As well as being compared against other pro digicams, the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II is also often compared to boutiques, mirrorless, entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms and super zooms. The Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot G5 X and the PowerShot G9 X Mark II) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V and the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV)

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to other pro digicam competitors include: it is slightly less noisy at high ISO (581 ISO vs 495 ISO), has slightly wider dynamic range (12.7 EV vs 12.3 EV), significantly higher maximum light sensitivity (25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), has a touch screen and records movies in 24p.

However, on average it doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps), users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection), has slightly fewer focus points (31 vs 315), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital) and doesn't support an external flash.

Canon PowerShot G5 X

Canon PowerShot G5 X
4 months older
$640 - $729

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G5 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has an external mic jack
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G5 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No 24p support
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the PowerShot G5 X and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Built-in flashes

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II
10 months newer
$449

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Built-in flashes

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V
7 months newer
$998 - $1,050

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Many more focus points: 315 vs 31
  • Shoots significantly faster: 24 fps vs 8 fps

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Built-in flashes
  • Popularity: 354 vs 529

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV
8 months older
$836 - $898

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 IV and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Built-in flashes
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Popularity: 309 vs 529

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X
1 year older
$585

Significant advantages of the G7 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the G7 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No 24p support
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the G7 X and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Built-in flashes

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III
1 year older
$748

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 III and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Built-in flashes
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to boutique competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.8), has slightly better image quality (71.0 vs 60.0), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen and has much more color depth (23 bits vs 21.7 bits).

However, on average it users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection), has slightly fewer focus points (31 vs 325), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital), doesn't support an external flash and has a slower max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second).

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II
2 years older
$649

Significant advantages of the G1X Mark II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Supports an external flash
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the G1X Mark II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Less dynamic range: 10.8 EV vs 12.7 EV
  • Worse color depth: 21.7 bits vs 23 bits
  • Significantly worse image quality: 60.0 vs 71.0

common strengths of the G1X Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Fairly small: Standard size (116×74×66 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Have touch screens

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100
1 year older
$569 - $798

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Worse color depth: 22.3 bits vs 23 bits
  • No touch screen
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the DMC-LX100 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Wide aperture: f/1.7 vs f/1.8
  • Fairly small: Mid size (115×66×55 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Fujifilm X100F

Fujifilm X100F
1 year newer
$1,260 - $1,299

Significant advantages of the X100F (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has an external mic jack
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Significantly more focus points: 325 vs 31

Significant disadvantages of the X100F (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the X100F and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Fairly small: Standard size (127×75×52 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • 24p support
  • Light weight: 469 g vs 319 g

Nikon Coolpix A

Nikon Coolpix A
3 years older
$587

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly better image quality: 80.0 vs 71.0
  • More dynamic range: 13.8 EV vs 12.7 EV
  • Better color depth: 23.4 bits vs 23 bits

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Coolpix A and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Fairly small: Mid size (111×64×40 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • 24p support
  • Very light: 299 g vs 319 g

Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X
4 years older
$498

Significant advantages of the G1X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the G1X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Less dynamic range: 10.8 EV vs 12.7 EV
  • Worse color depth: 21.7 bits vs 23 bits
  • Much narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8

common strengths of the G1X and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • 24p support
  • Flip-out screens

Fujifilm X70

Fujifilm X70
similar age
$685 - $699

Significant advantages of the X70 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Supports an external flash
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the X70 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8

common strengths of the X70 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Fairly small: Mid size (113×64×44 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • 24p support

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has better image stabilization (lens vs none), has much wider dynamic range (12.7 EV vs 11.8 EV), is newer (february 2016 vs february 2015), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs LIVEMOS) and is more popular.

However, on average it is much more noisy at high ISO (581 ISO vs 1,169 ISO), has much lower image quality (71.0 vs 80.0), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital), has much less color depth (23 bits vs 23.8 bits) and has a slightly smaller sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs APS-C 22.3x14.9mm).

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000
2 years older
$450 - $498 (body only)
$579 - $598 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the A6000 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 1,347 ISO vs 581 ISO
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the A6000 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen

common strengths of the A6000 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Extremely good image quality: 82.0 vs 71.0
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Excellent color depth: 24.1 bits vs 23 bits

Sony Alpha A5100

Sony Alpha A5100
1 year older
$398 (body only)
$498 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the A5100 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 1,347 ISO vs 581 ISO
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Much longer battery life: 400 shots vs 265 shots

Significant disadvantages of the A5100 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the A5100 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Extremely good image quality: 80.0 vs 71.0
  • Excellent color depth: 23.8 bits vs 23 bits
  • Excellent dynamic range: 13 EV vs 12.7 EV

