As well as being compared against other pro digicams, the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II is also often compared to boutiques, pro DSLRs, mirrorless, travel zooms, entry-level DSLRs and super zooms. The Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix DC-LX100 II and the Lumix DMC-LX100) and Canon (such as the PowerShot SX740 HS and the EOS M100)

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to other pro digicam competitors include: it significantly higher maximum light sensitivity (25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), has a touch screen, records movies in 24p, is newer (february 2016 vs june 2015) and is more popular.

However, on average it doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital) and doesn't support an external flash.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III
1 year older
$648 - $782

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 III and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II
10 months newer
$429 - $828

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X
1 year older
$544

Significant advantages of the G7 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the G7 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the G7 X and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Have touch screens

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV
8 months older
$798 - $811

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Shoots faster: 16 fps vs 8 fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 IV and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)
7 months newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Extremely good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

Canon PowerShot G5 X

Canon PowerShot G5 X
4 months older
$699

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G5 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has an external mic jack
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G5 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the PowerShot G5 X and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Have touch screens

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to boutique competitors include: it has way more more zoom (4.2x vs 3.1x), is slightly smaller (mid size (106×61×42 mm) vs standard size (116×74×66 mm)), has a touch screen, has a screen which flips out and is thinner (1.7" vs 2.5").

However, on average it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (25,600 ISO vs 204,800 ISO), has a marginally smaller sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs full frame 35.9x23.9mm), lacks and external mic jack and users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection).

Panasonic Lumix DC-LX100 II

Placeholder
2 years newer
$998

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-LX100 II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Shoots faster: 11 fps vs 8 fps
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-LX100 II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much less zoom: 3.1x vs 4.2x
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Thicker: 2.5" vs 1.7"

common strengths of the Lumix DC-LX100 II and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Wide aperture: f/1.7 vs f/1.8
  • Great zoom: 3.1x vs 4.2x
  • Fairly small: Standard size (115×66×64 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)

Nikon Z 6

Placeholder
2 years newer
$1,997 - $2,594

Significant advantages of the Z 6 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 2,100k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 204,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Much larger sensor: Full frame 35.9x23.9mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm

Significant disadvantages of the Z 6 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (134×101×68 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Significantly heavier: 675 g vs 319 g

common strengths of the Z 6 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Flip-out screens

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100
1 year older
$590 - $598

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Shoots faster: 11 fps vs 8 fps
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much less zoom: 3.1x vs 4.2x
  • No touch screen
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the DMC-LX100 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Wide aperture: f/1.7 vs f/1.8
  • Great zoom: 3.1x vs 4.2x
  • Good movie support: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps

Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark III

Placeholder
1 year newer
$1,099

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G1 X Mark III (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G1 X Mark III (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much less zoom: 3x vs 4.2x
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8

common strengths of the PowerShot G1 X Mark III and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Fairly small: Standard size (115×78×51 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Flip-out screens

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II
2 years older
$799

Significant advantages of the G1X Mark II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much more zoom: 5x vs 4.2x
  • Supports an external flash
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the G1X Mark II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Higher frame rate movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • No 24p support
  • Shoots slower: 5.2 fps vs 8 fps

common strengths of the G1X Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Wide aperture: f/2 vs f/1.8
  • Incredible zoom: 5x vs 4.2x
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Fujifilm X100F

Fujifilm X100F
1 year newer
$1,088 - $1,199

Significant advantages of the X100F (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has an external mic jack
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Significantly longer battery life: 390 shots vs 265 shots

Significant disadvantages of the X100F (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the X100F and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Wide aperture: f/2 vs f/1.8
  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Fairly small: Standard size (127×75×52 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)

compared toPro DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to pro DSLR competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has much wider dynamic range (12.7 EV vs 12.1 EV), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen and has a screen which flips out.

However, on average it is much more noisy at high ISO (581 ISO vs 2,340 ISO), has much lower image quality (71.0 vs 93.0), has much less color depth (23 bits vs 24.8 bits), has a significantly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2") and has a slightly lower resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 1,620k dots).

