Canon has replaced the ELPH 500 HS with the ELPH 520 HS and 510 HS.
![]() | Canon ELPH 520 HS announced January 2012
| ||||||
![]() | Canon ELPH 510 HS announced August 2011
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Also known as: Canon IXUS 310 HS |
Canon has replaced the ELPH 500 HS with the ELPH 520 HS and 510 HS.
![]() | Canon ELPH 520 HS announced January 2012
| ||||||
![]() | Canon ELPH 510 HS announced August 2011
|
"The 500 HS was able to go up to ISO 800 without... visibly blurry or grainy."pcmag.com | talking about the camera's iso-noise
"The 500 HS shoots incredibly sharp, detailed photos."pcmag.com | talking about the camera's image-quality
"I was very impressed with the quality of the video shot by the 500 HS."pcmag.com | talking about the camera's video-quality
|
|
|
|
Showing 8 comments
Have you used Snapsort to compare the Olympus XZ-1 to the Canon ELPH 500 HS?
The Olympus XZ-1 is going to get better image quality (due to its larger sensor) and have more advanced features, but the Canon ELPH 500 HS has got a wider angle lens, larger LCD, high speed videos etc.
and is this better than the Olympus XZ-1?
The 500HS has a lot of great features, 1080p, 24mm wide angle, high speed video. But, the S95 has the larger sensor (so ultimately better image quality), and I I think more advanced features and manual controls.