Canon EOS M3

Canon EOS M3
1 year older
$401 - $429 (body only)
$532 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the M3 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 1,169 ISO vs 581 ISO
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the M3 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • None found

common strengths of the M3 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Extremely good image quality: 72.0 vs 71.0
  • Excellent color depth: 22.8 bits vs 23 bits
  • Excellent dynamic range: 11.8 EV vs 12.7 EV

Olympus PEN E-PL8

Olympus PEN E-PL8
7 months newer
$549 (body only)
$497 - $649 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the PEN E-PL8 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Significantly longer battery life: 350 shots vs 265 shots
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the PEN E-PL8 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • No 24p support
  • Lower true resolution: 15.9 MP vs 20 MP

common strengths of the PEN E-PL8 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Have touch screens
  • Flip-out screens
  • Fairly small: Mid size (115×67×38 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9)

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9)
10 months newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Lower true resolution: 15.8 MP vs 20 MP
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9) and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Have touch screens
  • Flip-out screens
  • Fairly small: Compact (107×65×33 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4
2 years older
$900 - $1,498 (body only)
$1,469 14-140mm lens

Significant advantages of the DMC-GH4 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 812 ISO vs 581 ISO
  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GH4 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: LIVEMOS vs CMOS

common strengths of the DMC-GH4 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Extremely good image quality: 74.0 vs 71.0
  • Excellent color depth: 23.2 bits vs 23 bits
  • Excellent dynamic range: 12.8 EV vs 12.7 EV

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (8 fps vs 3 fps), has a screen which flips out and has slightly more focus points (31 vs 19).

However, on average it is much more noisy at high ISO (581 ISO vs 1,438 ISO), has slightly lower image quality (71.0 vs 84.0), has a slightly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2"), takes slightly lower resolution photos (20 MP vs 24 MP) and has a much smaller sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.6mm).

Nikon D5500

Nikon D5500
1 year older
$500 (body only)
$549 - $599 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5500 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 1,438 ISO vs 581 ISO
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Significantly better image quality: 84.0 vs 71.0

Significant disadvantages of the D5500 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size (124×97×70 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Shoots much slower: 5 fps vs 8 fps
  • Much thicker: 2.8" vs 1.7"

common strengths of the D5500 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Have touch screens
  • Flip-out screens

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6
similar age
$318 - $699 (body only)
$367 - $449 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the Rebel T6 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the Rebel T6 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Higher frame rate movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Shoots much slower: 3 fps vs 8 fps
  • Much larger: Professional size (129×101×78 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)

common strengths of the Rebel T6 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Light weight: 485 g vs 319 g

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i
1 year older
$799 - $852 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T6i (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Significantly lower noise at high ISO: 919 ISO vs 581 ISO
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T6i (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Higher frame rate movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Much larger: Professional size (132×101×78 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.7"

common strengths of the T6i and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Have touch screens
  • Flip-out screens

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/1.8 vs f/3.3), takes significantly higher resolution photos (20 MP vs 9.7 MP), significantly higher maximum light sensitivity (25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO), has a touch screen and records movies in 24p.

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (4.2x vs 30x), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (8 fps vs 40 fps) and has a slightly shorter battery life (265 shots vs 320 shots).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)
similar age

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Shoots much faster: 50 fps vs 8 fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • No 24p support
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • High resolution screens: 1,040k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"

Nikon Coolpix A900

Nikon Coolpix A900
similar age
$299 - $397

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A900 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • More zoom: 35x vs 4.2x
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A900 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/1.8
  • No 24p support
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the Coolpix A900 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Flip-out screens

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)
similar age

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Shoots much faster: 40 fps vs 8 fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/1.8
  • No 24p support
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80) and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • High resolution screens: 1,040k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Have touch screens

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS
similar age
$249

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX620 HS (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX620 HS (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.2 vs f/1.8
  • No 24p support
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the PowerShot SX620 HS and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • High resolution screens: 922k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V
10 months older
$448

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX90V (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly longer battery life: 360 shots vs 265 shots
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX90V (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/1.8
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 20 MP

common strengths of the DSC-HX90V and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.8), has much better image quality (71.0 vs 63.0), is significantly smaller (mid size (106×61×42 mm) vs large (130×94×119 mm)), takes slightly higher resolution photos (20 MP vs 9.7 MP) and slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

However, on average it has much less zoom (4.2x vs 60x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (24 mm vs 20 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 1,620k dots) and lacks and external mic jack.

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)
10 months newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much more zoom: 60x vs 4.2x
  • Significantly better wide angle: 20 mm vs 24 mm
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Significantly larger: Large (130×94×119 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82) and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • High resolution screens: 1,040k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Have touch screens
  • Popularity: 490 vs 529

Canon PowerShot G3 X

Canon PowerShot G3 X
8 months older
$699 - $849

Significant advantages of the G3 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 1,620k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the G3 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • No 24p support
  • Larger: Prosumer size (123×77×105 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)

common strengths of the G3 X and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • High resolution screens: 1,620k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Extremely good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Have touch screens