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
6 months newer
$2,375 - $3,099 (body only)
$3,143 - $3,999 24-105mm lens

Significant advantages of the 5D Mark IV (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 1,620k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"

Significant disadvantages of the 5D Mark IV (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Screen does not flip out
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 1.7"
  • Much larger: Professional size (151×116×76 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)

common strengths of the 5D Mark IV and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Have touch screens
  • Fairly small: Professional size (151×116×76 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Thin: 3" vs 1.7"

Canon EOS-1D X Mark II

Canon EOS-1D X Mark II
similar age
$4,767 - $5,499 (body only)
$6,198 16-35mm lens

Significant advantages of the EOS-1D X Mark II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 975 ISO vs 581 ISO
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 1,620k dots vs 1,040k dots

Significant disadvantages of the EOS-1D X Mark II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much worse image quality: 66.0 vs 71.0
  • Worse color depth: 22.3 bits vs 23 bits
  • Less dynamic range: 11.2 EV vs 12.7 EV

common strengths of the EOS-1D X Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Have touch screens

Nikon D750

Nikon D750
1 year older
$1,329 - $1,697 (body only)
$1,821 - $2,197 24-120mm lens

Significant advantages of the D750 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 2,956 ISO vs 581 ISO
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"

Significant disadvantages of the D750 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • No touch screen
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.7"

common strengths of the D750 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Extremely good image quality: 93.0 vs 71.0
  • Excellent color depth: 24.8 bits vs 23 bits
  • Excellent dynamic range: 14.5 EV vs 12.7 EV

Canon EOS 6D

Canon EOS 6D
3 years older
$999 - $1,269 (body only)
$1,499 - $1,999 24-105mm lens

Significant advantages of the 6D (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 2,340 ISO vs 581 ISO
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the 6D (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Higher frame rate movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 6D and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Extremely good image quality: 82.0 vs 71.0
  • Excellent color depth: 23.8 bits vs 23 bits
  • Excellent dynamic range: 12.1 EV vs 12.7 EV

Nikon D800

Nikon D800
4 years older
$1,799 - $2,433 (body only)
$2,666 24-85mm lens

Significant advantages of the D800 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 2,979 ISO vs 581 ISO
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"

Significant disadvantages of the D800 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Higher frame rate movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the D800 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Extremely good image quality: 96.0 vs 71.0
  • Excellent color depth: 25.6 bits vs 23 bits
  • Excellent dynamic range: 14.4 EV vs 12.7 EV

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift), has a touch screen, is slightly smaller (mid size (106×61×42 mm) vs standard size (121×83×47 mm)), is slightly lighter (319 g vs 410 g) and is more popular.

However, on average it doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital), has a marginally smaller sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs APS-C 22.3x14.9mm), lacks and external mic jack, has a slightly shorter battery life (265 shots vs 410 shots) and users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection).

Canon EOS M100

Placeholder
1 year newer
$991 (body only)
$449 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the EOS M100 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the EOS M100 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • None found

common strengths of the EOS M100 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Fairly small: Mid size (108×67×35 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Light weight: 302 g vs 319 g
  • Thin: 1.4" vs 1.7"

Olympus OM-D E-M10 III

Placeholder
1 year newer
$1,167 14-150mm lens

Significant advantages of the OM-D E-M10 III (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the OM-D E-M10 III (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the OM-D E-M10 III and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Light weight: 410 g vs 319 g
  • Inexpensive: $722.99 vs $520.49
  • Each has a built-in flash

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85
7 months newer
$798 12-60mm lens

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-G85 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-G85 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (128×89×74 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 2.9" vs 1.7"

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-G85 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Each has a built-in flash

Sony Alpha a6500

Sony Alpha a6500
7 months newer
$1,198 (body only)
$1,598 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the Alpha a6500 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Many more focus points: 425 vs 31

Significant disadvantages of the Alpha a6500 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Alpha a6500 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Fairly small: Mid size (120×67×53 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Each has a built-in flash

