As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS is also often compared to waterproofs, ultra compacts, super zooms, pro digicams and compacts. The Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SX620 HS and the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S3600 and the Coolpix A300)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is newer (january 2016 vs january 2015).

However, on average it has way more less zoom (12x vs 18x), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and has a significantly shorter battery life (180 shots vs 270 shots).

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS
4 months newer
$202 - $209

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX620 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much more zoom: 25x vs 12x
  • Much longer battery life: 295 shots vs 180 shots
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 922k dots vs 461k dots

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX620 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Thicker: 1.1" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the PowerShot SX620 HS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Very small: Compact (97×57×28 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 182 g vs 147 g

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS
similar age
$149

Significant advantages of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much less zoom: 10x vs 12x
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Very small: Compact (95×57×24 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 138 g vs 147 g

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS
2 years older
$299

Significant advantages of the 340 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 340 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the 340 HS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Very small: Compact (100×58×22 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 147 g vs 147 g

Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Canon PowerShot ELPH 180
similar age
$90 - $109

Significant advantages of the PowerShot ELPH 180 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot ELPH 180 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much less zoom: 8x vs 12x
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the PowerShot ELPH 180 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Very small: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 126 g vs 147 g

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS
1 year older
$162

Significant advantages of the SX610 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much more zoom: 18x vs 12x
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 922k dots vs 461k dots
  • Much longer battery life: 270 shots vs 180 shots

Significant disadvantages of the SX610 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the SX610 HS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Very small: Compact (105×61×27 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 191 g vs 147 g

Nikon Coolpix S3600

Nikon Coolpix S3600
2 years older
$104

Significant advantages of the S3600 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Longer battery life: 230 shots vs 180 shots

Significant disadvantages of the S3600 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much less zoom: 8x vs 12x
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the S3600 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Very small: Super compact (97×58×20 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 125 g vs 147 g

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a built-in flash, has better image stabilization (lens vs none), is newer (january 2016 vs january 2013) and is slightly less expensive ($198.00 vs $435.54).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.6 vs f/2), records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 4K @ 12fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (25 mm vs 5 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

GoPro Hero 3+ Silver Edition

GoPro Hero 3+ Silver Edition
2 years older
$436

Significant advantages of the Silver Edition (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Silver Edition (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the Silver Edition and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • None found

GoPro HERO3 Black Edition

GoPro HERO3 Black Edition
3 years older

Significant advantages of the Black Edition (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Black Edition (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the Black Edition and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • None found

Ricoh WG-4

Ricoh WG-4
2 years older

Significant advantages of the WG-4 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WG-4 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the WG-4 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • None found

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has way more more zoom (12x vs 4x), records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 28 mm), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is newer (january 2016 vs february 2010).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.6 vs f/2.6), is slightly larger (compact (100×58×23 mm) vs ultra compact (92×52×13 mm)), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), doesn't have a touch screen and has a significantly shorter battery life (180 shots vs 240 shots).

Canon PowerShot SD940 IS

Canon PowerShot SD940 IS
6 years older
$283

Significant advantages of the SD940 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD940 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD940 IS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS
5 years older
$150

Significant advantages of the SD1400 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD1400 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD1400 IS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70
3 years older
$242

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-WX70 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS compared to super zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (compact (100×58×23 mm) vs professional size (120×83×102 mm)), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), is newer (january 2016 vs february 2014) and is thinner (0.9" vs 4").

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.6 vs f/3.1), has significantly less zoom (12x vs 41.7x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (25 mm vs 4 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps) and has a much shorter battery life (180 shots vs 600 shots).

Nikon Coolpix P510

Nikon Coolpix P510
3 years older
$459

Significant advantages of the P510 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Significantly more zoom: 41.7x vs 12x
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 461k dots

Significant disadvantages of the P510 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Significantly larger: Professional size (120×83×102 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Much thicker: 4" vs 0.9"
  • Significantly heavier: 555 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the P510 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Fairly small: Professional size (120×83×102 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Light weight: 555 g vs 147 g

Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500
similar age
$199 - $257

Significant advantages of the Coolpix B500 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much longer battery life: 600 shots vs 180 shots
  • Significantly more zoom: 39.1x vs 12x
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 461k dots

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix B500 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (114×78×95 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.7" vs 0.9"
  • Significantly heavier: 541 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the Coolpix B500 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (114×78×95 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 3.7" vs 0.9"

Nikon Coolpix L340

Nikon Coolpix L340
10 months older
$180

Significant advantages of the L340 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much better wide angle: 4 mm vs 25 mm
  • Much longer battery life: 960 shots vs 180 shots

Significant disadvantages of the L340 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Larger: Prosumer size (111×76×83 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)

common strengths of the L340 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×83 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 430 g vs 147 g

Canon PowerShot SX530 HS

Canon PowerShot SX530 HS
1 year older
$240 - $249

Significant advantages of the SX530 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much more zoom: 50x vs 12x
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the SX530 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (120×82×92 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.6" vs 0.9"
  • Significantly heavier: 442 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the SX530 HS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (120×82×92 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 3.6" vs 0.9"

Canon PowerShot SX420 IS

Canon PowerShot SX420 IS
similar age
$212 - $229

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX420 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Significantly more zoom: 42x vs 12x
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX420 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Significantly thicker: 3.3" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the PowerShot SX420 IS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Fairly small: Standard size (104×69×85 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Very light: 325 g vs 147 g
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 0.9"

Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Sony CyberShot DSC-H300
1 year older
$144 - $178

Significant advantages of the DSC-H300 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • More zoom: 35x vs 12x
  • Much longer battery life: 350 shots vs 180 shots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H300 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Much larger: Large (130×95×122 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Much thicker: 4.8" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the DSC-H300 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Inexpensive: $143.93 vs $198.00

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 35 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 1.8"), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is newer (january 2016 vs june 2003).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/3.6 vs f/2), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't have a touch screen, doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110
3 years older
$699

Significant advantages of the S110 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.6
  • Has a touch screen
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the S110 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the S110 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SD4000 IS

Canon PowerShot SD4000 IS
5 years older

Significant advantages of the SD4000 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.6

Significant disadvantages of the SD4000 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm

common strengths of the SD4000 IS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • None found

Canon PowerShot G5

Placeholder
12 years older
$899

Significant advantages of the G5 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.6
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the G5 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 25 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3"

common strengths of the G5 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS compared to compact competitors include: it has way more more zoom (12x vs 4x), records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 35 mm), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is newer (january 2016 vs august 2009).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.6 vs f/2.8), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't have a touch screen, doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
3 years older
$221

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Supports 24p
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much less zoom: 5x vs 12x

common strengths of the 320 HS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Great zoom: 5x vs 12x
  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 25 mm

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
4 years older
$499

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much less zoom: 5x vs 12x

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Great zoom: 5x vs 12x
  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 25 mm

Samsung TL225

Samsung TL225
6 years older

Significant advantages of the TL225 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 1,152k dots vs 461k dots
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the TL225 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much less zoom: 4.6x vs 12x
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the TL225 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.5" vs 3"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (100×60×19 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)

Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1200 IS
6 years older
$130

Significant advantages of the SD1200 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SD1200 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much less zoom: 3x vs 12x
  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 25 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the SD1200 IS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (86×55×22 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon PowerShot SD950 IS

Canon PowerShot SD950 IS
8 years older
$664

Significant advantages of the SD950 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Significantly longer battery life: 240 shots vs 180 shots
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SD950 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much less zoom: 3.7x vs 12x
  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 25 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 1,024 x 768 @ 15fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the SD950 IS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"

Canon PowerShot SD880 IS

Canon PowerShot SD880 IS
7 years older
$595

Significant advantages of the SD880 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD880 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much less zoom: 4x vs 12x
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the SD880 IS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Compact (94×57×24 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"