 20 MP

common strengths of the DSC-HX90V and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Very good maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

Nikon Coolpix A900

Nikon Coolpix A900
similar age
$259 - $397

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A900 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A900 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/1.8
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • No 24p support

common strengths of the Coolpix A900 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Flip-out screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.8), is significantly smaller (mid size (106×61×42 mm) vs large (140×103×137 mm)), takes slightly higher resolution photos (20 MP vs 9.7 MP), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has way more less zoom (4.2x vs 83.3x), has a slightly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 1,620k dots), lacks and external mic jack and has a slightly shorter battery life (265 shots vs 360 shots).

Canon PowerShot G3 X

Canon PowerShot G3 X
8 months older
$699 - $899

Significant advantages of the G3 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,620k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the G3 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • No 24p support
  • Larger: Prosumer size (123×77×105 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)

common strengths of the G3 X and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (123×77×105 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Extremely good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Have touch screens

Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon Coolpix P900
1 year older
$469 - $697

Significant advantages of the P900 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much more zoom: 83.3x vs 4.2x
  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly longer battery life: 360 shots vs 265 shots

Significant disadvantages of the P900 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much larger: Large (140×103×137 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • No 24p support

common strengths of the P900 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Popularity: 355 vs 434