Fujifilm X-T100

Placeholder
2 years newer
$599 - $600 (body only)
$699 - $700 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-T100 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the X-T100 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • None found

common strengths of the X-T100 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Thin: 1.9" vs 1.7"
  • Inexpensive: $599.00 vs $520.49
  • Each has a built-in flash

Fujifilm X-A10

Fujifilm X-A10
9 months newer
$440 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-A10 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Longer battery life: 410 shots vs 265 shots

Significant disadvantages of the X-A10 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen

common strengths of the X-A10 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Fairly small: Mid size (117×67×40 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Light weight: 331 g vs 319 g
  • Thin: 1.6" vs 1.7"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much wider aperture (f/1.8 vs f/3.3), takes slightly higher resolution photos (20 MP vs 9.7 MP), significantly higher maximum light sensitivity (25,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO), has a touch screen and records movies in 24p.

However, on average it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (8 fps vs 24 fps), has slightly fewer focus points (31 vs 315), is older (february 2016 vs february 2018) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital).

Canon PowerShot SX740 HS

Placeholder
2 years newer
$399

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX740 HS (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Faster max shutter speed: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX740 HS (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/1.8
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Much lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 20 MP

common strengths of the PowerShot SX740 HS and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI

Placeholder
2 years newer
$1,198

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Shoots much faster: 24 fps vs 8 fps
  • Many more focus points: 315 vs 31

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP
  • Have touch screens

Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200)

Placeholder
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly longer battery life: 370 shots vs 265 shots
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/1.8
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200) and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Extremely good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP
  • Have touch screens

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)
similar age

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Shoots much faster: 50 fps vs 8 fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • No 24p support
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Extremely good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP

Nikon Coolpix A900

Nikon Coolpix A900
similar age
$218 - $397

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A900 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A900 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/1.8
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Much lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 20 MP

common strengths of the Coolpix A900 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SX730 HS

Placeholder
1 year newer
$360 - $379

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX730 HS (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Faster max shutter speed: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX730 HS (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/1.8
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Much lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 20 MP

common strengths of the PowerShot SX730 HS and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • None found

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs none), has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.5"), has a much higher resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 230k dots), has image stabilization (lens vs none) and takes slightly higher resolution photos (20 MP vs 10 MP).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.8mm), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs pentaprism), has a much shorter battery life (265 shots vs 1200 shots), users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection) and has a built-in lens.

Nikon D3400

Nikon D3400
6 months newer
$326 (body only)
$409 - $447 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3400 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much longer battery life: 1200 shots vs 265 shots
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the D3400 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 921k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Much larger: Prosumer size (124×98×76 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Shoots significantly slower: 5 fps vs 8 fps

common strengths of the D3400 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Light weight: 395 g vs 319 g

Nikon D80

Nikon D80
9 years older
$1,499 18-55mm, 55-200mm lenses

Significant advantages of the D80 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the D80 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Does not take movies: None vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the D80 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.8), is significantly smaller (mid size (106×61×42 mm) vs large (133×94×145 mm)), records movies in 24p, is thinner (1.7" vs 5.7") and is significantly lighter (319 g vs 1,095 g).

However, on average it has a significantly lower resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 1,620k dots), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (8 fps vs 24 fps), lacks and external mic jack, has a significantly shorter battery life (265 shots vs 400 shots) and users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection).

Canon PowerShot G3 X

Canon PowerShot G3 X
8 months older
$564 - $849

Significant advantages of the G3 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 1,620k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the G3 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Larger: Prosumer size (123×77×105 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 4.1" vs 1.7"

common strengths of the G3 X and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (123×77×105 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Very good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV

Placeholder
1 year newer
$1,698

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Higher resolution screen: 1,440k dots vs 1,040k dots

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much larger: Large (133×94×145 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Much thicker: 5.7" vs 1.7"
  • Much heavier: 1,095 g vs 319 g

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Very good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP
  • Have touch screens