Summary Canon 115 HS

Prices Price
Camera kit
$250
Score Snapsort rank
Within its price range
#n/a of 0
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 8
Specifications Key specs
Zoom
Help 8x
Screen size
Help 2.7"
Aperture
Help f/3.2
Screen resolution
Help 230k dots
Wide angle
Help 28 mm
Movie format
Help 720p @ 25fps
see all specifications
Canon ELPH 115 HSCanon ELPH 115 HS

gallery

Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the Canon ELPH 115 HS.

Pros

Report a correction

The Canon 115 HS vs other recent compacts

Built-in flash Built-in flash Help
Usually standard
Image stabilization Image stabilization Help
  1. Lens
Report a correction

The Canon 115 HS vs other recent travel zooms

Size Really small Help
Super compact (93×52×22 mm)
Weight Very light Help
133 g
Thickness Thin Help
0.9"
Lowest price Very inexpensive Help
$249.99

Cons

Report a correction

The Canon 115 HS vs other recent compacts

Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
0.8 fps
Sensor type Sensor type Help
CCD
Autofocus contrast detection autofocus Help
slower focusing
Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
1/2000 of a second
Report a correction

The Canon 115 HS vs other recent travel zooms

Wide angle Very poor wide angle lens Help
28 mm
Screen resolution Very low resolution screen Help
230k dots
Light sensitivity Very poor maximum light sensitivity Help
1,600 ISO
True resolution Lower true resolution Help
9.7 MP
Battery life Very short battery life Help
200 shots
Announced Old Help
January 2013
Longest exposure Short exposures Help
15 seconds
Zoom Poor zoom Help
8x
Screen size Below average sized screen Help
2.7"
Touch screen No touch screen Help
More buttons
Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
Sensor size Small sensor Help
1/2.3" 6.16x4.55mm
Viewfinder Can only preview photos on the screen Help
None
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users

Appearance

front photo of the Canon ELPH 115 HSback photo of the Canon ELPH 115 HSangle photo of the Canon ELPH 115 HS

Discussion

Canon ELPH 115 HS
ELPH 115 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments