As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS is also often compared to ultra compacts, super zooms, waterproofs, pro digicams and compacts. The Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SX620 HS and the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix A300 and the Coolpix S33)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is newer (january 2016 vs february 2015).

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in GPS, has a slightly lower resolution screen (461k dots vs 922k dots), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and has a slightly shorter battery life (180 shots vs 240 shots).

Nikon Coolpix A300

Nikon Coolpix A300
3 months newer
$109 - $137

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A300 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A300 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 461k dots

common strengths of the Coolpix A300 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS
4 months newer
$217 - $279

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX620 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 922k dots vs 461k dots
  • Significantly longer battery life: 295 shots vs 180 shots

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX620 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the PowerShot SX620 HS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Very large screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS
similar age
$120 - $159

Significant advantages of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 461k dots

common strengths of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • None found

Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS
1 year older
$100

Significant advantages of the ELPH 350 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 350 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the ELPH 350 HS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Very large screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS
2 years older
$199

Significant advantages of the 340 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 340 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the 340 HS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Very large screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot SX710 HS

Canon PowerShot SX710 HS
1 year older
$220

Significant advantages of the SX710 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 922k dots vs 461k dots
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the SX710 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the SX710 HS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Very large screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps), has a much wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 35 mm), has a much larger screen (3" vs 2"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (461k dots vs 118k dots) and has better image stabilization (lens vs none).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.6 vs f/2.8), is slightly larger (compact (100×58×23 mm) vs ultra compact (50×22×54 mm)) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Sony CyberShot DSC-W800

Sony CyberShot DSC-W800
1 year older
$120

Significant advantages of the DSC-W800 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W800 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-W800 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS
5 years older
$299

Significant advantages of the SD1400 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD1400 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD1400 IS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SD400

Placeholder
11 years older
$399

Significant advantages of the SD400 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD400 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD400 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (461k dots vs 230k dots), is significantly smaller (compact (100×58×23 mm) vs large (130×95×122 mm)), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), is newer (january 2016 vs january 2015) and is thinner (0.9" vs 4.8").

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (12x vs 50x), has a slightly shorter battery life (180 shots vs 350 shots), users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection) and is less popular.

Canon PowerShot SX420 IS

Canon PowerShot SX420 IS
similar age
$205 - $299

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX420 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Significantly more zoom: 42x vs 12x
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX420 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 461k dots
  • Significantly thicker: 3.3" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the PowerShot SX420 IS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Fairly small: Standard size (104×69×85 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Very light: 325 g vs 147 g
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 0.9"

Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Sony CyberShot DSC-H300
1 year older
$178 - $212

Significant advantages of the DSC-H300 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much longer battery life: 350 shots vs 180 shots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H300 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Significantly larger: Large (130×95×122 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Much thicker: 4.8" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the DSC-H300 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Light weight: 590 g vs 147 g
  • Inexpensive: $178.00 vs $198.00

Canon PowerShot SX530 HS

Canon PowerShot SX530 HS
1 year older
$220 - $279

Significant advantages of the SX530 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Significantly more zoom: 50x vs 12x
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the SX530 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Larger: Prosumer size (120×82×92 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 3.6" vs 0.9"
  • Heavier: 442 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the SX530 HS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (120×82×92 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Light weight: 442 g vs 147 g
  • Thin: 3.6" vs 0.9"

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a built-in flash, has a much larger screen (3" vs 1.5"), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), is newer (january 2016 vs october 2012) and slightly longer exposures (15 seconds vs 1/3245 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.6 vs f/2.8), has a much narrower wide angle lens (25 mm vs 8 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (2.5 fps vs 30 fps) and lacks and external mic jack.

Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33
10 months older
$101

Significant advantages of the S33 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S33 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the S33 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • None found

Fujifilm XP90

Fujifilm XP90
similar age
$278

Significant advantages of the XP90 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP90 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the XP90 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • None found

GoPro HERO3 Black Edition

GoPro HERO3 Black Edition
3 years older

Significant advantages of the Black Edition (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Black Edition (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the Black Edition and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • None found

GoPro HD Hero 2

GoPro HD Hero 2
4 years older

Significant advantages of the HD Hero 2 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the HD Hero 2 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the HD Hero 2 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • None found

Ricoh WG-M1

Ricoh WG-M1
1 year older
$215

Significant advantages of the WG-M1 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WG-M1 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the WG-M1 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • None found

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 28 mm), is slightly smaller (compact (100×58×23 mm) vs compact (98×58×31 mm)), is newer (january 2016 vs june 2012), is thinner (0.9" vs 1.2") and is slightly lighter (147 g vs 209 g).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs 1" 13.2x8.8mm), has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.6 vs f/1.8), has a slightly lower resolution screen (461k dots vs 1,040k dots), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 20 MP).

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
4 years older
$440

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.6
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the S100 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very small: Compact (99×60×28 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
3 years older
$448

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.6
  • Significantly larger sensor: 1" 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 461k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm
  • Significantly larger: Compact (102×58×36 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.4" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Built-in flashes
  • Fairly small: Compact (102×58×36 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Very light: 213 g vs 147 g

Canon ELPH 500 HS

Canon ELPH 500 HS
4 years older
$230

Significant advantages of the 500 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.6
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 500 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the 500 HS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very small: Compact (101×55×25 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 1" vs 0.9"

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Canon PowerShot G9 X
similar age
$379

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G9 X (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Significantly larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.6
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 461k dots

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G9 X (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm
  • Thicker: 1.2" vs 0.9"
  • Heavier: 209 g vs 147 g

common strengths of the PowerShot G9 X and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very small: Compact (98×58×31 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.2" vs 0.9"

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS compared to compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps), has a much wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 35 mm), has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (lens vs none) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.6 vs f/2.8), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
4 years older
$290

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Supports 24p
  • Wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.6

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"

common strengths of the 300 HS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Fairly small: Super compact (92×56×20 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.9"

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
4 years older
$165

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Supports 24p
  • Wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.6

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Fairly small: Super compact (93×57×20 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.9"

Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS

Canon PowerShot SD1300 IS
5 years older
$119

Significant advantages of the SD1300 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD1300 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm

common strengths of the SD1300 IS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Fairly small: Super compact (91×56×22 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 140 g vs 147 g

Canon PowerShot SD700 IS

Canon PowerShot SD700 IS
10 years older
$625

Significant advantages of the SD700 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SD700 IS (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 25 mm
  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3"
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the SD700 IS and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Fairly small: Compact (90×57×26 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.9"

Fujifilm FinePix XP120

Fujifilm FinePix XP120
1 year newer
$139

Significant advantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 461k dots

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Significantly larger: Compact (110×71×28 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)

common strengths of the FinePix XP120 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Inexpensive: $139.00 vs $198.00

Olympus FE-360

Olympus FE-360
7 years older
$135

Significant advantages of the FE-360 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the FE-360 (vs the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 25 mm
  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3"

common strengths of the FE-360 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×56×21 mm) vs Compact (100×58×23 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 138 g vs 147 g