As well as being compared against other pro digicams, the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II is also often compared to boutiques, mirrorless, pro DSLRs, entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms and super zooms. The Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot G9 X Mark II and the PowerShot G5 X) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V and the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV)

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to other pro digicam competitors include: it is slightly less noisy at high ISO (581 ISO vs 556 ISO), significantly higher maximum light sensitivity (25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), has a touch screen, records movies in 24p and is more popular.

However, on average it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps), has slightly fewer focus points (31 vs 315) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital).

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II
10 months newer
$449

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Each has a built-in flash

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)
7 months newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V
7 months newer
$998 - $1,050

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Many more focus points: 315 vs 31
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Each has a built-in flash

Canon PowerShot G5 X

Canon PowerShot G5 X
4 months older
$650 - $729

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G5 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has an external mic jack
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G5 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No 24p support
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the PowerShot G5 X and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Each has a built-in flash

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV
8 months older
$832 - $898

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 IV and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X
1 year older
$569

Significant advantages of the G7 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the G7 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No 24p support
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the G7 X and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to boutique competitors include: it has slightly better image quality (71.0 vs 60.0), is slightly smaller (mid size (106×61×42 mm) vs standard size (116×74×66 mm)), has a touch screen, has much more color depth (23 bits vs 21.7 bits) and has much wider dynamic range (12.7 EV vs 10.8 EV).

However, on average it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps), has a slightly shorter battery life (265 shots vs 330 shots), users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital) and doesn't support an external flash.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100
1 year older
$537 - $798

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Worse color depth: 22.3 bits vs 23 bits
  • No touch screen
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the DMC-LX100 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Wide aperture: f/1.7 vs f/1.8
  • Fairly small: Mid size (115×66×55 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II
2 years older
$649

Significant advantages of the G1X Mark II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Supports an external flash
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the G1X Mark II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Less dynamic range: 10.8 EV vs 12.7 EV
  • Worse color depth: 21.7 bits vs 23 bits
  • Significantly worse image quality: 60.0 vs 71.0

common strengths of the G1X Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Fairly small: Standard size (116×74×66 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Have touch screens

Fujifilm X70

Fujifilm X70
similar age
$685 - $699

Significant advantages of the X70 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Supports an external flash
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the X70 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8

common strengths of the X70 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Fairly small: Mid size (113×64×44 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • 24p support

Fujifilm X100F

Fujifilm X100F
1 year newer
$1,299

Significant advantages of the X100F (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has an external mic jack
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Significantly more focus points: 325 vs 31

Significant disadvantages of the X100F (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the X100F and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Fairly small: Standard size (127×75×52 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • 24p support
  • Light weight: 469 g vs 319 g

Leica D-Lux (Typ 109)

Leica D-Lux (Typ 109)
1 year older
$1,095

Significant advantages of the D-Lux (Typ 109) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the D-Lux (Typ 109) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen
  • Screen does not flip out
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the D-Lux (Typ 109) and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Wide aperture: f/1.7 vs f/1.8
  • Fairly small: Mid size (118×66×55 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Leica X (Typ 113)

Leica X (Typ 113)
1 year older
$3,968

Significant advantages of the X (Typ 113) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Longer battery life: 350 shots vs 265 shots

Significant disadvantages of the X (Typ 113) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (133×73×78 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • No touch screen
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the X (Typ 113) and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Wide aperture: f/1.7 vs f/1.8
  • Light weight: 486 g vs 319 g
  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has much more color depth (23 bits vs 22.8 bits), has much wider dynamic range (12.7 EV vs 11.8 EV), has a touch screen, is newer (february 2016 vs october 2015) and is more popular.

However, on average it is much more noisy at high ISO (581 ISO vs 1,169 ISO), has much lower image quality (71.0 vs 82.0), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps) and has a slightly smaller sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs APS-C 22.3x14.9mm).

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000
2 years older
$470 - $548 (body only)
$547 - $648 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the A6000 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 1,347 ISO vs 581 ISO
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Much longer battery life: 420 shots vs 265 shots

Significant disadvantages of the A6000 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen

common strengths of the A6000 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Extremely good image quality: 82.0 vs 71.0
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Excellent color depth: 24.1 bits vs 23 bits

Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300
similar age
$868 - $948 (body only)
$978 - $1,048 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the Alpha a6300 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Many more focus points: 425 vs 31

Significant disadvantages of the Alpha a6300 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Alpha a6300 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • 24p support
  • Flip-out screens
  • Popularity: 1,003 vs 1,011

Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10
4 months older
$449 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the EOS M10 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 753 ISO vs 581 ISO
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the EOS M10 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much worse image quality: 65.0 vs 71.0
  • Worse color depth: 22.2 bits vs 23 bits
  • Less dynamic range: 11.4 EV vs 12.7 EV

common strengths of the EOS M10 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Have touch screens
  • 24p support
  • Flip-out screens

Canon EOS M3

Canon EOS M3
1 year older
$413 - $429 (body only)
$599 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the M3 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 1,169 ISO vs 581 ISO
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the M3 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • None found

common strengths of the M3 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Extremely good image quality: 72.0 vs 71.0
  • Excellent color depth: 22.8 bits vs 23 bits
  • Excellent dynamic range: 11.8 EV vs 12.7 EV

Fujifilm X-A10

Fujifilm X-A10
9 months newer
$499 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-A10 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Much longer battery life: 410 shots vs 265 shots

Significant disadvantages of the X-A10 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No touch screen

common strengths of the X-A10 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Flip-out screens
  • Fairly small: Mid size (117×67×40 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Light weight: 331 g vs 319 g

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9)

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9)
10 months newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Lower true resolution: 15.8 MP vs 20 MP
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9) and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Have touch screens
  • Flip-out screens
  • Fairly small: Compact (107×65×33 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)

compared toPro DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to pro DSLR competitors include: it has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, has a screen which flips out, is newer (february 2016 vs september 2014) and is much smaller (mid size (106×61×42 mm) vs professional size (151×116×76 mm)).

However, on average it is much more noisy at high ISO (581 ISO vs 2,956 ISO), has much lower image quality (71.0 vs 93.0), has significantly less color depth (23 bits vs 24.8 bits), has slightly narrower dynamic range (12.7 EV vs 14.5 EV) and has a significantly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2").

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
6 months newer
$3,299 (body only)
$4,049 24-70mm lens

Significant advantages of the 5D Mark IV (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"

Significant disadvantages of the 5D Mark IV (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Screen does not flip out
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 1.7"
  • Much larger: Professional size (151×116×76 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)

common strengths of the 5D Mark IV and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Have touch screens
  • Fairly small: Professional size (151×116×76 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Thin: 3" vs 1.7"

Nikon D750

Nikon D750
1 year older
$1,486 - $1,797 (body only)
$2,126 - $2,297 24-120mm lens

Significant advantages of the D750 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 2,956 ISO vs 581 ISO
  • Much better image quality: 93.0 vs 71.0

Significant disadvantages of the D750 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • No touch screen
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.7"

common strengths of the D750 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Good dynamic range: 14.5 EV vs 12.7 EV
  • Flip-out screens
  • Fairly small: Professional size (141×113×78 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (8 fps vs 5 fps) and has a screen which flips out.

However, on average it is much more noisy at high ISO (581 ISO vs 1,333 ISO), has slightly lower image quality (71.0 vs 87.0), has slightly less color depth (23 bits vs 24.5 bits), has a slightly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2") and takes slightly lower resolution photos (20 MP vs 24 MP).

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6
similar age
$328 - $699 (body only)
$359 - $449 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the Rebel T6 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the Rebel T6 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Higher frame rate movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Shoots much slower: 3 fps vs 8 fps
  • Much larger: Professional size (129×101×78 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)

common strengths of the Rebel T6 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Light weight: 485 g vs 319 g

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i
1 year older
$799 - $851 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T6i (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Significantly lower noise at high ISO: 919 ISO vs 581 ISO
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T6i (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Higher frame rate movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Much larger: Professional size (132×101×78 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Shoots much slower: 5 fps vs 8 fps

common strengths of the T6i and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Have touch screens
  • Flip-out screens

Canon EOS 80D

Canon EOS 80D
similar age
$909 - $1,099 (body only)
$1,249 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the EOS 80D (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the EOS 80D (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much larger: Professional size (139×105×79 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.7"
  • Much heavier: 730 g vs 319 g

common strengths of the EOS 80D and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Fast continuous shooting: 7 fps vs 8 fps
  • Have touch screens

Nikon D7200

Nikon D7200
1 year older
$803 - $997 (body only)
$1,077 - $1,297 18-140mm lens

Significant advantages of the D7200 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 1,333 ISO vs 581 ISO
  • Much better image quality: 87.0 vs 71.0

Significant disadvantages of the D7200 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much larger: Professional size (136×107×76 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 1.7"

common strengths of the D7200 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 60fps

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/1.8 vs f/3.3), takes significantly higher resolution photos (20 MP vs 9.7 MP), significantly higher maximum light sensitivity (25,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO), has a touch screen and records movies in 24p.

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (4.2x vs 35x), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (8 fps vs 50 fps), is slightly more expensive ($669.99 vs $259.95), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/3200 of a second).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)
similar age

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Shoots much faster: 50 fps vs 8 fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • No 24p support
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • High resolution screens: 1,040k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS
similar age
$260 - $349

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX720 HS (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly more zoom: 40x vs 4.2x
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX720 HS (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/1.8
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • No 24p support

common strengths of the PowerShot SX720 HS and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • High resolution screens: 922k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Nikon Coolpix A900

Nikon Coolpix A900
similar age
$299 - $397

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A900 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • More zoom: 35x vs 4.2x
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A900 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/1.8
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • No 24p support

common strengths of the Coolpix A900 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Flip-out screens

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/1.8 vs f/3.3), has slightly better image quality (71.0 vs 63.0), is significantly smaller (mid size (106×61×42 mm) vs professional size (125×85×107 mm)), takes slightly higher resolution photos (20 MP vs 9.7 MP) and slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (25,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (4.2x vs 60x), records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps), has a slightly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 1,620k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps).

Nikon Coolpix B700

Nikon Coolpix B700
similar age
$369 - $447

Significant advantages of the Coolpix B700 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much more zoom: 60x vs 4.2x
  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix B700 (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/1.8
  • Significantly larger: Professional size (125×85×107 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the Coolpix B700 and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Light weight: 565 g vs 319 g
  • Popularity: 846 vs 1,011

Canon PowerShot G3 X

Canon PowerShot G3 X
8 months older
$699 - $849

Significant advantages of the G3 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,620k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the G3 X (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (123×77×105 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • No 24p support

common strengths of the G3 X and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (123×77×105 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • Extremely good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Have touch screens

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II
8 months older
$1,198 - $1,496

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX10 II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX10 II (vs the PowerShot G7 X Mark II)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Significantly larger: Professional size (129×88×102 mm) vs Mid size (106×61×42 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-RX10 II and PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Extremely good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP